Investigating passenger behaviour on the metro platform with Wi-Fi location tracking data: a case study of Singapore

IF 3.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Transportation Pub Date : 2024-12-18 DOI:10.1007/s11116-024-10570-w
Michelle Cheung, Yan Cheng, Taku Fujiyama
{"title":"Investigating passenger behaviour on the metro platform with Wi-Fi location tracking data: a case study of Singapore","authors":"Michelle Cheung, Yan Cheng, Taku Fujiyama","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10570-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Utilising the existing infrastructure in railway transit to tackle overcrowding requires more understanding of how people use spaces at stations. This study investigated passenger behaviour while waiting for a train on the platform using the data of the Wi-Fi location tracking systems. The trajectories of 129,354 devices were observed in two weeks at two MRT Circle Line stations in Singapore, which have the escalator/stair landings in different positions. A data cleaning process was proposed to overcome the drawbacks of Wi-Fi-based position data. A decomposition method was further developed to separate the walking and staying phases based on data processing. The boarding passengers’ on-platform behaviour was analysed from four aspects: the number of staying phases, the location distributions of different kinds of stays, the location distribution of in-between stays by hour and duration, and the distance and walking speed of the first walking phase. Our results suggested that many passengers (44% and 37% of passengers at the two case study stations) had multiple staying phases, meaning that they did not go directly to their final boarding points after coming to the platform but rather made stops or walkarounds before coming to boarding points. The distributions of locations of the last and in-between stays were significantly different and may influenced by the width, length and layout (such as landing locations) of stations. In addition, the walking speeds of passengers observed on the metro platform were slower than those observed on the streets. These findings indicated that some commonly used assumptions in most simulation models are not true according to the empirical observation. The obtained knowledge would deepen the understanding of the passengers’ on-platform behaviour and thus provide implications for designing railway stations and planning station operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"831 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10570-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Utilising the existing infrastructure in railway transit to tackle overcrowding requires more understanding of how people use spaces at stations. This study investigated passenger behaviour while waiting for a train on the platform using the data of the Wi-Fi location tracking systems. The trajectories of 129,354 devices were observed in two weeks at two MRT Circle Line stations in Singapore, which have the escalator/stair landings in different positions. A data cleaning process was proposed to overcome the drawbacks of Wi-Fi-based position data. A decomposition method was further developed to separate the walking and staying phases based on data processing. The boarding passengers’ on-platform behaviour was analysed from four aspects: the number of staying phases, the location distributions of different kinds of stays, the location distribution of in-between stays by hour and duration, and the distance and walking speed of the first walking phase. Our results suggested that many passengers (44% and 37% of passengers at the two case study stations) had multiple staying phases, meaning that they did not go directly to their final boarding points after coming to the platform but rather made stops or walkarounds before coming to boarding points. The distributions of locations of the last and in-between stays were significantly different and may influenced by the width, length and layout (such as landing locations) of stations. In addition, the walking speeds of passengers observed on the metro platform were slower than those observed on the streets. These findings indicated that some commonly used assumptions in most simulation models are not true according to the empirical observation. The obtained knowledge would deepen the understanding of the passengers’ on-platform behaviour and thus provide implications for designing railway stations and planning station operations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
要利用现有的轨道交通基础设施来解决拥挤问题,就需要更多地了解人们是如何使用车站空间的。本研究利用 Wi-Fi 定位跟踪系统的数据调查了乘客在站台候车时的行为。研究人员在新加坡两个地铁环线车站的两个星期内观察了 129,354 台设备的运行轨迹,这两个车站的自动扶梯/楼梯着陆点位置各不相同。为了克服基于 Wi-Fi 定位数据的缺点,研究人员提出了一种数据清理方法。在数据处理的基础上,进一步开发了一种分解方法,以分离行走和停留阶段。我们从四个方面分析了登机乘客在站台上的行为:停留阶段的数量、不同类型停留的位置分布、按小时和持续时间划分的中间停留的位置分布以及第一个步行阶段的距离和步行速度。我们的研究结果表明,许多乘客(两个案例研究车站中分别有 44% 和 37% 的乘客)有多个停留阶段,这意味着他们在到达站台后并没有直接前往最终上车点,而是在到达上车点之前进行了停留或绕行。最后停留和中间停留的位置分布差异很大,可能受到车站宽度、长度和布局(如着陆位置)的影响。此外,在地铁站台上观察到的乘客步行速度比在街道上观察到的要慢。这些发现表明,根据经验观察,大多数模拟模型中的一些常用假设并不正确。所获得的知识将加深对乘客在站台上行为的理解,从而为设计铁路车站和规划车站运营提供启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation
Transportation 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
4.70%
发文量
94
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world. These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.
期刊最新文献
Spatial–temporal multi-task learning for short-term passenger inflow and outflow prediction on holidays in urban rail transit systems Comparing structural policies for relieving citywide traffic congestion: longitudinal evidence from 96 Chinese cities Identifying instant utility using psychophysiological indicators in a transport experiment with ecological validity Research on charging patterns of electric taxis based on high-dimensional cluster analysis: a case study of Hangzhou, China A panel analysis of change in personal air travel behaviour in England between 2012 and 2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1