Pub Date : 2024-10-14eCollection Date: 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1002/pne2.12128
Ensa Johnson, Nina Swanepoel, Gunilla Thunberg
Children who are hospitalized may sometimes not be able to communicate verbally to self-report their pain or other symptoms due to medical conditions, medical interventions, or communication difficulties. As such, these children may need other means, such as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) strategies, in this case, graphic symbols, to express their pain-related experiences and receive applicable treatment. Choosing suitable graphic symbols to represent pain-related words contributes to the effective use and implementation of visual support. This study explored the preferences of 6.0-9.11-year-old (years; months) children with typical development regarding graphic symbols to represent pain-related words. These symbols were selected from two commonly used and widespread symbol resources: Picture Communication Symbols (PCS®) and Aragonese Portal of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ARASAAC) symbols. A descriptive, quantitative study design was employed, including a total of 30 typically developed South African children. Data were collected by means of an electronic questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Probability values were determined and predictions, as well as inferences, were implemented. The results showed that the children preferred ARASAAC symbols to represent most pain-related words (p < 0.001). It is important to consider stakeholders' (in this case, children's) input on their preferences in designing communication support to enable participation during the clinical decision-making process.
{"title":"Exploring children's preferences for graphic symbols to represent pain-related words.","authors":"Ensa Johnson, Nina Swanepoel, Gunilla Thunberg","doi":"10.1002/pne2.12128","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pne2.12128","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Children who are hospitalized may sometimes not be able to communicate verbally to self-report their pain or other symptoms due to medical conditions, medical interventions, or communication difficulties. As such, these children may need other means, such as augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) strategies, in this case, graphic symbols, to express their pain-related experiences and receive applicable treatment. Choosing suitable graphic symbols to represent pain-related words contributes to the effective use and implementation of visual support. This study explored the preferences of 6.0-9.11-year-old (years; months) children with typical development regarding graphic symbols to represent pain-related words. These symbols were selected from two commonly used and widespread symbol resources: Picture Communication Symbols (PCS®) and Aragonese Portal of Augmentative and Alternative Communication (ARASAAC) symbols. A descriptive, quantitative study design was employed, including a total of 30 typically developed South African children. Data were collected by means of an electronic questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Probability values were determined and predictions, as well as inferences, were implemented. The results showed that the children preferred ARASAAC symbols to represent most pain-related words (<i>p</i> < 0.001). It is important to consider stakeholders' (in this case, children's) input on their preferences in designing communication support to enable participation during the clinical decision-making process.</p>","PeriodicalId":94166,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","volume":"6 4","pages":"174-193"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645971/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142831532","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-08-13eCollection Date: 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1002/pne2.12131
Joseph C Resch, Shelby Graf, Ranad Ghalban, Srinath Chinnakotla, Gwenyth Fischer
The opioid crisis has emphasized identification of opioid-sparing analgesics. This study was designed as a prospective trial with retrospective control group to determine feasibility for implementing a high-dose prolonged magnesium sulfate infusion for adjuvant analgesia in the pediatric intensive care unit. Approval was granted for study of children receiving total pancreatectomy with islet cell autotransplantation and liver transplantation ages 3-18 years. Study exclusions were pregnancy, neuromuscular disease, hypersensitivity, preoperative creatinine >1.5 times upper limit normal, arrhythmia or pacemaker presence, and clinician concern. Eleven patients were enrolled between January 2020 and December 2022. Magnesium sulfate bolus (50 mg/kg) followed by intravenous infusion (15 mg/kg/h) was initiated in the operating room and extended postoperatively (maximum 48 h). Serum magnesium levels were monitored serially. To prioritize safety, infusion dose was decreased by 5 mg/kg/h for levels greater than 3.5 mg/dL. Clinical team otherwise followed standard multimodal pain practice. Primary outcome was oral morphine equivalent per kg per day during intensive care course (maximum 7 days). Secondary outcomes focused primarily on magnesium safety, including hemodynamic variables, electrolyte variables, respiratory support, and opioid-related side effects. There were no serious adverse events. Treatment group trended toward slightly higher intravenous fluid requirement (~1 bolus), however no increase in blood product. Treatment and control groups were otherwise comparable in targeted outcomes and overall adverse event profile. Use of a high-dose magnesium sulfate infusion protocol for analgesic postoperative use in select transplant recipients appears feasible for continued optimization of study in the PICU.
