Renal Function After Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Warm, Cold, and No Ischemia Methods.

IF 0.8 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Urology Practice Pub Date : 2025-02-04 DOI:10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000779
Sandeep Gurram, Jillian Egan, Maria Antony, Michael A Ahdoot, Nitin K Yerram, Amir Lebastchi, Heather J Chalfin, Patrick Gomella, Gennady Bratslavsky, Adam R Metwalli, W Marston Linehan, Mark W Ball
{"title":"Renal Function After Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Warm, Cold, and No Ischemia Methods.","authors":"Sandeep Gurram, Jillian Egan, Maria Antony, Michael A Ahdoot, Nitin K Yerram, Amir Lebastchi, Heather J Chalfin, Patrick Gomella, Gennady Bratslavsky, Adam R Metwalli, W Marston Linehan, Mark W Ball","doi":"10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Results from prior studies show contradictory evidence in determining whether utilization of renal ischemia during partial nephrectomies (PN) results in worse renal functional outcomes. Data assessing a large cohort of patients with no ischemia PN are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the use and type of renal ischemia during PN affects renal functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of 742 patients undergoing PN were assessed and split into 4 cohorts: no ischemia (n = 455), cold ischemia (n = 63), warm ischemia time (WIT) < 30 minutes (n = 164), and WIT ≥ 30 minutes (n = 60). Twelve-month relative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) changes and split function were assessed among the cohorts. Univariate and multivariable regression analysis were used to determine predictors of postoperative acute kidney injury and long-term renal functional outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No difference in the mean relative decrease in GFR was noted among the 4 cohorts at either the 3-month (8.7% ± 25.5, <i>P</i> = .1) or 12-month (7.5% ± 19.0, <i>P</i> = .2) period. On multivariable analysis, age (coef: 0.3, <i>P</i> < .001), estimated blood loss (coef: 0.2 per 100 mL, <i>P</i> = .02), baseline GFR (coef: 2 per 10 units, <i>P</i> < .001), number of tumors resected (coef: 0.4, <i>P</i> = .02), and postoperative acute kidney injury (coef: 8.3, <i>P</i> < .001) were predictive of a higher percentage decrease in 12-month GFR while male sex (coef: -6.3, <i>P</i> = .001) was inversely related. The type of ischemia or length of WIT was not associated with 12-month GFR change.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients undergoing PN, the use of and type of ischemia affects short-term but not long-term renal functional outcomes. Facility with multiple ischemia techniques may be useful in the management of patients requiring complex PN.</p>","PeriodicalId":45220,"journal":{"name":"Urology Practice","volume":" ","pages":"101097UPJ0000000000000779"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Results from prior studies show contradictory evidence in determining whether utilization of renal ischemia during partial nephrectomies (PN) results in worse renal functional outcomes. Data assessing a large cohort of patients with no ischemia PN are lacking. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the use and type of renal ischemia during PN affects renal functional outcomes.

Methods: A retrospective review of 742 patients undergoing PN were assessed and split into 4 cohorts: no ischemia (n = 455), cold ischemia (n = 63), warm ischemia time (WIT) < 30 minutes (n = 164), and WIT ≥ 30 minutes (n = 60). Twelve-month relative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) changes and split function were assessed among the cohorts. Univariate and multivariable regression analysis were used to determine predictors of postoperative acute kidney injury and long-term renal functional outcomes.

Results: No difference in the mean relative decrease in GFR was noted among the 4 cohorts at either the 3-month (8.7% ± 25.5, P = .1) or 12-month (7.5% ± 19.0, P = .2) period. On multivariable analysis, age (coef: 0.3, P < .001), estimated blood loss (coef: 0.2 per 100 mL, P = .02), baseline GFR (coef: 2 per 10 units, P < .001), number of tumors resected (coef: 0.4, P = .02), and postoperative acute kidney injury (coef: 8.3, P < .001) were predictive of a higher percentage decrease in 12-month GFR while male sex (coef: -6.3, P = .001) was inversely related. The type of ischemia or length of WIT was not associated with 12-month GFR change.

Conclusions: In patients undergoing PN, the use of and type of ischemia affects short-term but not long-term renal functional outcomes. Facility with multiple ischemia techniques may be useful in the management of patients requiring complex PN.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾部分切除术后的肾功能:温水、冷水和无缺血方法的比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Urology Practice
Urology Practice UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
163
期刊最新文献
Disproportionality Analysis of Hypotension-Related Adverse Drug Reactions Associated with Type 1a Selective Alpha Blockers in VigiBase. Renal Function After Partial Nephrectomy: A Comparative Analysis of Warm, Cold, and No Ischemia Methods. Risks and Benefits of Caprini Score Recommended Thromboprophylaxis After Radical Prostatectomy and Nephrectomy. Trends in Outpatient Radical Prostatectomy and Same-Day Discharge for Prostate Cancer: Analysis of the National Inpatient Sample and Nationwide Ambulatory Surgery Sample. Evidence-Based Framework for Surgical Irrigation Fluid Stewardship and Endoscopic Case Prioritization During Fluid Shortages.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1