Age effect in asymptomatic carotid stenosis in the CREST and ACT 1 stenting vs endarterectomy trials.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-16 DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.008
Jenifer H Voeks, Bret Hanlon, Thomas G Brott, Jon S Matsumura, Ken Rosenfield, Gary S Roubin, George Howard
{"title":"Age effect in asymptomatic carotid stenosis in the CREST and ACT 1 stenting vs endarterectomy trials.","authors":"Jenifer H Voeks, Bret Hanlon, Thomas G Brott, Jon S Matsumura, Ken Rosenfield, Gary S Roubin, George Howard","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We assessed if age was an effect modifier in a pooled analysis of two randomized trials comparing carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in asymptomatic patients, CREST and ACT 1.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyzed data from 2544 patients aged <80 yearas with ≥70% asymptomatic carotid stenosis randomized to CAS or CEA (n<sub>CREST</sub> = 1091; n<sub>ACT 1</sub> = 1453) who were recruited between 2000 and 2013. Age was considered in four strata (<65, 65-69, 70-74, and 75-79 years). The primary outcome was any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during the peri-procedural period, or ipsilateral stroke afterwards. The secondary outcome of any stroke or death during the peri-procedural period or ipsilateral stroke within 4 years was also analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For the primary outcome, there were no CAS vs CEA treatment differences within any age stratum (P > .05). For the secondary outcome of stroke or death, those randomized to CAS age 75 to 79 yearas were at approximately four times greater risk compared with those randomized to CEA (10% vs 2%; hazard ratio, 4.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-14.83). No treatment differences between CAS and CEA were detected for the three younger age strata, <65, 65 to 69, and 70 to 74 years (P > .05). For patients randomized to CAS, the risk of the primary endpoint for those aged 75 to 79 years was higher than the risk for those age <65 years (11% vs 4%; hazard ratio, 2.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-5.53), without significant differences between other strata (P > .05). For those randomized to CEA, there were no differences between age strata (P > .1).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This pooled analysis of 2544 asymptomatic patients in CREST and ACT 1 shows a higher stroke or death risk for CAS compared with CEA in only the oldest age group, 75 to 79 years. For patients randomized to CAS, there was an increased risk for patients aged 75 to 79 years. No increased risk by age was found for patients randomized to CEA. Hence, the clinical management of asymptomatic patients above age 75 years must be individualized to optimize outcomes in the context of advances in CAS since 2013.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2024.12.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We assessed if age was an effect modifier in a pooled analysis of two randomized trials comparing carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in asymptomatic patients, CREST and ACT 1.

Methods: We analyzed data from 2544 patients aged <80 yearas with ≥70% asymptomatic carotid stenosis randomized to CAS or CEA (nCREST = 1091; nACT 1 = 1453) who were recruited between 2000 and 2013. Age was considered in four strata (<65, 65-69, 70-74, and 75-79 years). The primary outcome was any stroke, myocardial infarction, or death during the peri-procedural period, or ipsilateral stroke afterwards. The secondary outcome of any stroke or death during the peri-procedural period or ipsilateral stroke within 4 years was also analyzed.

Results: For the primary outcome, there were no CAS vs CEA treatment differences within any age stratum (P > .05). For the secondary outcome of stroke or death, those randomized to CAS age 75 to 79 yearas were at approximately four times greater risk compared with those randomized to CEA (10% vs 2%; hazard ratio, 4.41; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-14.83). No treatment differences between CAS and CEA were detected for the three younger age strata, <65, 65 to 69, and 70 to 74 years (P > .05). For patients randomized to CAS, the risk of the primary endpoint for those aged 75 to 79 years was higher than the risk for those age <65 years (11% vs 4%; hazard ratio, 2.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-5.53), without significant differences between other strata (P > .05). For those randomized to CEA, there were no differences between age strata (P > .1).

Conclusions: This pooled analysis of 2544 asymptomatic patients in CREST and ACT 1 shows a higher stroke or death risk for CAS compared with CEA in only the oldest age group, 75 to 79 years. For patients randomized to CAS, there was an increased risk for patients aged 75 to 79 years. No increased risk by age was found for patients randomized to CEA. Hence, the clinical management of asymptomatic patients above age 75 years must be individualized to optimize outcomes in the context of advances in CAS since 2013.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无症状颈动脉狭窄在CREST和ACT 1支架置入与动脉内膜切除术试验中的年龄影响。
目的:我们对两项比较无症状患者CAS和CEA、CREST和ACT i的随机试验进行合并分析,评估年龄是否为影响因素。方法:我们分析2544例患者的数据,年龄CREST=1091;nACT-1=1453),他们在2000年至2013年间被招募。年龄分为四个层次(结果:对于主要结局,在任何年龄层中,cas与cea治疗均无差异(p < 0.05)。对于卒中或死亡的次要结局,年龄在75-79岁之间随机分配到CAS组的患者的风险大约是随机分配到CEA组的4倍(10% vs 2%, HR = 4.41;95% ci: 1.31-14.83)。CAS和CEA在三个较年轻年龄组的治疗差异无统计学意义(0.05)。对于随机分配到CAS的患者,75-79岁的主要终点风险高于0.05岁的风险。对于随机分配到CEA的患者,年龄层之间没有差异((p > 0.1))。结论:这项对2544名CREST和ACT-1无症状患者的汇总分析显示,仅在年龄最大的75-79岁年龄组中,CAS的卒中或死亡风险高于CEA。对于随机分配到CAS的患者,75-79岁的患者风险增加。随机分配到CEA的患者没有发现随年龄增加的风险。因此,自2013年以来,在CAS取得进展的背景下,75岁以上无症状患者的临床管理必须个体化,以优化结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
期刊最新文献
The great gender dilemma in complex aortic repair: Why do women fare worse with FEVAR? Controversies in the management strategy for symptomatic chronic internal carotid artery occlusion. Endovascular strategies for the short distance between the lowest renal artery and aortic bifurcation. How do we afford the BEST care for females with chronic limb-threatening ischemia? How should failed infrarenal endovascular aortic repair with a short renal artery to bifurcation distance be managed?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1