Unlocking vegetation health: optimizing GEDI data for accurate chlorophyll content estimation.

IF 4.1 2区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES Frontiers in Plant Science Pub Date : 2024-11-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fpls.2024.1492560
Cuifen Xia, Wenwu Zhou, Qingtai Shu, Zaikun Wu, Mingxing Wang, Li Xu, Zhengdao Yang, Jinge Yu, Hanyue Song, Dandan Duan
{"title":"Unlocking vegetation health: optimizing GEDI data for accurate chlorophyll content estimation.","authors":"Cuifen Xia, Wenwu Zhou, Qingtai Shu, Zaikun Wu, Mingxing Wang, Li Xu, Zhengdao Yang, Jinge Yu, Hanyue Song, Dandan Duan","doi":"10.3389/fpls.2024.1492560","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chlorophyll content is a vital indicator for evaluating vegetation health and estimating productivity. This study addresses the issue of Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) data discreteness and explores its potential in estimating chlorophyll content. This study used the empirical Bayesian Kriging regression prediction (EBKRP) method to obtain the continuous distribution of GEDI spot parameters in an unknown space. Initially, 52 measured sample data were employed to screen the modeling parameters with the Pearson and RF methods. Next, the Bayesian optimization (BO) algorithm was applied to optimize the KNN regression model, RFR model, and Gradient Boosting Regression Tree (GBRT) model. These steps were taken to establish the most effective RS estimation model for chlorophyll content in <i>Dendrocalamus giganteus</i> (<i>D. giganteus</i>). The results showed that: (1) The <i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> of the EBKRP method was 0.34~0.99, RMSE was 0.012~3,134.005, rRMSE was 0.011~0.854, and CRPS was 965.492~1,626.887. (2) The Pearson method selects five parameters (cover, pai, fhd_normal, rv, and rx_energy_a3) with a correlation greater than 0.37. The RF method opts for five parameters (cover, fhd_normal, sensitivity, rh100, and modis_nonvegetated) with a contribution threshold greater than 5.5%. (3) The BO-GBRT model in the RF method was used as the best estimation model (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.86, RMSE = 0.219 g/m<sup>2</sup>, rRMSE = 0.167 g/m<sup>2</sup>, <i>p</i> = 84.13%) to estimate and map the chlorophyll content of <i>D. giganteus</i> in the study area. The distribution range is 0.20~2.50 g/m<sup>2</sup>. The findings aligned with the distribution of <i>D. giganteus</i> in the experimental area, indicating the reliability of estimating forest biochemical parameters using GEDI data.</p>","PeriodicalId":12632,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Plant Science","volume":"15 ","pages":"1492560"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11638747/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Plant Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2024.1492560","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chlorophyll content is a vital indicator for evaluating vegetation health and estimating productivity. This study addresses the issue of Global Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI) data discreteness and explores its potential in estimating chlorophyll content. This study used the empirical Bayesian Kriging regression prediction (EBKRP) method to obtain the continuous distribution of GEDI spot parameters in an unknown space. Initially, 52 measured sample data were employed to screen the modeling parameters with the Pearson and RF methods. Next, the Bayesian optimization (BO) algorithm was applied to optimize the KNN regression model, RFR model, and Gradient Boosting Regression Tree (GBRT) model. These steps were taken to establish the most effective RS estimation model for chlorophyll content in Dendrocalamus giganteus (D. giganteus). The results showed that: (1) The R 2 of the EBKRP method was 0.34~0.99, RMSE was 0.012~3,134.005, rRMSE was 0.011~0.854, and CRPS was 965.492~1,626.887. (2) The Pearson method selects five parameters (cover, pai, fhd_normal, rv, and rx_energy_a3) with a correlation greater than 0.37. The RF method opts for five parameters (cover, fhd_normal, sensitivity, rh100, and modis_nonvegetated) with a contribution threshold greater than 5.5%. (3) The BO-GBRT model in the RF method was used as the best estimation model (R 2 = 0.86, RMSE = 0.219 g/m2, rRMSE = 0.167 g/m2, p = 84.13%) to estimate and map the chlorophyll content of D. giganteus in the study area. The distribution range is 0.20~2.50 g/m2. The findings aligned with the distribution of D. giganteus in the experimental area, indicating the reliability of estimating forest biochemical parameters using GEDI data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
揭示植被健康状况:优化 GEDI 数据,准确估算叶绿素含量。
叶绿素含量是评价植被健康和估算植被生产力的重要指标。本研究解决了全球生态系统动力学调查(GEDI)数据离散性的问题,并探讨了其在估算叶绿素含量方面的潜力。本研究采用经验贝叶斯Kriging回归预测(EBKRP)方法获得了GEDI点参数在未知空间中的连续分布。首先,利用52个实测样本数据,用Pearson和RF方法筛选建模参数。其次,应用贝叶斯优化算法对KNN回归模型、RFR模型和梯度增强回归树(GBRT)模型进行优化。为建立最有效的巨菖蒲叶绿素含量遥感估测模型,采用了上述步骤。结果表明:(1)EBKRP方法的r2范围为0.34~0.99,RMSE范围为0.012~3,134.005,rRMSE范围为0.011~0.854,CRPS范围为965.492~1,626.887。(2) Pearson方法选取相关性大于0.37的5个参数(cover、pai、fhd_normal、rv、rx_energy_a3)。RF方法选择贡献阈值大于5.5%的5个参数(cover、fhd_normal、sensitivity、rh100和modis_nonvegeated)。(3)采用RF法中的BO-GBRT模型作为最佳估算模型(r2 = 0.86, RMSE = 0.219 g/m2, rRMSE = 0.167 g/m2, p = 84.13%)估算和绘制研究区巨巨藻叶绿素含量。分布范围为0.20~2.50 g/m2。这一结果与实验区域巨角龙葵的分布一致,表明利用GEDI数据估算森林生化参数的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Plant Science
Frontiers in Plant Science PLANT SCIENCES-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
4844
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: In an ever changing world, plant science is of the utmost importance for securing the future well-being of humankind. Plants provide oxygen, food, feed, fibers, and building materials. In addition, they are a diverse source of industrial and pharmaceutical chemicals. Plants are centrally important to the health of ecosystems, and their understanding is critical for learning how to manage and maintain a sustainable biosphere. Plant science is extremely interdisciplinary, reaching from agricultural science to paleobotany, and molecular physiology to ecology. It uses the latest developments in computer science, optics, molecular biology and genomics to address challenges in model systems, agricultural crops, and ecosystems. Plant science research inquires into the form, function, development, diversity, reproduction, evolution and uses of both higher and lower plants and their interactions with other organisms throughout the biosphere. Frontiers in Plant Science welcomes outstanding contributions in any field of plant science from basic to applied research, from organismal to molecular studies, from single plant analysis to studies of populations and whole ecosystems, and from molecular to biophysical to computational approaches. Frontiers in Plant Science publishes articles on the most outstanding discoveries across a wide research spectrum of Plant Science. The mission of Frontiers in Plant Science is to bring all relevant Plant Science areas together on a single platform.
期刊最新文献
Cotton boll extraction and single-boll weight estimation based on UAV multispectral imagery. Elevation-dependent productivity trade-offs in wild Elymus sibiricus populations across the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau zone. Dynamic physiological response of Mongolian pine ectomycorrhizal seedlings to drought and re-watering. Enclosure enhances grassland plant diversity and community stability more effectively than grazing and mowing by strengthening species turnover regulation and soil process driving. All roads lead to Rome: integrated physiological and transcriptomic analysis of cacao drought response reveals different ways to achieve tolerance in two hybrid clones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1