Analysis of participant race and sex reporting and disparities in US epilepsy clinical trials.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1111/epi.18229
Molly Butler, Mario Espinosa Palacios, Christopher Carr, Debra Moore-Hill, Fernando L Vale
{"title":"Analysis of participant race and sex reporting and disparities in US epilepsy clinical trials.","authors":"Molly Butler, Mario Espinosa Palacios, Christopher Carr, Debra Moore-Hill, Fernando L Vale","doi":"10.1111/epi.18229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Studies have shown that a growing number of people with epilepsy belong to minority groups and experience health disparities. Inclusivity in clinical trial enrollment is essential for advancing health access but has not been well studied among epilepsy trials. The objective of this study was to analyze US epilepsy clinical trials to identify the prevalence and trends associated with race and sex enrollment disparities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the Clinicaltrials.gov registry to identify completed epilepsy clinical trials with results reported between 2006 and 2022. Studies were assessed for reporting of participant race and sex information, and measures of trial diversity including the participation to prevalence ratio (PPR), representation ratio (RR), and representation quotient (RQ) were calculated. Other data including funding source, intervention type, location, and trial dates were also extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ninety trials met inclusion criteria, of which 89 (99%) and 53 (59%) reported participant sex and race, respectively. Three trials included only female participants and were excluded from further sex-specific analyses. Females were underrepresented in 10 of the remaining 86 trials reporting sex information (PPR < .8, 12%). We found that industry-funded trials were more likely to have equal female representation among participants (p = .0197). Of trials reporting participant race, 52 (98%) exhibited a lack of racial diversity (RQ < 1). Black participants were the most frequently underrepresented racial group (RR < 1, 42 of 53 trials, 79%).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Our findings highlight significant disparities in epilepsy clinical trial enrollment, particularly for Black participants. Lack of diversity and underrepresentation of historically marginalized populations may contribute to research biases and perpetuate health inequities. More inclusive research practices are needed to ensure all people with epilepsy have access to effective care.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18229","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Studies have shown that a growing number of people with epilepsy belong to minority groups and experience health disparities. Inclusivity in clinical trial enrollment is essential for advancing health access but has not been well studied among epilepsy trials. The objective of this study was to analyze US epilepsy clinical trials to identify the prevalence and trends associated with race and sex enrollment disparities.

Methods: We queried the Clinicaltrials.gov registry to identify completed epilepsy clinical trials with results reported between 2006 and 2022. Studies were assessed for reporting of participant race and sex information, and measures of trial diversity including the participation to prevalence ratio (PPR), representation ratio (RR), and representation quotient (RQ) were calculated. Other data including funding source, intervention type, location, and trial dates were also extracted.

Results: Ninety trials met inclusion criteria, of which 89 (99%) and 53 (59%) reported participant sex and race, respectively. Three trials included only female participants and were excluded from further sex-specific analyses. Females were underrepresented in 10 of the remaining 86 trials reporting sex information (PPR < .8, 12%). We found that industry-funded trials were more likely to have equal female representation among participants (p = .0197). Of trials reporting participant race, 52 (98%) exhibited a lack of racial diversity (RQ < 1). Black participants were the most frequently underrepresented racial group (RR < 1, 42 of 53 trials, 79%).

Significance: Our findings highlight significant disparities in epilepsy clinical trial enrollment, particularly for Black participants. Lack of diversity and underrepresentation of historically marginalized populations may contribute to research biases and perpetuate health inequities. More inclusive research practices are needed to ensure all people with epilepsy have access to effective care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国癫痫临床试验参与者种族和性别报告及差异分析
目的:研究表明,越来越多的癫痫患者属于少数群体,在健康方面存在差异。临床试验注册的包容性对于促进医疗服务的普及至关重要,但对癫痫试验的研究还不够深入。本研究旨在分析美国癫痫临床试验,以确定与种族和性别注册差异相关的普遍性和趋势:我们查询了 Clinicaltrials.gov 注册表,以确定 2006 年至 2022 年间报告结果的已完成癫痫临床试验。我们评估了研究是否报告了参与者的种族和性别信息,并计算了试验多样性的衡量标准,包括参与率与流行率之比(PPR)、代表率(RR)和代表商数(RQ)。此外,还提取了其他数据,包括资金来源、干预类型、地点和试验日期:有 90 项试验符合纳入标准,其中 89 项(99%)和 53 项(59%)分别报告了参与者的性别和种族。有三项试验只纳入了女性参与者,因此在进一步的性别特异性分析中被排除在外。在其余 86 项报告性别信息的试验中,有 10 项试验的女性参与人数不足(PPR < 0.8,12%)。我们发现,由行业资助的试验更有可能在参与者中实现女性比例的平等(P = .0197)。在报告参与者种族的试验中,有 52 项(98%)显示缺乏种族多样性(RQ 意义:我们的研究结果凸显了癫痫临床试验注册方面的显著差异,尤其是黑人参与者。历史上被边缘化的人群缺乏多样性和代表性不足可能会导致研究偏见,并使健康不公平现象长期存在。我们需要更具包容性的研究实践,以确保所有癫痫患者都能获得有效的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Vagus nerve stimulation in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Twenty-four-month data and experience from the CORE-VNS study. Neural mass modeling reveals that hyperexcitability underpins slow-wave sleep changes in children with epilepsy. The role of electroencephalography in epilepsy research-From seizures to interictal activity and comorbidities. Risk of epilepsy following first unprovoked and acute seizures: Cohort study. Evolution in the prescription and cost of non-intravenous rescue benzodiazepines for the treatment of seizure emergencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1