The psychological impact of COVID-19 on front-line healthcare providers in the United Arab Emirates: A cross-sectional study.

IF 1.4 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Journal of Education and Health Promotion Pub Date : 2024-09-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jehp.jehp_1734_23
Mohannad AlJaberi, Rami A Elshatarat, Murad A Sawalha, Nathira Al Hmaimat, Halima AlBlooshi, Mahra Alshehhi, Ateya M Ibrahim, Donia E Zaghamir, Zyad T Saleh, Ahmad Rajeh Saifan
{"title":"The psychological impact of COVID-19 on front-line healthcare providers in the United Arab Emirates: A cross-sectional study.","authors":"Mohannad AlJaberi, Rami A Elshatarat, Murad A Sawalha, Nathira Al Hmaimat, Halima AlBlooshi, Mahra Alshehhi, Ateya M Ibrahim, Donia E Zaghamir, Zyad T Saleh, Ahmad Rajeh Saifan","doi":"10.4103/jehp.jehp_1734_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the psychological well-being of healthcare providers (HCPs) worldwide. Understanding the prevalence and associated factors of depression, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among these providers is crucial. Assess the prevalence of major depression, GAD, and PTSD symptoms among HCPs in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, this study sought to identify demographic, work-related, and health-related factors associated with these psychological symptoms.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey involving 992 HCPs across various healthcare institutions in the UAE was conducted. Participants were administered standardized assessment tools, including the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression, the GAD-7) for GAD, and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) for PTSD. Independent <i>t</i>-tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were employed to assess the prevalence and associated factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The findings revealed that approximately 19% of the participants exhibited significant symptoms of major depression (PHQ-9 ≥10), while 57.1% reported no significant anxiety symptoms, and 54.4% displayed minimal or no significant PTSD symptoms. Participants with COVID-19, family infections, and work overload showed higher depression, GAD, and PTSD symptoms. Married in-hospital workers significantly differed from single prehospital workers in psychological symptoms. Occupation, level of education, working department, and age significantly influenced the perceived severity of depression, GAD, and PTSD symptoms. Specifically, the ANOVA test revealed significant differences in depression (F = 3.01, <i>P</i> < 0.05), GAD (F = 11.4, <i>P</i> < 0.001), and PTSD symptoms (F = 3.6, <i>P</i> < 0.05) based on occupation. Nurses had higher depression (5.8 ± 7.4) and GAD (7.4 ± 6.6) scores, while physicians had elevated PTSD symptoms (22.4 ± 21.0). Participants with a bachelor's degree had significantly higher depression (7.0 ± 8.4), GAD (7.2 ± 7.4), and PTSD symptoms (22.9 ± 24.6) than those with diplomas or postgraduate degrees. In the intensive care unit (ICU), higher levels of depression (9.3 ± 9.1), GAD (7.6 ± 7.5), and PTSD symptoms (24.7 ± 25.4) were reported. Participants at the screening center had higher depression (5.4 ± 4.7) and PTSD symptoms (15.2 ± 16.8) than those in other prehospital departments. However, participants in PHCs reported higher levels of GAD symptoms (5.8 ± 7.1) compared to those at screening centers, and EMTs. Concerning age groups, participants between 50 and 60 years old experienced more depressive symptoms (8.3 ± 6.7), while those aged 40-49 reported higher GAD (8.5 ± 7.3) and PTSD symptoms (27.0 ± 19.0).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the importance of proactive mental health support and tailored interventions for HCPs. It highlights the need for workload management and work-life balance, as well as personalized support for those directly affected by COVID-19. Moreover, it emphasizes the significance of pandemic preparedness and comprehensive training for HCPs. The study findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the diverse factors influencing the psychological well-being of HCPs during public health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":15581,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","volume":"13 ","pages":"335"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11639421/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Education and Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_1734_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted the psychological well-being of healthcare providers (HCPs) worldwide. Understanding the prevalence and associated factors of depression, generalized anxiety disorder (GAD), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) among these providers is crucial. Assess the prevalence of major depression, GAD, and PTSD symptoms among HCPs in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Additionally, this study sought to identify demographic, work-related, and health-related factors associated with these psychological symptoms.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional survey involving 992 HCPs across various healthcare institutions in the UAE was conducted. Participants were administered standardized assessment tools, including the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression, the GAD-7) for GAD, and the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) for PTSD. Independent t-tests and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) were employed to assess the prevalence and associated factors.

Results: The findings revealed that approximately 19% of the participants exhibited significant symptoms of major depression (PHQ-9 ≥10), while 57.1% reported no significant anxiety symptoms, and 54.4% displayed minimal or no significant PTSD symptoms. Participants with COVID-19, family infections, and work overload showed higher depression, GAD, and PTSD symptoms. Married in-hospital workers significantly differed from single prehospital workers in psychological symptoms. Occupation, level of education, working department, and age significantly influenced the perceived severity of depression, GAD, and PTSD symptoms. Specifically, the ANOVA test revealed significant differences in depression (F = 3.01, P < 0.05), GAD (F = 11.4, P < 0.001), and PTSD symptoms (F = 3.6, P < 0.05) based on occupation. Nurses had higher depression (5.8 ± 7.4) and GAD (7.4 ± 6.6) scores, while physicians had elevated PTSD symptoms (22.4 ± 21.0). Participants with a bachelor's degree had significantly higher depression (7.0 ± 8.4), GAD (7.2 ± 7.4), and PTSD symptoms (22.9 ± 24.6) than those with diplomas or postgraduate degrees. In the intensive care unit (ICU), higher levels of depression (9.3 ± 9.1), GAD (7.6 ± 7.5), and PTSD symptoms (24.7 ± 25.4) were reported. Participants at the screening center had higher depression (5.4 ± 4.7) and PTSD symptoms (15.2 ± 16.8) than those in other prehospital departments. However, participants in PHCs reported higher levels of GAD symptoms (5.8 ± 7.1) compared to those at screening centers, and EMTs. Concerning age groups, participants between 50 and 60 years old experienced more depressive symptoms (8.3 ± 6.7), while those aged 40-49 reported higher GAD (8.5 ± 7.3) and PTSD symptoms (27.0 ± 19.0).

Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of proactive mental health support and tailored interventions for HCPs. It highlights the need for workload management and work-life balance, as well as personalized support for those directly affected by COVID-19. Moreover, it emphasizes the significance of pandemic preparedness and comprehensive training for HCPs. The study findings contribute to a deeper understanding of the diverse factors influencing the psychological well-being of HCPs during public health crises.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 对阿拉伯联合酋长国一线医疗服务提供者的心理影响:横断面研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
21.40%
发文量
218
审稿时长
34 weeks
期刊最新文献
Development of a minimum data set for a blockchain-based personal health records (PHRs), for patient/physician interaction in family medicine. Development of occupational well-being measurement model in the employee of Abadan University of Medical Sciences. Flipping the script: The benefits of inverted classrooms in oncology education. Health literacy and tobacco cessation among hypertensive individuals: A mixed method study. Implementation and evaluation of the impact of virtual workshops of voluntary educational assistance among occupational health and safety students: Case study, Ardabil, Iran.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1