A learning analytics dashboard to support students' reflection on collaboration

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Pub Date : 2024-11-07 DOI:10.1111/jcal.13088
Vanessa Echeverria, Gloria Fernandez Nieto, Linxuan Zhao, Evelyn Palominos, Namrata Srivastava, Dragan Gašević, Viktoria Pammer-Schindler, Roberto Martinez-Maldonado
{"title":"A learning analytics dashboard to support students' reflection on collaboration","authors":"Vanessa Echeverria,&nbsp;Gloria Fernandez Nieto,&nbsp;Linxuan Zhao,&nbsp;Evelyn Palominos,&nbsp;Namrata Srivastava,&nbsp;Dragan Gašević,&nbsp;Viktoria Pammer-Schindler,&nbsp;Roberto Martinez-Maldonado","doi":"10.1111/jcal.13088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Dashboards play a prominent role in learning analytics (LA) research. In collaboration activities, dashboards can show traces of team participation. They are often evaluated based on students' perceived satisfaction and engagement with the dashboard. However, there is a notable methodological gap in understanding how these dashboards support the nuanced process of student reflection.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This paper presents empirical evidence on how students from high and low-performing groups reflect individually on their performance while using a Learning Analytics Dashboard (LAD).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We address this in the context of education in healthcare, wherein we captured actions and positioning data from a simulation-based collaborative activity and generated a collaborative LAD. A total of 41 nursing students were invited to participate in a post-hoc semi-structured individual interview to use a collaborative LAD while answering a set of prompts to reflect on their individual and group performance. Students' reflections were coded and analysed using Bain's 5R reflection framework. We used epistemic network analysis to capture the dynamic reflection process and to understand the connections between the reflection stages (from low to high). We compared how different these connections were for students in high and low-performing groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Our results revealed that most students were only able to achieve low and middle stages of reflection. Yet, students in low-performing groups predominantly followed low-to-middle stages of reflection. In contrast, students from high-performing groups demonstrated the ability to transition between low-to-middle and low-to-high stages of reflection. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for both research and practice, particularly emphasising the necessity to scaffold reflection when using LADs.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.13088","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Dashboards play a prominent role in learning analytics (LA) research. In collaboration activities, dashboards can show traces of team participation. They are often evaluated based on students' perceived satisfaction and engagement with the dashboard. However, there is a notable methodological gap in understanding how these dashboards support the nuanced process of student reflection.

Objective

This paper presents empirical evidence on how students from high and low-performing groups reflect individually on their performance while using a Learning Analytics Dashboard (LAD).

Methods

We address this in the context of education in healthcare, wherein we captured actions and positioning data from a simulation-based collaborative activity and generated a collaborative LAD. A total of 41 nursing students were invited to participate in a post-hoc semi-structured individual interview to use a collaborative LAD while answering a set of prompts to reflect on their individual and group performance. Students' reflections were coded and analysed using Bain's 5R reflection framework. We used epistemic network analysis to capture the dynamic reflection process and to understand the connections between the reflection stages (from low to high). We compared how different these connections were for students in high and low-performing groups.

Results and Conclusions

Our results revealed that most students were only able to achieve low and middle stages of reflection. Yet, students in low-performing groups predominantly followed low-to-middle stages of reflection. In contrast, students from high-performing groups demonstrated the ability to transition between low-to-middle and low-to-high stages of reflection. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for both research and practice, particularly emphasising the necessity to scaffold reflection when using LADs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个学习分析仪表板,支持学生对协作的反思
仪表板在学习分析(LA)研究中扮演着重要的角色。在协作活动中,仪表板可以显示团队参与的痕迹。它们通常是根据学生对仪表板的感知满意度和参与度来评估的。然而,在理解这些仪表板如何支持学生反思的微妙过程方面,存在着显著的方法差距。本文提供了经验证据,说明在使用学习分析仪表板(LAD)时,来自高表现和低表现群体的学生如何单独反映他们的表现。我们在医疗保健教育的背景下解决了这个问题,其中我们从基于模拟的协作活动中捕获了行动和定位数据,并生成了协作性LAD。共有41名护理专业学生被邀请参加一个临时半结构化的个人访谈,使用协作式LAD,同时回答一组提示,以反映他们的个人和团体表现。使用贝恩的5R反思框架对学生的反思进行编码和分析。我们使用认知网络分析来捕捉动态反思过程,并了解反思阶段之间的联系(从低到高)。我们比较了高表现组和低表现组学生之间这些联系的差异。结果与结论我们的研究结果显示,大多数学生只能达到中低阶段的反思。然而,表现不佳的学生主要是在中低阶段进行反思。相比之下,来自高绩效组的学生表现出在低到中、低到高反思阶段之间转换的能力。基于这些发现,我们讨论了对研究和实践的影响,特别强调了在使用lad时支架反射的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
期刊最新文献
Unravelling the Computational Thinking and Spatial Thinking Development: An Exploration of a Virtual Robot Programming Environment The Online Presence During Synchronous Classes of Secondary Students in Chile: The Need to Incorporate Socio-Emotional Knowledge and Teaching Strategies Effects of Digital Game-Based Learning on Student's Problem-Solving Ability: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis Fostering EFL Learners' Speaking Skills and Flow Experience With Video-Dubbing Tasks: A Flow Theory Perspective Knowledge (Co-)Construction Among Artificial Intelligence, Novice Teachers, and Experienced Teachers in an Online Professional Learning Community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1