Arketamine: a scoping review of its use in humans.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1007/s00406-024-01945-2
Gustavo C Leal, Isabel Lima-Araújo, David G Roiter, Ana Teresa Caliman-Fontes, Rodrigo P Mello, Flávio Kapczinski, Acioly L T Lacerda, Lucas C Quarantini
{"title":"Arketamine: a scoping review of its use in humans.","authors":"Gustavo C Leal, Isabel Lima-Araújo, David G Roiter, Ana Teresa Caliman-Fontes, Rodrigo P Mello, Flávio Kapczinski, Acioly L T Lacerda, Lucas C Quarantini","doi":"10.1007/s00406-024-01945-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Arketamine (R-ketamine), an enantiomer of ketamine, has historically been less studied than esketamine (S-ketamine) and the racemic mixture. Recent preclinical studies suggest that arketamine may offer prolonged antidepressant effects and a superior safety profile. This scoping review aims to assess and synthesise existing literature on the clinical use of arketamine in humans. This review follows the PRISMA for Scoping Reviews guidelines, with a comprehensive search conducted in PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. Eligible studies included those reporting the administration of arketamine to humans. Data were extracted and synthesised descriptively. A total of 20 studies involving 410 subjects were included. Arketamine was primarily investigated for pain management and depression. While early evidence suggests arketamine may be effective in reducing pain, most studies were small and conducted in non-clinical settings. In psychiatry, trials indicate potential antidepressant effects, but results are inconsistent, and some studies remain unpublished. A consistent observation across most studies is arketamine's favourable safety profile, showing lower incidences of dissociative and psychotomimetic effects compared to esketamine and racemic ketamine. Arketamine may have a role in pain management and psychiatry, with a favourable safety profile compared to other forms of ketamine. However, the small scale of many studies limits the generalizability of findings, and results in depression trials are mixed. Larger, well-designed studies, possibly with higher doses, are needed to determine its therapeutic potential and establish its place in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":11822,"journal":{"name":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00406-024-01945-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Arketamine (R-ketamine), an enantiomer of ketamine, has historically been less studied than esketamine (S-ketamine) and the racemic mixture. Recent preclinical studies suggest that arketamine may offer prolonged antidepressant effects and a superior safety profile. This scoping review aims to assess and synthesise existing literature on the clinical use of arketamine in humans. This review follows the PRISMA for Scoping Reviews guidelines, with a comprehensive search conducted in PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry. Eligible studies included those reporting the administration of arketamine to humans. Data were extracted and synthesised descriptively. A total of 20 studies involving 410 subjects were included. Arketamine was primarily investigated for pain management and depression. While early evidence suggests arketamine may be effective in reducing pain, most studies were small and conducted in non-clinical settings. In psychiatry, trials indicate potential antidepressant effects, but results are inconsistent, and some studies remain unpublished. A consistent observation across most studies is arketamine's favourable safety profile, showing lower incidences of dissociative and psychotomimetic effects compared to esketamine and racemic ketamine. Arketamine may have a role in pain management and psychiatry, with a favourable safety profile compared to other forms of ketamine. However, the small scale of many studies limits the generalizability of findings, and results in depression trials are mixed. Larger, well-designed studies, possibly with higher doses, are needed to determine its therapeutic potential and establish its place in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
154
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The original papers published in the European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience deal with all aspects of psychiatry and related clinical neuroscience. Clinical psychiatry, psychopathology, epidemiology as well as brain imaging, neuropathological, neurophysiological, neurochemical and moleculargenetic studies of psychiatric disorders are among the topics covered. Thus both the clinician and the neuroscientist are provided with a handy source of information on important scientific developments.
期刊最新文献
Sex difference in alexithymia and cognitive impairment in chronic schizophrenia: a large sample study based on Chinese Han population. Arketamine: a scoping review of its use in humans. Salience Network in Autism: preliminary results on functional connectivity analysis in resting state. Thinning of central foveal thickness in the retina of patients with schizophrenia. Correction: Subjective and objective measures of cognitive function are correlated in persons with Post-COVID-19 Condition: a secondary analysis of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1