{"title":"Prolonged magnesium sulfate infusion as adjuvant analgesia in postoperative transplant patients in the pediatric ICU: Preliminary results of a feasibility study.","authors":"Joseph C Resch, Shelby Graf, Ranad Ghalban, Srinath Chinnakotla, Gwenyth Fischer","doi":"10.1002/pne2.12131","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pne2.12131","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The opioid crisis has emphasized identification of opioid-sparing analgesics. This study was designed as a prospective trial with retrospective control group to determine feasibility for implementing a high-dose prolonged magnesium sulfate infusion for adjuvant analgesia in the pediatric intensive care unit. Approval was granted for study of children receiving total pancreatectomy with islet cell autotransplantation and liver transplantation ages 3-18 years. Study exclusions were pregnancy, neuromuscular disease, hypersensitivity, preoperative creatinine >1.5 times upper limit normal, arrhythmia or pacemaker presence, and clinician concern. Eleven patients were enrolled between January 2020 and December 2022. Magnesium sulfate bolus (50 mg/kg) followed by intravenous infusion (15 mg/kg/h) was initiated in the operating room and extended postoperatively (maximum 48 h). Serum magnesium levels were monitored serially. To prioritize safety, infusion dose was decreased by 5 mg/kg/h for levels greater than 3.5 mg/dL. Clinical team otherwise followed standard multimodal pain practice. Primary outcome was oral morphine equivalent per kg per day during intensive care course (maximum 7 days). Secondary outcomes focused primarily on magnesium safety, including hemodynamic variables, electrolyte variables, respiratory support, and opioid-related side effects. There were no serious adverse events. Treatment group trended toward slightly higher intravenous fluid requirement (~1 bolus), however no increase in blood product. Treatment and control groups were otherwise comparable in targeted outcomes and overall adverse event profile. Use of a high-dose magnesium sulfate infusion protocol for analgesic postoperative use in select transplant recipients appears feasible for continued optimization of study in the PICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":94166,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","volume":"6 4","pages":"203-212"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645970/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142831533","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-24eCollection Date: 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1002/pne2.12129
Joshua W Pate, Rebecca Fechner, Scott D Tagliaferri, Hayley Leake, Bruno Saragiotto
{"title":"Prompt again: How consistently useful are artificial intelligence chatbot responses when prompted with concerns about the reality of paediatric chronic pain?","authors":"Joshua W Pate, Rebecca Fechner, Scott D Tagliaferri, Hayley Leake, Bruno Saragiotto","doi":"10.1002/pne2.12129","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pne2.12129","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":94166,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","volume":"6 4","pages":"111-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645967/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142831535","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-06-22eCollection Date: 2024-12-01DOI: 10.1002/pne2.12125
Ariane Ballard, Christelle Khadra, Olivier Fortin, Estelle Guingo, Evelyne D Trottier, Benoit Bailey, Naveen Poonai, Sylvie Le May
The use of a rapid, easy-to-use intervention could improve needle-related procedural pain management practices in the context of the Emergency Department (ED). As such, the Buzzy device seems to be a promising alternative to topical anesthetics. The aim of this study was to determine if a cold vibrating device was non-inferior to a topical anesthetic cream for pain management in children undergoing needle-related procedures in the ED. In this randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, we enrolled children between 4 and 17 years presenting to the ED and requiring a needle-related procedure. Participants were randomly assigned to either the cold vibrating device or topical anesthetic (4% liposomal lidocaine; standard of care). The primary outcome was the mean difference (MD) in adjusted procedural pain intensity on the 0-10 Color Analogue Scale (CAS), using a non-inferiority margin of 0.70. A total of 352 participants were randomized (cold vibration device n = 176, topical anesthetic cream n = 176). Adjusted procedural pain scores' MD between groups was 0.56 (95% CI:-0.08-1.20) on the CAS, showing that the cold vibrating device was not considered non-inferior to topical anesthetic. The cold vibrating device was not considered non-inferior to the topical anesthetic cream for pain management in children during a needle-related procedure in the ED. As topical anesthetic creams require an application time of 30 min, cost approximately CAD $40.00 per tube, are underused in the ED setting, the cold vibrating device remains a promising alternative as it is a rapid, easy-to-use, and reusable device.
