Estimating marginal treatment effect in cluster randomized trials with multi-level missing outcomes.

IF 1.4 4区 数学 Q3 BIOLOGY Biometrics Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1093/biomtc/ujae135
Chia-Rui Chang, Rui Wang
{"title":"Estimating marginal treatment effect in cluster randomized trials with multi-level missing outcomes.","authors":"Chia-Rui Chang, Rui Wang","doi":"10.1093/biomtc/ujae135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Analyses of cluster randomized trials (CRTs) can be complicated by informative missing outcome data. Methods such as inverse probability weighted generalized estimating equations have been proposed to account for informative missingness by weighing the observed individual outcome data in each cluster. These existing methods have focused on settings where missingness occurs at the individual level and each cluster has partially or fully observed individual outcomes. In the presence of missing clusters, for example, all outcomes from a cluster are missing due to drop-out of the cluster, these approaches ignore this cluster-level missingness and can lead to biased inference if the cluster-level missingness is informative. Informative missingness at multiple levels can also occur in CRTs with a multi-level structure where study participants are nested in subclusters such as healthcare providers, and the subclusters are nested in clusters such as clinics. In this paper, we propose new estimators for estimating the marginal treatment effect in CRTs accounting for missing outcome data at multiple levels based on weighted generalized estimating equations. We show that the proposed multi-level multiply robust estimator is consistent and asymptotically normally distributed provided that one of the multiple propensity score models postulated at each clustering level is correctly specified. We evaluate the performance of the proposed method through extensive simulations and illustrate its use with a CRT evaluating a Malaria risk-reduction intervention in rural Madagascar.</p>","PeriodicalId":8930,"journal":{"name":"Biometrics","volume":"80 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biometrics","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/biomtc/ujae135","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analyses of cluster randomized trials (CRTs) can be complicated by informative missing outcome data. Methods such as inverse probability weighted generalized estimating equations have been proposed to account for informative missingness by weighing the observed individual outcome data in each cluster. These existing methods have focused on settings where missingness occurs at the individual level and each cluster has partially or fully observed individual outcomes. In the presence of missing clusters, for example, all outcomes from a cluster are missing due to drop-out of the cluster, these approaches ignore this cluster-level missingness and can lead to biased inference if the cluster-level missingness is informative. Informative missingness at multiple levels can also occur in CRTs with a multi-level structure where study participants are nested in subclusters such as healthcare providers, and the subclusters are nested in clusters such as clinics. In this paper, we propose new estimators for estimating the marginal treatment effect in CRTs accounting for missing outcome data at multiple levels based on weighted generalized estimating equations. We show that the proposed multi-level multiply robust estimator is consistent and asymptotically normally distributed provided that one of the multiple propensity score models postulated at each clustering level is correctly specified. We evaluate the performance of the proposed method through extensive simulations and illustrate its use with a CRT evaluating a Malaria risk-reduction intervention in rural Madagascar.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分组随机试验(CRTs)的分析可能会因结果数据的信息缺失而变得复杂。有人提出了反概率加权广义估计方程等方法,通过权衡每个群组中观察到的个体结果数据来解释信息缺失。这些现有方法主要针对的是在个体水平上出现缺失,且每个群组都有部分或全部观察到的个体结果的情况。在群组缺失的情况下,例如,由于退出群组而导致群组中的所有结果缺失,这些方法会忽略群组层面的缺失,如果群组层面的缺失具有信息性,则可能导致推断偏差。在多层次结构的 CRT 中,研究参与者嵌套在医疗保健提供者等子群组中,而子群组嵌套在诊所等群组中,也会出现多层次的信息缺失。在本文中,我们基于加权广义估计方程,提出了在 CRT 中估计边际治疗效果的新估计方法,以考虑多层次结果数据的缺失。我们的研究表明,只要在每个聚类水平上假设的多个倾向评分模型中,有一个是正确指定的,那么所提出的多水平多重稳健估计器就是一致和渐近正态分布的。我们通过大量模拟来评估所提出方法的性能,并用一个评估马达加斯加农村地区疟疾风险降低干预措施的 CRT 来说明该方法的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biometrics
Biometrics 生物-生物学
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
178
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Biometric Society is an international society promoting the development and application of statistical and mathematical theory and methods in the biosciences, including agriculture, biomedical science and public health, ecology, environmental sciences, forestry, and allied disciplines. The Society welcomes as members statisticians, mathematicians, biological scientists, and others devoted to interdisciplinary efforts in advancing the collection and interpretation of information in the biosciences. The Society sponsors the biennial International Biometric Conference, held in sites throughout the world; through its National Groups and Regions, it also Society sponsors regional and local meetings.
期刊最新文献
Composite dyadic models for spatio-temporal data. ROMI: a randomized two-stage basket trial design to optimize doses for multiple indications. Bayesian network-guided sparse regression with flexible varying effects. Group sequential testing of a treatment effect using a surrogate marker. On network deconvolution for undirected graphs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1