Facial Affect Recognition and Executive Function Abnormalities in ADHD Subjects: An ERP Study.

Saghar Vosough, Gian Candrian, Johannes Kasper, Hossam Abdel Rehim, Dominique Eich, Andreas Müller, Lutz Jäncke
{"title":"Facial Affect Recognition and Executive Function Abnormalities in ADHD Subjects: An ERP Study.","authors":"Saghar Vosough, Gian Candrian, Johannes Kasper, Hossam Abdel Rehim, Dominique Eich, Andreas Müller, Lutz Jäncke","doi":"10.1177/15500594241304492","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects approximately 12% of children worldwide. With a 50% chance of persistence into adulthood and associations with impairments in various domains, including social and emotional ones, early diagnosis is crucial. The exact neural substrates of ADHD are still unclear. This study aimed to reassess the behavioral and neural metrics of executive functions and neural substrates of facial affect recognition. A total of 117 ADHD patients and 183 healthy controls were evaluated by two Go/NoGo tasks: the classic visual continuous performance test and the emotional continuous performance test, which requires facial affect encoding. Group differences between ADHD subjects and healthy controls were assessed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with age and sex included as covariates. Dependent variables comprised behavioral (number of omission and commission errors, reaction time, and reaction time variability) and neurophysiological measures (event-related potentials [ERPs]). As the main result, we identified significant differences between ADHD patients and healthy controls in all behavioral metrics, one neural marker of action inhibition (P3d) and the facial processing marker (N170). The differences were moderate-to-large when expressed as effect size measures in behavioral variables and small-to-moderate for neurophysiological variables. The small-to-moderate effect sizes obtained from the neurophysiological measures suggest that ERPs are insufficient as sole markers for effectively screening emotion and face processing abnormalities in ADHD.</p>","PeriodicalId":93940,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"15500594241304492"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594241304492","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) affects approximately 12% of children worldwide. With a 50% chance of persistence into adulthood and associations with impairments in various domains, including social and emotional ones, early diagnosis is crucial. The exact neural substrates of ADHD are still unclear. This study aimed to reassess the behavioral and neural metrics of executive functions and neural substrates of facial affect recognition. A total of 117 ADHD patients and 183 healthy controls were evaluated by two Go/NoGo tasks: the classic visual continuous performance test and the emotional continuous performance test, which requires facial affect encoding. Group differences between ADHD subjects and healthy controls were assessed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with age and sex included as covariates. Dependent variables comprised behavioral (number of omission and commission errors, reaction time, and reaction time variability) and neurophysiological measures (event-related potentials [ERPs]). As the main result, we identified significant differences between ADHD patients and healthy controls in all behavioral metrics, one neural marker of action inhibition (P3d) and the facial processing marker (N170). The differences were moderate-to-large when expressed as effect size measures in behavioral variables and small-to-moderate for neurophysiological variables. The small-to-moderate effect sizes obtained from the neurophysiological measures suggest that ERPs are insufficient as sole markers for effectively screening emotion and face processing abnormalities in ADHD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ADHD受试者的面部情绪识别和执行功能异常:一项ERP研究。
注意缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)影响全世界约12%的儿童。这种疾病有50%的几率会持续到成年,并与包括社交和情感在内的各个领域的损伤有关,因此早期诊断至关重要。ADHD的确切神经基础仍不清楚。本研究旨在重新评估执行功能的行为和神经指标以及面部情感识别的神经基础。117例ADHD患者和183名健康对照采用经典视觉连续表现测试和需要面部情感编码的情绪连续表现测试两项Go/NoGo任务进行评估。使用协方差分析(ANCOVA)评估ADHD受试者与健康对照组之间的组差异,协变量包括年龄和性别。因变量包括行为(疏漏和操作错误数量、反应时间和反应时间变异性)和神经生理测量(事件相关电位[erp])。作为主要结果,我们发现ADHD患者与健康对照者在所有行为指标、一个动作抑制神经标记(P3d)和面部处理标记(N170)上存在显著差异。当用行为变量的效应量来表达时,差异是中等到大的,而神经生理变量的效应量则是小到中等的。从神经生理学测量中获得的小到中等效应大小表明,erp不足以作为有效筛查ADHD患者情绪和面部加工异常的唯一标记。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
STIT-Net- A Wavelet based Convolutional Transformer Model for Motor Imagery EEG Signal Classification in the Sensorimotor Bands. qEEG Neuromarkers of Complex Childhood Trauma in Adolescents. The P200 ERP Response in Mild Cognitive Impairment and the Aging Population. Monitoring the Response of Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder with EEG: Could it be an Indicator of Returning to Health in Responders. The Role of Electroencephalography Following CAR-T Cell Therapy in Clinical Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1