在急诊科(ED)中,使用快速、易用的干预措施可以改善与针刺相关的手术疼痛管理实践。因此,Buzzy 设备似乎有望成为局部麻醉剂的替代品。本研究旨在确定在急诊室接受针刺相关手术的儿童中,冷振动装置的止痛效果是否优于局部麻醉膏。在这项随机对照非劣效性试验中,我们招募了 4 到 17 岁的儿童,他们都是在急诊室接受针刺相关手术的。参与者被随机分配到冷振动装置或局部麻醉剂(4% 脂质体利多卡因;标准护理)中。主要结果是调整后的 0-10 彩色模拟量表(CAS)程序疼痛强度的平均差异(MD),非劣效差为 0.70。共有 352 名参与者接受了随机治疗(冷振动装置 n = 176,局部麻醉膏 n = 176)。调整后的手术疼痛评分在 CAS 上的组间 MD 为 0.56(95% CI:-0.08-1.20),表明冷振装置不被认为是非劣于局部麻醉剂。在急诊室进行与针刺相关的手术时,冷振仪在缓解儿童疼痛方面的效果并不优于外用麻醉膏。由于外用麻醉膏需要 30 分钟的涂抹时间,每管的价格约为 40.00 加元,在急诊室的使用率较低,而冷振装置是一种快速、易于使用且可重复使用的装置,因此仍然是一种很有前景的替代方法。
{"title":"Cold and vibration for children undergoing needle-related procedures: A non-inferiority randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Ariane Ballard, Christelle Khadra, Olivier Fortin, Estelle Guingo, Evelyne D Trottier, Benoit Bailey, Naveen Poonai, Sylvie Le May","doi":"10.1002/pne2.12125","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pne2.12125","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of a rapid, easy-to-use intervention could improve needle-related procedural pain management practices in the context of the Emergency Department (ED). As such, the Buzzy device seems to be a promising alternative to topical anesthetics. The aim of this study was to determine if a cold vibrating device was non-inferior to a topical anesthetic cream for pain management in children undergoing needle-related procedures in the ED. In this randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, we enrolled children between 4 and 17 years presenting to the ED and requiring a needle-related procedure. Participants were randomly assigned to either the cold vibrating device or topical anesthetic (4% liposomal lidocaine; standard of care). The primary outcome was the mean difference (MD) in adjusted procedural pain intensity on the 0-10 Color Analogue Scale (CAS), using a non-inferiority margin of 0.70. A total of 352 participants were randomized (cold vibration device <i>n</i> = 176, topical anesthetic cream <i>n</i> = 176). Adjusted procedural pain scores' MD between groups was 0.56 (95% CI:-0.08-1.20) on the CAS, showing that the cold vibrating device was not considered non-inferior to topical anesthetic. The cold vibrating device was not considered non-inferior to the topical anesthetic cream for pain management in children during a needle-related procedure in the ED. As topical anesthetic creams require an application time of 30 min, cost approximately CAD $40.00 per tube, are underused in the ED setting, the cold vibrating device remains a promising alternative as it is a rapid, easy-to-use, and reusable device.</p>","PeriodicalId":94166,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","volume":"6 4","pages":"164-173"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11645969/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142831531","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The dialogues between children and adolescents and their healthcare providers are essential in managing pain in accordance with the child's interests and wishes. It can, however, be challenging to ensure that pain management is in the child's best interest due to a myriad of reasons. One of these relates to the specific communicative challenges that exist in this population, that might arise because of the child's level of development, including receptive and expressive communication skills, the particular illness and treatment (e.g., tracheotomy), distress, and/or disabilities. It is therefore unsurprising that children and adolescents are regarded as vulnerable groups in pediatric healthcare. The importance of using person-centred care has been emphasized in healthcare to facilitate the voices of children and young people and as a way in which their views can be respected. The use of person-centred care promotes the child and adolescent's narratives and emphasizes the use of shared decision-making to be the primary source of pain management decisions.1 This approach is also in line with the United Nation's Convention on the Rights of the Child,2 and specifically with Article 24 that focusses on health. Other articles of this convention also apply. For example, Article 12 highlights respect for children's views and allows them the opportunity to give their opinions freely, specifically about issues that directly affect them. In addition, Article 13 emphasizes children's right to share their thoughts freely in terms of what they learn, think, and feel and that this can be done by talking, drawing, or writing. The nexus between these two articles and person-centred care is thus clear. Likewise, Article 17, which focusses on access to information from the Internet, radio, television, newspapers, books, etcetera, is equally relevant. Article 17 also urges adults (in this case healthcare providers) to ensure that the information provided to children is not harmful and that it is in a language format that all children can understand. Previous research has demonstrated that parent's assessments of pain symptoms in children and adolescents differ from the child's and adolescent's own assessment.3 Self-reports of the evaluation of pain management should be the first choice in pediatric healthcare. However, children's rights, as described above, are not always prioritized, and healthcare provider's own measurements often guide the decision-making around children and adolescents´ pain management.4 This means that it is necessary to develop and implement new strategies that optimize shared decision-making in pediatric healthcare. In an attempt to allow children and adolescents to take on a greater role in their own pain management, new tools and interventions are required to support acute and chronic pain measurement and treatment. This special issue includes five papers that showcase and expand knowledge about children's rights in pain management. Articles
