The Role of Electroencephalography Following CAR-T Cell Therapy in Clinical Practice.

Alexander J Matthews, Fiona E Starkie, Lydia E Staniaszek, Nicholas M Kane
{"title":"The Role of Electroencephalography Following CAR-T Cell Therapy in Clinical Practice.","authors":"Alexander J Matthews, Fiona E Starkie, Lydia E Staniaszek, Nicholas M Kane","doi":"10.1177/15500594241312451","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b>Neurotoxicity, encephalopathy, and seizures can occur following chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy. Our aim was to assess what value electroencephalography (EEG) offers for people undergoing CAR-T treatment in clinical practice, including possible diagnostic, management, and prognostic roles. <b>Methods:</b> All patients developing CAR-T related neurotoxicity referred for EEG were eligible for inclusion. Reasons for EEG referral and qualitative EEG findings were analysed and reported. The relationship between objective quantitative EEG (QEEG) encephalopathy grade and clinical neurotoxicity (immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; ICANS) grade was determined. The prognostic ability of QEEG grade was assessed for survival and functional status. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-eight patients with 53 EEG recordings were included. Common reasons given on EEG referrals were possible seizure diagnosis (n = 38), reduced consciousness (n = 8), and superimposed cerebral infection (n = 4). Four focal seizures were detected on three (3/53; 5.7%) EEGs. There was a moderately positive correlation between QEEG grade and ICANS grade (r = + 0.41, p = .030). QEEG grade could not predict survival at 3 months (Area Under Curve; AUC = 0.673) or 6 months (AUC = 0.578), nor could it predict functional status at 1 month (r = + 0.40; p = .080), 3 months (r = + 0.19; p = .439), or time to return to baseline (r = + 0.32; p = .156). <b>Conclusions:</b> EEG was useful in seizure diagnosis. QEEG has a possible role as a specific biomarker of encephalopathy/neurotoxicity. EEG generated no tangible changes in patient management. QEEG was unable to prognosticate survival or functional status.</p>","PeriodicalId":93940,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"15500594241312451"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594241312451","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives:Neurotoxicity, encephalopathy, and seizures can occur following chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy. Our aim was to assess what value electroencephalography (EEG) offers for people undergoing CAR-T treatment in clinical practice, including possible diagnostic, management, and prognostic roles. Methods: All patients developing CAR-T related neurotoxicity referred for EEG were eligible for inclusion. Reasons for EEG referral and qualitative EEG findings were analysed and reported. The relationship between objective quantitative EEG (QEEG) encephalopathy grade and clinical neurotoxicity (immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome; ICANS) grade was determined. The prognostic ability of QEEG grade was assessed for survival and functional status. Results: Twenty-eight patients with 53 EEG recordings were included. Common reasons given on EEG referrals were possible seizure diagnosis (n = 38), reduced consciousness (n = 8), and superimposed cerebral infection (n = 4). Four focal seizures were detected on three (3/53; 5.7%) EEGs. There was a moderately positive correlation between QEEG grade and ICANS grade (r = + 0.41, p = .030). QEEG grade could not predict survival at 3 months (Area Under Curve; AUC = 0.673) or 6 months (AUC = 0.578), nor could it predict functional status at 1 month (r = + 0.40; p = .080), 3 months (r = + 0.19; p = .439), or time to return to baseline (r = + 0.32; p = .156). Conclusions: EEG was useful in seizure diagnosis. QEEG has a possible role as a specific biomarker of encephalopathy/neurotoxicity. EEG generated no tangible changes in patient management. QEEG was unable to prognosticate survival or functional status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
CAR-T细胞治疗后脑电图在临床实践中的作用。
目的:嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T细胞治疗后可发生神经毒性、脑病和癫痫发作。我们的目的是评估脑电图(EEG)在临床实践中为接受CAR-T治疗的患者提供的价值,包括可能的诊断、管理和预后作用。方法:所有接受脑电图检查的CAR-T相关神经毒性患者均符合入选条件。分析并报告脑电图转诊原因及定性脑电图结果。客观定量脑电图(QEEG)脑病分级与临床神经毒性(免疫效应细胞相关神经毒性综合征)的关系确定ICANS分级。评估QEEG分级对生存和功能状态的预后能力。结果:共纳入28例患者53份脑电图记录。脑电图转诊的常见原因是可能的癫痫诊断(n = 38)、意识下降(n = 8)和叠加性脑感染(n = 4)。3例(3/53;5.7%)脑电图。QEEG分级与ICANS分级存在中度正相关(r = + 0.41, p = 0.030)。QEEG分级不能预测3个月生存率(曲线下面积;AUC = 0.673)或6个月时(AUC = 0.578),也不能预测1个月时的功能状态(r = + 0.40;P = 0.080), 3个月(r = + 0.19;P = .439),或恢复到基线的时间(r = + 0.32;p = .156)。结论:脑电图对癫痫的诊断有一定的价值。QEEG可能作为脑病/神经毒性的特定生物标志物。脑电图对患者管理没有明显的改变。QEEG不能预测患者的生存或功能状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
STIT-Net- A Wavelet based Convolutional Transformer Model for Motor Imagery EEG Signal Classification in the Sensorimotor Bands. qEEG Neuromarkers of Complex Childhood Trauma in Adolescents. The P200 ERP Response in Mild Cognitive Impairment and the Aging Population. Monitoring the Response of Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder with EEG: Could it be an Indicator of Returning to Health in Responders. The Role of Electroencephalography Following CAR-T Cell Therapy in Clinical Practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1