Exploring children's preferences for graphic symbols to represent pain-related words.

Paediatric & neonatal pain Pub Date : 2024-10-14 eCollection Date: 2024-12-01 DOI:10.1002/pne2.12128
Ensa Johnson, Nina Swanepoel, Gunilla Thunberg
{"title":"Exploring children's preferences for graphic symbols to represent pain-related words.","authors":"Ensa Johnson, Nina Swanepoel, Gunilla Thunberg","doi":"10.1002/pne2.12128","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children who are hospitalized may sometimes not be able to communicate verbally to self-report their pain or other symptoms due to medical conditions, medical interventions, or communication difficulties. As such, these children may need other means, such as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) strategies, in this case, graphic symbols, to express their pain-related experiences and receive applicable treatment. Choosing suitable graphic symbols to represent pain-related words contributes to the effective use and implementation of visual support. This study explored the preferences of 6.0-9.11-year-old (years; months) children with typical development regarding graphic symbols to represent pain-related words. These symbols were selected from two commonly used and widespread symbol resources: Picture Communication Symbols (PCS®) and Aragonese Portal of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ARASAAC) symbols. A descriptive, quantitative study design was employed, including a total of 30 typically developed South African children. Data were collected by means of an electronic questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Probability values were determined and predictions, as well as inferences, were implemented. The results showed that the children preferred ARASAAC symbols to represent most pain-related words (<i>p</i> < 0.001). It is important to consider stakeholders' (in this case, children's) input on their preferences in designing communication support to enable participation during the clinical decision-making process.</p>","PeriodicalId":94166,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","volume":"6 4","pages":"174-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645971/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children who are hospitalized may sometimes not be able to communicate verbally to self-report their pain or other symptoms due to medical conditions, medical interventions, or communication difficulties. As such, these children may need other means, such as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) strategies, in this case, graphic symbols, to express their pain-related experiences and receive applicable treatment. Choosing suitable graphic symbols to represent pain-related words contributes to the effective use and implementation of visual support. This study explored the preferences of 6.0-9.11-year-old (years; months) children with typical development regarding graphic symbols to represent pain-related words. These symbols were selected from two commonly used and widespread symbol resources: Picture Communication Symbols (PCS®) and Aragonese Portal of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ARASAAC) symbols. A descriptive, quantitative study design was employed, including a total of 30 typically developed South African children. Data were collected by means of an electronic questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Probability values were determined and predictions, as well as inferences, were implemented. The results showed that the children preferred ARASAAC symbols to represent most pain-related words (p < 0.001). It is important to consider stakeholders' (in this case, children's) input on their preferences in designing communication support to enable participation during the clinical decision-making process.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索儿童对图形符号表示疼痛相关单词的偏好。
由于医疗条件、医疗干预或交流障碍,住院儿童有时可能无法通过语言交流来自我报告疼痛或其他症状。因此,这些儿童可能需要其他方式,如辅助和替代性交流(AAC)策略,在本例中就是图形符号,来表达他们与疼痛相关的经历并接受相应的治疗。选择合适的图形符号来表示与疼痛有关的词语有助于有效使用和实施视觉支持。本研究探讨了 6.0-9.11 岁(岁;月)典型发育儿童对表示疼痛相关词语的图形符号的偏好。这些符号选自两个常用且广泛使用的符号资源:图片交流符号 (PCS®) 和阿拉贡辅助和替代性交流门户 (ARASAAC) 符号。研究采用了描述性定量研究设计,共包括 30 名发育典型的南非儿童。数据通过电子问卷收集,并使用描述性和推论性统计方法进行分析。确定了概率值,并进行了预测和推论。结果显示,儿童更喜欢用 ARASAAC 符号来表示大多数与疼痛有关的词语(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploring children's preferences for graphic symbols to represent pain-related words. Prolonged magnesium sulfate infusion as adjuvant analgesia in postoperative transplant patients in the pediatric ICU: Preliminary results of a feasibility study. Prompt again: How consistently useful are artificial intelligence chatbot responses when prompted with concerns about the reality of paediatric chronic pain? Cold and vibration for children undergoing needle-related procedures: A non-inferiority randomized clinical trial. Perceived distress due to nasopharyngeal swab collection: Correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1