{"title":"Special issue on “Children's and adolescents' rights to participate in their pain management”","authors":"Juan Bornman, Stefan Nilsson","doi":"10.1002/pne2.12116","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12116","url":null,"abstract":"The dialogues between children and adolescents and their healthcare providers are essential in managing pain in accordance with the child's interests and wishes. It can, however, be challenging to ensure that pain management is in the child's best interest due to a myriad of reasons. One of these relates to the specific communicative challenges that exist in this population, that might arise because of the child's level of development, including receptive and expressive communication skills, the particular illness and treatment (e.g., tracheotomy), distress, and/or disabilities. It is therefore unsurprising that children and adolescents are regarded as vulnerable groups in pediatric healthcare. The importance of using person-centred care has been emphasized in healthcare to facilitate the voices of children and young people and as a way in which their views can be respected. The use of person-centred care promotes the child and adolescent's narratives and emphasizes the use of shared decision-making to be the primary source of pain management decisions.1 This approach is also in line with the United Nation's Convention on the Rights of the Child,2 and specifically with Article 24 that focusses on health. Other articles of this convention also apply. For example, Article 12 highlights respect for children's views and allows them the opportunity to give their opinions freely, specifically about issues that directly affect them. In addition, Article 13 emphasizes children's right to share their thoughts freely in terms of what they learn, think, and feel and that this can be done by talking, drawing, or writing. The nexus between these two articles and person-centred care is thus clear. Likewise, Article 17, which focusses on access to information from the Internet, radio, television, newspapers, books, etcetera, is equally relevant. Article 17 also urges adults (in this case healthcare providers) to ensure that the information provided to children is not harmful and that it is in a language format that all children can understand. Previous research has demonstrated that parent's assessments of pain symptoms in children and adolescents differ from the child's and adolescent's own assessment.3 Self-reports of the evaluation of pain management should be the first choice in pediatric healthcare. However, children's rights, as described above, are not always prioritized, and healthcare provider's own measurements often guide the decision-making around children and adolescents´ pain management.4 This means that it is necessary to develop and implement new strategies that optimize shared decision-making in pediatric healthcare. In an attempt to allow children and adolescents to take on a greater role in their own pain management, new tools and interventions are required to support acute and chronic pain measurement and treatment. This special issue includes five papers that showcase and expand knowledge about children's rights in pain management. Articles","PeriodicalId":94166,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","volume":"89 23","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135091750","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) experience social interaction and communication challenges and often display repetitive, restricted patterns of behavior, activities, and interests. The concept of pain is regarded as one of the most complex human stressors due to its subjective and personal nature and the influences of multiple internal and external factors. Due to the complexity of this disorder, it remains concerning how children with ASD communicate their pain and how observers (i.e., parents, carers, and health care practitioners) respond to these children's pain communication. This scoping review aimed to identify how children with ASD communicate or express their pain. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria for further data extraction. Through reflexive thematic analysis, two main themes were identified: verbal and nonverbal responses used by children with ASD to communicate their pain that could influence pain assessment and management strategies. This review highlighted that children with ASD utilized various verbal and nonverbal methods to communicate their pain experiences and that these methods differed compared to children without disabilities. Furthermore, this review emphasizes the importance of holistic pain assessment strategies as well as additional pictorial support for children with ASD. This review recommends that future research should focus on understanding how the inclusion of different stakeholders in pain assessment for children with ASD, can contribute to holistic pain assessment.
