Leveraging Stacked Classifiers for Multi-task Executive Function in Schizophrenia Yields Diagnostic and Prognostic Insights.

Tongyi Zhang, Xin Zhao, B T Thomas Yeo, Xiaoning Huo, Simon B Eickhoff, Ji Chen
{"title":"Leveraging Stacked Classifiers for Multi-task Executive Function in Schizophrenia Yields Diagnostic and Prognostic Insights.","authors":"Tongyi Zhang, Xin Zhao, B T Thomas Yeo, Xiaoning Huo, Simon B Eickhoff, Ji Chen","doi":"10.1101/2024.12.05.24318587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Cognitive impairment is a central characteristic of schizophrenia. Executive functioning (EF) impairments are often seen in mental disorders, particularly schizophrenia, where they relate to adverse outcomes. As a heterogeneous construct, how specifically each dimension of EF to characterize the diagnostic and prognostic aspects of schizophrenia remains opaque. We used classification models with a stacking approach on systematically measured EFs to discriminate 195 patients with schizophrenia from healthy individuals. Baseline EF measurements were moreover employed to predict symptomatically remitted or non-remitted prognostic subgroups. EF feature importance was determined at the group-level and the ensuing individual importance scores were associated with four symptom dimensions. EF assessments of inhibitory control (interference and response inhibitions), followed by working memory, evidently predicted schizophrenia diagnosis (area under the curve [AUC]=0.87) and remission status (AUC=0.81). The models highlighted the importance of interference inhibition or working memory updating in accurately identifying individuals with schizophrenia or those in remission. These identified patients had high-level negative symptoms at baseline and those who remitted showed milder cognitive symptoms at follow-up, without differences in baseline EF or symptom severity compared to non-remitted patients. Our work indicates that impairments in specific EF dimensions in schizophrenia are differentially linked to individual symptom-load and prognostic outcomes. Thus, assessments and models based on EF may be a promising tool that can aid in the clinical evaluation of this disorder.</p>","PeriodicalId":94281,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11643294/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.12.05.24318587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive impairment is a central characteristic of schizophrenia. Executive functioning (EF) impairments are often seen in mental disorders, particularly schizophrenia, where they relate to adverse outcomes. As a heterogeneous construct, how specifically each dimension of EF to characterize the diagnostic and prognostic aspects of schizophrenia remains opaque. We used classification models with a stacking approach on systematically measured EFs to discriminate 195 patients with schizophrenia from healthy individuals. Baseline EF measurements were moreover employed to predict symptomatically remitted or non-remitted prognostic subgroups. EF feature importance was determined at the group-level and the ensuing individual importance scores were associated with four symptom dimensions. EF assessments of inhibitory control (interference and response inhibitions), followed by working memory, evidently predicted schizophrenia diagnosis (area under the curve [AUC]=0.87) and remission status (AUC=0.81). The models highlighted the importance of interference inhibition or working memory updating in accurately identifying individuals with schizophrenia or those in remission. These identified patients had high-level negative symptoms at baseline and those who remitted showed milder cognitive symptoms at follow-up, without differences in baseline EF or symptom severity compared to non-remitted patients. Our work indicates that impairments in specific EF dimensions in schizophrenia are differentially linked to individual symptom-load and prognostic outcomes. Thus, assessments and models based on EF may be a promising tool that can aid in the clinical evaluation of this disorder.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用堆叠分类器对精神分裂症患者的多任务执行功能进行诊断和预后分析。
认知障碍是精神分裂症的一个主要特征。执行功能(EF)障碍经常见于精神障碍,尤其是精神分裂症,它们与不良后果有关。作为一种异质性结构,执行功能的每个维度如何具体描述精神分裂症的诊断和预后方面仍不清楚。我们在系统测量的 EFs 基础上,采用堆叠法建立分类模型,将 195 名精神分裂症患者与健康人区分开来。此外,我们还利用基线心率测量结果来预测症状缓解或未缓解的预后亚组。EF特征的重要性是在群体水平上确定的,随后的个体重要性得分与四个症状维度相关联。对抑制控制(干扰抑制和反应抑制)和工作记忆的 EF 评估明显可以预测精神分裂症的诊断(曲线下面积 [AUC]= 0.87)和缓解状态(AUC=0.81)。这些模型强调了干扰抑制或工作记忆更新在准确识别精神分裂症患者或缓解期患者方面的重要性。这些被识别出的患者在基线时有较高程度的阴性症状,而缓解期患者在随访时表现出较轻的认知症状,但与未缓解期患者相比,基线EF或症状严重程度并无差异。我们的研究表明,精神分裂症患者特定EF维度的损伤与个体症状负荷和预后结果有着不同的联系。因此,基于EF的评估和模型可能是一种很有前途的工具,有助于对这种疾病进行临床评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Peer Education Intervention Reduced Sexually Transmitted Infections Among Male Tajik Labor Migrants Who Inject Drugs: Results of a Cluster-randomized Controlled Trial. LD-informed deep learning for Alzheimer's gene loci detection using WGS data. Uncovering causal gene-tissue pairs and variants: A multivariable TWAS method controlling for infinitesimal effects. Unified Clinical Vocabulary Embeddings for Advancing Precision Medicine. Deep phenotyping obesity using EHR data: Promise, Challenges, and Future Directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1