Identification of Factors Affecting the Accrual of Black Males Into Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials in the United States.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Practice Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000726
Keith Crawford, Jake Vinson, Thomas Farrington
{"title":"Identification of Factors Affecting the Accrual of Black Males Into Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials in the United States.","authors":"Keith Crawford, Jake Vinson, Thomas Farrington","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Black males have the highest incidence and mortality rates from prostate cancer of any racial group in the United States, yet are underrepresented in prostate cancer clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Prostate Health Education Network surveyed its members about experiences regarding prostate cancer clinical trials and explored reasons for lack of participation. Black males residing in the United States with a diagnosis of prostate cancer were eligible to participate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 480 members contacted, 115 (24.0%) completed the survey. Respondents were diverse in age, geography, education, and socioeconomic status, and 58 (50.4%) had a family history of prostate cancer; 12 of 115 (10.4%) had participated in a prostate cancer clinical trial. The most common reasons for nonparticipation (N = 89) included not being asked (55.1%) and a lack of information about risks and benefits (13.5%). No respondents cited lack of trust in the healthcare system based on personal experience, although 2 (2.2%) cited the Tuskegee study. Factors that would influence future decisions around trial participation included whether respondents (N = 99) perceived the treatment or diagnostic option to be effective for themselves (54.5%), to have the potential to advance medical science (45.5%), and to have minimal side effects (44.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This survey of Prostate Health Education Network members found that the principal reason for Black males not participating in prostate cancer clinical trials was that they were not being asked. This highlights an unmet need for stronger collaboration between patients, health professionals, the pharmaceutical industry, and clinical trial investigators to address barriers to Black males enrolling in prostate cancer clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":"12 1","pages":"51-61"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Black males have the highest incidence and mortality rates from prostate cancer of any racial group in the United States, yet are underrepresented in prostate cancer clinical trials.

Methods: The Prostate Health Education Network surveyed its members about experiences regarding prostate cancer clinical trials and explored reasons for lack of participation. Black males residing in the United States with a diagnosis of prostate cancer were eligible to participate.

Results: Of 480 members contacted, 115 (24.0%) completed the survey. Respondents were diverse in age, geography, education, and socioeconomic status, and 58 (50.4%) had a family history of prostate cancer; 12 of 115 (10.4%) had participated in a prostate cancer clinical trial. The most common reasons for nonparticipation (N = 89) included not being asked (55.1%) and a lack of information about risks and benefits (13.5%). No respondents cited lack of trust in the healthcare system based on personal experience, although 2 (2.2%) cited the Tuskegee study. Factors that would influence future decisions around trial participation included whether respondents (N = 99) perceived the treatment or diagnostic option to be effective for themselves (54.5%), to have the potential to advance medical science (45.5%), and to have minimal side effects (44.4%).

Conclusions: This survey of Prostate Health Education Network members found that the principal reason for Black males not participating in prostate cancer clinical trials was that they were not being asked. This highlights an unmet need for stronger collaboration between patients, health professionals, the pharmaceutical industry, and clinical trial investigators to address barriers to Black males enrolling in prostate cancer clinical trials.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定影响美国黑人男性进入前列腺癌临床试验的因素。
在美国,黑人男性的前列腺癌发病率和死亡率是所有种族中最高的,但在前列腺癌临床试验中的代表性不足。方法:前列腺健康教育网对其成员进行前列腺癌临床试验经验调查,探讨参与不足的原因。居住在美国的诊断为前列腺癌的黑人男性有资格参加。结果:在联系的480名会员中,有115名(24.0%)完成了调查。调查对象年龄、地域、教育程度和社会经济地位各不相同,58人(50.4%)有前列腺癌家族史;115人中有12人(10.4%)参加过前列腺癌临床试验。不参与的最常见原因(N = 89)包括没有被询问(55.1%)和缺乏风险和收益信息(13.5%)。尽管有2人(2.2%)引用了塔斯基吉的研究,但没有受访者基于个人经验提到对医疗保健系统缺乏信任。影响未来参与试验决策的因素包括受访者(N = 99)是否认为治疗或诊断方案对自己有效(54.5%),是否有可能推进医学科学(45.5%),以及是否副作用最小(44.4%)。结论:对前列腺健康教育网成员的调查发现,黑人男性不参加前列腺癌临床试验的主要原因是他们没有被要求。这凸显了患者、卫生专业人员、制药行业和临床试验研究人员之间加强合作的需求尚未得到满足,以解决黑人男性参加前列腺癌临床试验的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Practice
Urology Practice UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
163
期刊最新文献
Disproportionality Analysis of Hypotension-Related Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Type 1a Selective Alpha Blockers in VigiBase. Renal Function After Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Warm, Cold, and No Ischemia Methods. Risks and Benefits of Caprini Score Recommended Thromboprophylaxis After Radical Prostatectomy and Nephrectomy. Trends in Outpatient Radical Prostatectomy and Same-Day Discharge for Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample. Evidence-Based Framework for Surgical Irrigation Fluid Stewardship and Endoscopic Case Prioritization During Fluid Shortages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1