A comparison of arteriovenous grafts and fistulas in lower extremity hemodialysis procedures

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Journal of Vascular Surgery Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-03-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2025.03.003
Jewon Jeong MD, Sun Young Choi MD, PhD, Yong Jae Kim MD, PhD, Eun Ji Lee MD, PhD
{"title":"A comparison of arteriovenous grafts and fistulas in lower extremity hemodialysis procedures","authors":"Jewon Jeong MD,&nbsp;Sun Young Choi MD, PhD,&nbsp;Yong Jae Kim MD, PhD,&nbsp;Eun Ji Lee MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2025.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>Although upper arm hemodialysis access is preferred due to better patency and lower complication rates, femoral access remains necessary for certain patients. This study evaluates the patency rates of femoral hemodialysis access, specifically comparing femoral vein transposition arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and arteriovenous graft (AVG), and identifying factors affecting patency.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective review of patients who received femoral access at our institution from 2006 to 2022. Patency rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Risk factors influencing patency were examined through Cox regression modeling, and a comparative analysis between AVF and AVG was performed.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Ninety-one patients received femoral hemodialysis access (mean age, 63 ± 11 years; 57 males). Forty-one had AVF, and 50 had AVG. The overall 12-month and 24-month primary patency rates were 48% and 27%, assisted primary patency rates were 87% and 78%, and secondary patency rates were 90% and 89%. Subgroup analysis showed that femoral AVFs had 50% and 29% primary, 93% and 85% assisted primary, and 97% and 94% secondary patency at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Femoral AVGs demonstrated 44% and 22% primary, 82% and 73% assisted primary, and 84% and 82% secondary patency at 12 and 24 months. There was no significant difference in primary patency between femoral AVFs and AVGs (<em>P</em> = .858). However, the femoral AVF group had higher assisted primary patency (<em>P</em> &lt; .001) and secondary patency (<em>P</em> = .001). Previous femoral vein catheterization on the contralateral side and infection adversely affected secondary patency (hazard ratio, 2.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-6.07; <em>P</em> = .002).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Lower extremity hemodialysis access yields excellent secondary patency and patient survival rates, with AVF showing superior assisted primary patency and secondary patency compared with AVG. Femoral vascular access is a viable alternative when upper extremity options are exhausted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":"82 1","pages":"Pages 240-247"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0741521425003623","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Although upper arm hemodialysis access is preferred due to better patency and lower complication rates, femoral access remains necessary for certain patients. This study evaluates the patency rates of femoral hemodialysis access, specifically comparing femoral vein transposition arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and arteriovenous graft (AVG), and identifying factors affecting patency.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective review of patients who received femoral access at our institution from 2006 to 2022. Patency rates were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Risk factors influencing patency were examined through Cox regression modeling, and a comparative analysis between AVF and AVG was performed.

Results

Ninety-one patients received femoral hemodialysis access (mean age, 63 ± 11 years; 57 males). Forty-one had AVF, and 50 had AVG. The overall 12-month and 24-month primary patency rates were 48% and 27%, assisted primary patency rates were 87% and 78%, and secondary patency rates were 90% and 89%. Subgroup analysis showed that femoral AVFs had 50% and 29% primary, 93% and 85% assisted primary, and 97% and 94% secondary patency at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Femoral AVGs demonstrated 44% and 22% primary, 82% and 73% assisted primary, and 84% and 82% secondary patency at 12 and 24 months. There was no significant difference in primary patency between femoral AVFs and AVGs (P = .858). However, the femoral AVF group had higher assisted primary patency (P < .001) and secondary patency (P = .001). Previous femoral vein catheterization on the contralateral side and infection adversely affected secondary patency (hazard ratio, 2.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.43-6.07; P = .002).

Conclusions

Lower extremity hemodialysis access yields excellent secondary patency and patient survival rates, with AVF showing superior assisted primary patency and secondary patency compared with AVG. Femoral vascular access is a viable alternative when upper extremity options are exhausted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢血液透析手术中动静脉移植物与瘘管的比较。
目的:虽然上臂血液透析通路因其良好的通畅性和较低的并发症发生率而被首选,但对于某些患者来说,股骨通路仍然是必要的。本研究评估股血液透析通路的通畅率,特别比较股静脉转置动静脉瘘(AVF)和动静脉移植物(AVG),并找出影响通畅的因素。方法:我们对2006年至2022年在我院接受股骨通路的患者进行回顾性分析。采用Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估通畅率。通过Cox回归模型检验影响通畅的危险因素,并对AVF和AVG进行比较分析。结果:91例患者接受了股骨血液透析通路(平均年龄63±11岁,男性57例)。AVF 41例,AVG 50例。总12个月和24个月原发性通畅率分别为48%和27%,辅助原发性通畅率分别为87%和78%,继发通畅率分别为90%和89%。亚组分析显示,12个月和24个月时,股动脉avf原发通畅率分别为50%和29%,辅助原发通畅率分别为93%和85%,继发通畅率分别为97%和94%。在12个月和24个月时,股骨AVGs显示44%和22%的原发通畅,82%和73%的辅助原发通畅,84%和82%的继发通畅。股骨avf与avg的原发性通畅无显著性差异(P = 0.858)。然而,股动脉AVF组有较高的辅助原发性通畅(P < 0.001)和继发性通畅(P = 0.001)。先前对侧股静脉置管和感染对继发性通畅有不利影响(风险比2.95;95%置信区间为1.43 ~ 6.07;P = .002)。结论:下肢血液透析通路具有良好的继发性通畅和患者生存率,与AVG相比,AVF具有更好的辅助原发性通畅和继发性通畅。当上肢选择不足时,股血管通路是一种可行的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
期刊最新文献
The society for vascular surgery clinical practice guideline on the management of blunt thoracic aortic injury: A focused update. Expansion and rupture due to endoleaks following endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm A case of Behçet disease complicated with multiple false aneurysms of the aorta The effect of aneurysm diameter on perioperative outcomes following endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair Early outcomes for women and men after open extent III thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1