{"title":"Pain communication in children with autism spectrum disorder: A scoping review","authors":"Ensa Johnson, Karen van Zijl, Ariné Kuyler","doi":"10.1002/pne2.12115","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pne2.12115","url":null,"abstract":"Children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) experience social interaction and communication challenges and often display repetitive, restricted patterns of behavior, activities, and interests. The concept of pain is regarded as one of the most complex human stressors due to its subjective and personal nature and the influences of multiple internal and external factors. Due to the complexity of this disorder, it remains concerning how children with ASD communicate their pain and how observers (i.e., parents, carers, and health care practitioners) respond to these children's pain communication. This scoping review aimed to identify how children with ASD communicate or express their pain. Ten studies met the inclusion criteria for further data extraction. Through reflexive thematic analysis, two main themes were identified: verbal and nonverbal responses used by children with ASD to communicate their pain that could influence pain assessment and management strategies. This review highlighted that children with ASD utilized various verbal and nonverbal methods to communicate their pain experiences and that these methods differed compared to children without disabilities. Furthermore, this review emphasizes the importance of holistic pain assessment strategies as well as additional pictorial support for children with ASD. This review recommends that future research should focus on understanding how the inclusion of different stakeholders in pain assessment for children with ASD, can contribute to holistic pain assessment.","PeriodicalId":94166,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","volume":"157 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"135856867","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-29eCollection Date: 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1002/pne2.12112
Mia A McLean, Lisa Nakajima, Cecil M Y Chau, Joanne Weinberg, Anne R Synnes, Steven P Miller, Ruth E Grunau
Exposure to pain-related stress from frequent invasive procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) has been associated with altered physiological stress regulation, neurodevelopment, and behavior in children born very preterm (≤32 weeks gestation). Previously, in a cohort born 2003-2006 (Cohort 1), we found that, at 18 months corrected age (CA), children born extremely low gestational age (ELGA; 24-28 weeks) and very low gestational age (VLGA; 29-32 weeks), had higher pre-test cortisol levels and a different pattern of cortisol output across a developmental assessment involving cognitive challenge compared to children born full-term (FT; 39-41 weeks). Also, greater neonatal pain-related stress exposure among the preterm children was related to higher pre-test cortisol levels. Given the adverse long-term effects of neonatal pain in preterm infants and the ensuing rise in clinical concerns to appropriately manage pain in the NICU in recent years, we aimed to examine whether our findings from Cohort 1 would still be evident in an independent cohort (Cohort 2) born 2006-2011 and recruited from the same tertiary NICU in Vancouver, Canada. We also compared the cortisol patterns, clinical and socio-demographic factors, and their interrelationships between the two cohorts. In Cohort 2, our findings using multi-level modeling support and extend our earlier findings in Cohort 1, demonstrating that children born ELGA display higher pre-test cortisol levels than FT. As well, greater cortisol output across assessment was related to more anxiety/depressive behaviors in children born VLGA. Importantly, children born ELGA were exposed to less neonatal pain/stress, mechanical ventilation, and morphine in Cohort 2 than Cohort 1. In both cohorts, however, cortisol levels and patterns were related to neonatal pain/stress and clinical factors (days on mechanical ventilation, overall morphine exposure). Despite less exposure to pain/stress and adverse clinical factors in Cohort 2 compared to Cohort 1, cortisol levels and patterns across cognitive challenge in preterm children at 18-month CA were consistent across the two independent cohorts. These findings highlight that, despite improvements to neonatal care, children born extremely preterm continue to display altered HPA axis activity, which is associated with their poorer neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcomes.
