Effect of fumigation, cover crops, and potato growth on shifts in soil microbial communities.

IF 8 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Science of the Total Environment Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-17 DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178032
Julie Celini, Ruijun Qin, Shahram Torabian, Esther Kim, Yan Liu
{"title":"Effect of fumigation, cover crops, and potato growth on shifts in soil microbial communities.","authors":"Julie Celini, Ruijun Qin, Shahram Torabian, Esther Kim, Yan Liu","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fumigation as a broad-spectrum pesticide can affect both pathogenic and non-target microorganisms in the soil. As microbial communities are critical within the soil ecosystem, depletion of or changes in these communities can result in negative implications for soil health. Because cover crops are used to enhance soil health physically, chemically, and biologically, they might recover the soil health of the fumigated soil. However, little information is available on the interactive effect of these practices on soil health especially regarding the soil microbiome. This study was to investigate microbial community shifts as affected by fumigation and cover crops in different stages of potato field management practices. A year-long field test was conducted in Adkins sandy loam of Eastern Oregon following a split-plot design with fumigation as main plots and cover crops as subplots. Fumigation treatments included non-fumigated control, metam sodium, 1,3-dichloropropenene, and metam sodium+1,3-dichloropropenene. Soil samples were collected around the termination of cover crops and after potato harvesting for soil microbial analysis. 16S and ITS rRNA- gene sequencing analyses were employed to understand the prokaryote and eukaryote populations, respectively. Microbial community analysis indicated no significant interaction between the treatment conditions, with cover crops resulting in no significant shifts in the soil microbial community. Combination fumigation treatments (metam sodium+1,3-dichloropropenene) resulted in the largest community shifts for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic communities, with significant abundance changes in the bacterial phyla Acidobacteriota, Planctomycetota, and Verrucomicrobiota and the eukaryotic phyla Ascomycota and Basidiomycota compared with no fumigation control; and these changes did not repeat from cover crop planting, although subsequent years of study are needed to establish definitive trends in community shifts.</p>","PeriodicalId":422,"journal":{"name":"Science of the Total Environment","volume":"958 ","pages":"178032"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of the Total Environment","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.178032","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fumigation as a broad-spectrum pesticide can affect both pathogenic and non-target microorganisms in the soil. As microbial communities are critical within the soil ecosystem, depletion of or changes in these communities can result in negative implications for soil health. Because cover crops are used to enhance soil health physically, chemically, and biologically, they might recover the soil health of the fumigated soil. However, little information is available on the interactive effect of these practices on soil health especially regarding the soil microbiome. This study was to investigate microbial community shifts as affected by fumigation and cover crops in different stages of potato field management practices. A year-long field test was conducted in Adkins sandy loam of Eastern Oregon following a split-plot design with fumigation as main plots and cover crops as subplots. Fumigation treatments included non-fumigated control, metam sodium, 1,3-dichloropropenene, and metam sodium+1,3-dichloropropenene. Soil samples were collected around the termination of cover crops and after potato harvesting for soil microbial analysis. 16S and ITS rRNA- gene sequencing analyses were employed to understand the prokaryote and eukaryote populations, respectively. Microbial community analysis indicated no significant interaction between the treatment conditions, with cover crops resulting in no significant shifts in the soil microbial community. Combination fumigation treatments (metam sodium+1,3-dichloropropenene) resulted in the largest community shifts for both prokaryotic and eukaryotic communities, with significant abundance changes in the bacterial phyla Acidobacteriota, Planctomycetota, and Verrucomicrobiota and the eukaryotic phyla Ascomycota and Basidiomycota compared with no fumigation control; and these changes did not repeat from cover crop planting, although subsequent years of study are needed to establish definitive trends in community shifts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
熏蒸、覆盖作物和马铃薯生长对土壤微生物群落变化的影响。
熏蒸作为一种广谱农药,对土壤中的病原微生物和非目标微生物都有影响。由于微生物群落在土壤生态系统中至关重要,这些群落的枯竭或变化可能对土壤健康产生负面影响。由于覆盖作物被用于增强土壤的物理、化学和生物健康,它们可能会恢复熏蒸土壤的土壤健康。然而,关于这些做法对土壤健康,特别是对土壤微生物组的相互作用的信息很少。本研究旨在探讨马铃薯田间管理不同阶段熏蒸和覆盖作物对微生物群落变化的影响。在俄勒冈州东部的阿德金斯砂壤土上进行了为期一年的田间试验,采用以熏蒸为主、覆盖作物为辅的分块设计。熏蒸处理包括非熏蒸对照、元钠、1,3-二氯丙烯和元钠+1,3-二氯丙烯。在覆盖作物终止前后和马铃薯收获后采集土壤样品进行土壤微生物分析。采用16S和ITS rRNA-基因测序分析分别了解原核生物和真核生物群体。微生物群落分析表明,不同处理间无显著交互作用,覆盖作物对土壤微生物群落影响不显著。联合熏蒸处理(元钠+1,3-二氯丙烯)对原核和真核菌群的群落变化最大,与不熏蒸对照相比,真核菌门酸菌门、植物菌门和疣菌门以及子囊菌门和担子菌门的丰度发生了显著变化;这些变化并没有从覆盖作物种植中重复出现,尽管需要随后几年的研究来确定群落变化的明确趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science of the Total Environment
Science of the Total Environment 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
10.20%
发文量
8726
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The Science of the Total Environment is an international journal dedicated to scientific research on the environment and its interaction with humanity. It covers a wide range of disciplines and seeks to publish innovative, hypothesis-driven, and impactful research that explores the entire environment, including the atmosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere, biosphere, and anthroposphere. The journal's updated Aims & Scope emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary environmental research with broad impact. Priority is given to studies that advance fundamental understanding and explore the interconnectedness of multiple environmental spheres. Field studies are preferred, while laboratory experiments must demonstrate significant methodological advancements or mechanistic insights with direct relevance to the environment.
期刊最新文献
Predicting non-mixing river flow using data-driven approaches: A case study in the Menindee region in Australia. A comprehensive review on microplastics: Their presence in surface and ground water, environmental distribution, and impact on human and aquatic systems. Childhood exposure to multiple persistent organic pollutants and midlife cognitive function. Impact of cellulose digestion on the accuracy and reproducibility of microplastic and synthetic microfiber quantification. Organic carbon composition and preservation in macrotidal coastal wetland sediment: insights from biomarkers and isotopic signatures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1