Exploring Nurses' Personal and Professional Values and Care Quality: A Convergent Mixed-Methods Analysis.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Western Journal of Nursing Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1177/01939459241304528
Jeanne Hlebichuk, Rachelle Lancaster, Wendy Tuzik Micek, Susan Perusich, Kerry Fick, Kanagavalli Perumalswamy
{"title":"Exploring Nurses' Personal and Professional Values and Care Quality: A Convergent Mixed-Methods Analysis.","authors":"Jeanne Hlebichuk, Rachelle Lancaster, Wendy Tuzik Micek, Susan Perusich, Kerry Fick, Kanagavalli Perumalswamy","doi":"10.1177/01939459241304528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Professional standards and the Codes of Ethics from the International Council of Nurses and American Nurses Association are frameworks driving professional practice and are linked to positive patient and nursing outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe qualitative themes extracted from narrative responses on how nurses' personal values influence nursing care and converge with quantitative results assessing personal values, professional values, and the practice environment, a key component of nurse satisfaction and subsequent care quality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A convenience sample of nurses across 19 sites within a large nonprofit healthcare system was surveyed. Quantitative measures included the Short Schwartz's Value Survey for personal values, the Nurses Professional Values Scale-3 for professional values, and the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index, assessing practice settings. Concurrently, nurses were asked, \"How do your values influence the care you provide?\" Responses were examined using a descriptive qualitative method for thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The sample included qualitative (n = 408) and quantitative (n = 671) responses. Six qualitative themes emerged: patient-centered care, professionalism/integrity of practice, advocacy, dissonance, golden rule/ethics of reciprocity (religiosity), and perseverance. Themes converged with the mean personal values of achievement, self-direction, universalism, benevolence, tradition, and conformity, and diverged with hedonism, security, and stimulation. All professional values factor means and work environment subscale means converged.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings highlight convergence and divergence between qualitative and quantitative responses from nurses, offering new insights into the themes of dissonance, perseverance, and religiosity. The findings present valuable opportunities to enhance recruitment and retention strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":49365,"journal":{"name":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","volume":" ","pages":"61-70"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Western Journal of Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01939459241304528","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Professional standards and the Codes of Ethics from the International Council of Nurses and American Nurses Association are frameworks driving professional practice and are linked to positive patient and nursing outcomes.

Objective: To describe qualitative themes extracted from narrative responses on how nurses' personal values influence nursing care and converge with quantitative results assessing personal values, professional values, and the practice environment, a key component of nurse satisfaction and subsequent care quality.

Methods: A convenience sample of nurses across 19 sites within a large nonprofit healthcare system was surveyed. Quantitative measures included the Short Schwartz's Value Survey for personal values, the Nurses Professional Values Scale-3 for professional values, and the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index, assessing practice settings. Concurrently, nurses were asked, "How do your values influence the care you provide?" Responses were examined using a descriptive qualitative method for thematic analysis.

Results: The sample included qualitative (n = 408) and quantitative (n = 671) responses. Six qualitative themes emerged: patient-centered care, professionalism/integrity of practice, advocacy, dissonance, golden rule/ethics of reciprocity (religiosity), and perseverance. Themes converged with the mean personal values of achievement, self-direction, universalism, benevolence, tradition, and conformity, and diverged with hedonism, security, and stimulation. All professional values factor means and work environment subscale means converged.

Conclusions: Findings highlight convergence and divergence between qualitative and quantitative responses from nurses, offering new insights into the themes of dissonance, perseverance, and religiosity. The findings present valuable opportunities to enhance recruitment and retention strategies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索护士的个人和职业价值观与护理质量:聚合混合方法分析》(Convergent Mixed-Methods Analysis)。
背景:国际护士理事会和美国护士协会的专业标准和道德准则是推动专业实践的框架,与积极的患者和护理结果息息相关:描述从叙述性回答中提取的关于护士的个人价值观如何影响护理工作的定性主题,并与评估个人价值观、专业价值观和实践环境的定量结果相一致,后者是护士满意度和后续护理质量的关键组成部分:方法:对一家大型非营利性医疗保健系统内 19 个地点的护士进行了方便抽样调查。定量测量包括针对个人价值观的简短施瓦茨价值观调查、针对专业价值观的护士专业价值观量表-3,以及评估实践环境的护理工作指数实践环境量表。同时,护士们还被问到:"您的价值观是如何影响您所提供的护理服务的?采用描述性定性方法对回答进行了主题分析:结果:样本包括定性(n = 408)和定量(n = 671)回答。出现了六个定性主题:以患者为中心的护理、专业精神/实践的完整性、倡导、不和谐、金科玉律/互惠伦理(宗教信仰)和毅力。这些主题与成就、自我导向、普遍主义、仁爱、传统和顺应等个人平均价值观趋同,而与享乐主义、安全感和刺激等个人平均价值观相左。所有职业价值观因子平均值和工作环境分量表平均值趋同:研究结果凸显了护士定性和定量反应之间的趋同和差异,为不和谐、坚持不懈和宗教信仰等主题提供了新的见解。研究结果为加强招聘和留住人才战略提供了宝贵的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Western Journal of Nursing Research (WJNR) is a widely read and respected peer-reviewed journal published twelve times a year providing an innovative forum for nurse researchers, students, and clinical practitioners to participate in ongoing scholarly dialogue. WJNR publishes research reports, systematic reviews, methodology papers, and invited special papers. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Limitations Are Important. Measuring Depressive Symptoms in Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders (ASD): A Scoping Review. Readiness for the Next Pandemic: A Nurse Practitioner-Driven COVID-19 Management Model for Kidney Transplant Recipients. Exploring Nurses' Personal and Professional Values and Care Quality: A Convergent Mixed-Methods Analysis. Effects of Visualized Health Education Based on Health Belief Model on Self-Management of Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1