{"title":"Cortisol levels are related to neonatal pain exposure in children born very preterm at age 18 months in two independent cohorts.","authors":"Mia A McLean, Lisa Nakajima, Cecil M Y Chau, Joanne Weinberg, Anne R Synnes, Steven P Miller, Ruth E Grunau","doi":"10.1002/pne2.12112","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pne2.12112","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Exposure to pain-related stress from frequent invasive procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) has been associated with altered physiological stress regulation, neurodevelopment, and behavior in children born very preterm (≤32 weeks gestation). Previously, in a cohort born 2003-2006 (Cohort 1), we found that, at 18 months corrected age (CA), children born extremely low gestational age (ELGA; 24-28 weeks) and very low gestational age (VLGA; 29-32 weeks), had higher pre-test cortisol levels and a different pattern of cortisol output across a developmental assessment involving cognitive challenge compared to children born full-term (FT; 39-41 weeks). Also, greater neonatal pain-related stress exposure among the preterm children was related to higher pre-test cortisol levels. Given the adverse long-term effects of neonatal pain in preterm infants and the ensuing rise in clinical concerns to appropriately manage pain in the NICU in recent years, we aimed to examine whether our findings from Cohort 1 would still be evident in an independent cohort (Cohort 2) born 2006-2011 and recruited from the same tertiary NICU in Vancouver, Canada. We also compared the cortisol patterns, clinical and socio-demographic factors, and their interrelationships between the two cohorts. In Cohort 2, our findings using multi-level modeling support and extend our earlier findings in Cohort 1, demonstrating that children born ELGA display higher pre-test cortisol levels than FT. As well, greater cortisol output across assessment was related to more anxiety/depressive behaviors in children born VLGA. Importantly, children born ELGA were exposed to less neonatal pain/stress, mechanical ventilation, and morphine in Cohort 2 than Cohort 1. In both cohorts, however, cortisol levels and patterns were related to neonatal pain/stress and clinical factors (days on mechanical ventilation, overall morphine exposure). Despite less exposure to pain/stress and adverse clinical factors in Cohort 2 compared to Cohort 1, cortisol levels and patterns across cognitive challenge in preterm children at 18-month CA were consistent across the two independent cohorts. These findings highlight that, despite improvements to neonatal care, children born extremely preterm continue to display altered HPA axis activity, which is associated with their poorer neurodevelopmental and behavioral outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":94166,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","volume":"5 3","pages":"86-95"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/b6/bb/PNE2-5-86.PMC10514780.pdf","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41165619","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-05-25eCollection Date: 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1002/pne2.12107
Sharon Bateman, Line Caes, Christopher Eccleston, Melanie Noel, Abbie Jordan
Long-term health conditions, whether mental or physical, often co-occur in adolescents. For instance, adolescents with chronic pain may experience co-occurring primary psychological disorders. In this scoping review, we determine the influence of co-occurring chronic pain and primary psychological disorders on adolescents' functioning. A systematic search of six databases was conducted to identify articles if they were: (1) peer-reviewed; (2) reported original findings; (3) included participants aged 11-19 years, who experienced chronic pain (i.e., pain lasting 3 months or more) and had a co-occurring diagnosis of a primary psychological disorder; and (4) assessed functioning. Searches returned 9864 articles after the removal of duplicates. A two-phase abstract and full-text screening process identified two eligible articles which compared emotional functioning (n = 1) and social functioning (n = 2) between groups of adolescents with co-occurring chronic pain and primary psychological disorders with adolescents only reporting chronic pain. Overall findings revealed no differences in social functioning, but adolescents with co-occurring chronic pain and a primary psychological disorder (depression and anxiety) reported worse emotional functioning compared with adolescents with chronic pain alone. This review confirms the limited research on the co-occurrence of primary psychological disorders and chronic pain in adolescents by only identifying two eligible articles exploring the co-occurrence of chronic pain with depression, anxiety, and/or attentional disorders.
