Quantitative assessment of CO2 leakage risk in geologic carbon storage management

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-11-12 DOI:10.1002/ghg.2315
Meng Jing, Qi Li, Guizhen Liu, Quan Xue
{"title":"Quantitative assessment of CO2 leakage risk in geologic carbon storage management","authors":"Meng Jing,&nbsp;Qi Li,&nbsp;Guizhen Liu,&nbsp;Quan Xue","doi":"10.1002/ghg.2315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Large-scale geological storage of carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) is indispensable for mitigating climate change but faces significant challenges, especially in the accurate quantitative assessment of leakage risks to ensure long-term security. Given these circumstances, this paper proposes an innovative approach for quantitatively assessing CO<sub>2</sub> leakage risk to address the previous limitations of limited accuracy and insufficient data. We construct a fault tree and transform it into a Bayesian network–directed acyclic graph, and then use judgment sets along with fuzzy set theory to obtain prior probabilities of root nodes. The feature, event, and process method was utilized to identify key components and subsequently determine the conditional probability table (CPT) of the leaf node. The subjective experience assessments from experts are defuzzified to obtain the CPTs of intermediate nodes. The obtained basic probability parameters are input into the directed acyclic graph to complete the model construction. After calculating the leakage probability using this model, it is combined with the severity of impacts to conduct a comprehensive risk assessment. Furthermore, critical CO<sub>2</sub> risk sources can be determined through posterior probability calculations when intermediate nodes are designated as deterministic risk events. The gradual implementation process of the proposed model is demonstrated via a typical case study. The results indicate an overall CO<sub>2</sub> leakage probability of 29%, with probabilities of leakage along faults/fractures, caprock, and well identified as 32%, 28%, and 19%, respectively. The project is categorized as a medium-low risk level. When leakage is confirmed, tectonic movement, thickness, and delamination at interface connections/the presence of cracks are the critical risk sources, and measures to mitigate key risks are outlined. The identified key risk factors conform to empirical evidence and previous research, validating the accuracy of the model. This study is instrumental in CO<sub>2</sub> geological storage risk assessment and scalable development program design. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":12796,"journal":{"name":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","volume":"14 6","pages":"1068-1091"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ghg.2315","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large-scale geological storage of carbon dioxide (CO2) is indispensable for mitigating climate change but faces significant challenges, especially in the accurate quantitative assessment of leakage risks to ensure long-term security. Given these circumstances, this paper proposes an innovative approach for quantitatively assessing CO2 leakage risk to address the previous limitations of limited accuracy and insufficient data. We construct a fault tree and transform it into a Bayesian network–directed acyclic graph, and then use judgment sets along with fuzzy set theory to obtain prior probabilities of root nodes. The feature, event, and process method was utilized to identify key components and subsequently determine the conditional probability table (CPT) of the leaf node. The subjective experience assessments from experts are defuzzified to obtain the CPTs of intermediate nodes. The obtained basic probability parameters are input into the directed acyclic graph to complete the model construction. After calculating the leakage probability using this model, it is combined with the severity of impacts to conduct a comprehensive risk assessment. Furthermore, critical CO2 risk sources can be determined through posterior probability calculations when intermediate nodes are designated as deterministic risk events. The gradual implementation process of the proposed model is demonstrated via a typical case study. The results indicate an overall CO2 leakage probability of 29%, with probabilities of leakage along faults/fractures, caprock, and well identified as 32%, 28%, and 19%, respectively. The project is categorized as a medium-low risk level. When leakage is confirmed, tectonic movement, thickness, and delamination at interface connections/the presence of cracks are the critical risk sources, and measures to mitigate key risks are outlined. The identified key risk factors conform to empirical evidence and previous research, validating the accuracy of the model. This study is instrumental in CO2 geological storage risk assessment and scalable development program design. © 2024 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地质储碳管理中CO2泄漏风险定量评价
大规模的二氧化碳地质封存对于减缓气候变化是必不可少的,但也面临着重大挑战,特别是在准确定量评估泄漏风险以确保长期安全方面。鉴于这些情况,本文提出了一种创新的CO2泄漏风险定量评估方法,以解决以往准确性有限和数据不足的局限性。构造故障树并将其转化为贝叶斯网络有向无环图,然后利用判断集和模糊集理论求出根节点的先验概率。利用特征、事件和过程方法识别关键组件,然后确定叶节点的条件概率表(CPT)。对专家的主观经验评价进行去模糊化,得到中间节点的cpt。将得到的基本概率参数输入到有向无环图中,完成模型的构造。利用该模型计算泄漏概率后,结合影响的严重程度进行综合风险评估。此外,将中间节点指定为确定性风险事件时,可以通过后验概率计算确定临界CO2风险源。通过一个典型的案例研究,说明了该模型的逐步实施过程。结果表明,总体CO2泄漏概率为29%,其中沿断层/裂缝、盖层和井识别的泄漏概率分别为32%、28%和19%。该项目被划分为中低风险级别。当确认泄漏时,构造运动、厚度和界面连接处的分层/裂缝的存在是关键的风险来源,并概述了减轻关键风险的措施。确定的关键风险因素符合经验证据和先前的研究,验证了模型的准确性。该研究对二氧化碳地质封存风险评估和可扩展开发方案设计具有重要意义。©2024化学工业协会和John Wiley &;儿子,有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology
Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology ENERGY & FUELS-ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
55
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is a new online-only scientific journal dedicated to the management of greenhouse gases. The journal will focus on methods for carbon capture and storage (CCS), as well as utilization of carbon dioxide (CO2) as a feedstock for fuels and chemicals. GHG will also provide insight into strategies to mitigate emissions of other greenhouse gases. Significant advances will be explored in critical reviews, commentary articles and short communications of broad interest. In addition, the journal will offer analyses of relevant economic and political issues, industry developments and case studies. Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology is an exciting new online-only journal published as a co-operative venture of the SCI (Society of Chemical Industry) and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Impact of Diverse Parameters on CO2 Adsorption in CO2 Sequestration: Utilizing a Novel Triaxial Testing Apparatus Research and Prospect of CCUS-EOR Technology and Carbon Emission Reduction Accounting Evaluation Nickel Aluminum Spinel Derived Ni-F-Al Active Site for the Catalytic Dehydrofluorination of Potent Greenhouse Gas 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane Response Surface Optimisation of Carbon Dioxide Adsorption Onto Palm Shell Activated Carbon Functionalised With Natural Amino Acids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1