{"title":"Investigating passenger behaviour on the metro platform with Wi-Fi location tracking data: a case study of Singapore","authors":"Michelle Cheung, Yan Cheng, Taku Fujiyama","doi":"10.1007/s11116-024-10570-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Utilising the existing infrastructure in railway transit to tackle overcrowding requires more understanding of how people use spaces at stations. This study investigated passenger behaviour while waiting for a train on the platform using the data of the Wi-Fi location tracking systems. The trajectories of 129,354 devices were observed in two weeks at two MRT Circle Line stations in Singapore, which have the escalator/stair landings in different positions. A data cleaning process was proposed to overcome the drawbacks of Wi-Fi-based position data. A decomposition method was further developed to separate the walking and staying phases based on data processing. The boarding passengers’ on-platform behaviour was analysed from four aspects: the number of staying phases, the location distributions of different kinds of stays, the location distribution of in-between stays by hour and duration, and the distance and walking speed of the first walking phase. Our results suggested that many passengers (44% and 37% of passengers at the two case study stations) had multiple staying phases, meaning that they did not go directly to their final boarding points after coming to the platform but rather made stops or walkarounds before coming to boarding points. The distributions of locations of the last and in-between stays were significantly different and may influenced by the width, length and layout (such as landing locations) of stations. In addition, the walking speeds of passengers observed on the metro platform were slower than those observed on the streets. These findings indicated that some commonly used assumptions in most simulation models are not true according to the empirical observation. The obtained knowledge would deepen the understanding of the passengers’ on-platform behaviour and thus provide implications for designing railway stations and planning station operations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49419,"journal":{"name":"Transportation","volume":"831 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-024-10570-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Utilising the existing infrastructure in railway transit to tackle overcrowding requires more understanding of how people use spaces at stations. This study investigated passenger behaviour while waiting for a train on the platform using the data of the Wi-Fi location tracking systems. The trajectories of 129,354 devices were observed in two weeks at two MRT Circle Line stations in Singapore, which have the escalator/stair landings in different positions. A data cleaning process was proposed to overcome the drawbacks of Wi-Fi-based position data. A decomposition method was further developed to separate the walking and staying phases based on data processing. The boarding passengers’ on-platform behaviour was analysed from four aspects: the number of staying phases, the location distributions of different kinds of stays, the location distribution of in-between stays by hour and duration, and the distance and walking speed of the first walking phase. Our results suggested that many passengers (44% and 37% of passengers at the two case study stations) had multiple staying phases, meaning that they did not go directly to their final boarding points after coming to the platform but rather made stops or walkarounds before coming to boarding points. The distributions of locations of the last and in-between stays were significantly different and may influenced by the width, length and layout (such as landing locations) of stations. In addition, the walking speeds of passengers observed on the metro platform were slower than those observed on the streets. These findings indicated that some commonly used assumptions in most simulation models are not true according to the empirical observation. The obtained knowledge would deepen the understanding of the passengers’ on-platform behaviour and thus provide implications for designing railway stations and planning station operations.
期刊介绍:
In our first issue, published in 1972, we explained that this Journal is intended to promote the free and vigorous exchange of ideas and experience among the worldwide community actively concerned with transportation policy, planning and practice. That continues to be our mission, with a clear focus on topics concerned with research and practice in transportation policy and planning, around the world.
These four words, policy and planning, research and practice are our key words. While we have a particular focus on transportation policy analysis and travel behaviour in the context of ground transportation, we willingly consider all good quality papers that are highly relevant to transportation policy, planning and practice with a clear focus on innovation, on extending the international pool of knowledge and understanding. Our interest is not only with transportation policies - and systems and services – but also with their social, economic and environmental impacts, However, papers about the application of established procedures to, or the development of plans or policies for, specific locations are unlikely to prove acceptable unless they report experience which will be of real benefit those working elsewhere. Papers concerned with the engineering, safety and operational management of transportation systems are outside our scope.