{"title":"Co-occurring chronic pain and primary psychological disorders in adolescents: A scoping review.","authors":"Sharon Bateman, Line Caes, Christopher Eccleston, Melanie Noel, Abbie Jordan","doi":"10.1002/pne2.12107","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pne2.12107","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long-term health conditions, whether mental or physical, often co-occur in adolescents. For instance, adolescents with chronic pain may experience co-occurring primary psychological disorders. In this scoping review, we determine the influence of co-occurring chronic pain and primary psychological disorders on adolescents' functioning. A systematic search of six databases was conducted to identify articles if they were: (1) peer-reviewed; (2) reported original findings; (3) included participants aged 11-19 years, who experienced chronic pain (i.e., pain lasting 3 months or more) and had a co-occurring diagnosis of a primary psychological disorder; and (4) assessed functioning. Searches returned 9864 articles after the removal of duplicates. A two-phase abstract and full-text screening process identified two eligible articles which compared emotional functioning (<i>n</i> = 1) and social functioning (<i>n</i> = 2) between groups of adolescents with co-occurring chronic pain and primary psychological disorders with adolescents only reporting chronic pain. Overall findings revealed no differences in social functioning, but adolescents with co-occurring chronic pain and a primary psychological disorder (depression and anxiety) reported worse emotional functioning compared with adolescents with chronic pain alone. This review confirms the limited research on the co-occurrence of primary psychological disorders and chronic pain in adolescents by only identifying two eligible articles exploring the co-occurrence of chronic pain with depression, anxiety, and/or attentional disorders.</p>","PeriodicalId":94166,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","volume":"5 3","pages":"57-65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10514777/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41180156","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2023-04-10eCollection Date: 2023-09-01DOI: 10.1002/pne2.12104
Gitte Würtz, Christina Schmidt, Claus Sixtus Jensen, Grete Teilman, Hanne Konradsen
Aim: To explore and compare Danish health-care professionals' attitudes and knowledge towards pain management of children.
Methods: The cross-sectional study was carried out using the Pediatric Pain Knowledge and Attitudes Questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed to all health care professionals caring for children in three hospital settings, including nurses and physicians in departments of pediatric, emergency, and anesthesia and medical laboratory technologists.
Results: The study was conducted in 2020 and 765 health care professionals participated. Within the six main categories included in the questionnaire, there were significant differences between nurses and physicians in three subcategories: view on the care of children in pain, using drugs to relieve pain, and the four mandatories. Comparing nurses with medical laboratory technicians, there were significant differences in the subcategory "view on the care of children in pain." Comparing types of clinical departments, there were significant differences in the subcategories' view on the care of children in pain, using drugs to relieve pain, and the four mandatories. Overall, we found that the participating health professionals did not have a uniform understanding of pain management and therefore might treat children differently.
Conclusion: The present study highlights the need to align health care professionals' knowledge regarding pain assessment and management of children, as well as the need to develop and test interventions that support the use of knowledge in practice.
{"title":"Pediatric pain knowledge and attitudes among health care professionals-A National Danish Survey.","authors":"Gitte Würtz, Christina Schmidt, Claus Sixtus Jensen, Grete Teilman, Hanne Konradsen","doi":"10.1002/pne2.12104","DOIUrl":"10.1002/pne2.12104","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To explore and compare Danish health-care professionals' attitudes and knowledge towards pain management of children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The cross-sectional study was carried out using the Pediatric Pain Knowledge and Attitudes Questionnaire. The questionnaire was distributed to all health care professionals caring for children in three hospital settings, including nurses and physicians in departments of pediatric, emergency, and anesthesia and medical laboratory technologists.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study was conducted in 2020 and 765 health care professionals participated. Within the six main categories included in the questionnaire, there were significant differences between nurses and physicians in three subcategories: view on the care of children in pain, using drugs to relieve pain, and the four mandatories. Comparing nurses with medical laboratory technicians, there were significant differences in the subcategory \"view on the care of children in pain.\" Comparing types of clinical departments, there were significant differences in the subcategories' view on the care of children in pain, using drugs to relieve pain, and the four mandatories. Overall, we found that the participating health professionals did not have a uniform understanding of pain management and therefore might treat children differently.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study highlights the need to align health care professionals' knowledge regarding pain assessment and management of children, as well as the need to develop and test interventions that support the use of knowledge in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":94166,"journal":{"name":"Paediatric & neonatal pain","volume":"5 3","pages":"76-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10514779/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"41159177","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}