Uncovering adults' problem-solving patterns from process data with hidden Markov model and network analysis

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Computer Assisted Learning Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.1111/jcal.13089
Xiaoxiao Liu, Okan Bulut, Ying Cui, Yizhu Gao
{"title":"Uncovering adults' problem-solving patterns from process data with hidden Markov model and network analysis","authors":"Xiaoxiao Liu,&nbsp;Okan Bulut,&nbsp;Ying Cui,&nbsp;Yizhu Gao","doi":"10.1111/jcal.13089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Process data captured by computer-based assessments provide valuable insight into respondents' cognitive processes during problem-solving tasks. Although previous studies have utilized process data to analyse behavioural patterns or strategies in problem-solving tasks, the connection between latent cognitive states and their theoretical interpretation in problem solving remains unclear.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This research aims to investigate the connections between similar hidden response states and unfold respondents' transition paths in problem-solving processes. Analysing process data from the 2012 United States Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), this study seeks to discern patterns in problem solving among participants.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The hidden Markov model was first used to uncover the hidden states based on a sequence of observed actions. Next, Gaussian graphical network analysis was employed to analyse the relationships between hidden response states.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results and Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Results indicated that correct responders had simpler, clearer state relationships, while incorrect responders displayed more complex connections. Respondents who solved the tasks correctly had clearer thoughts about the problem-solving process, whereas incorrect respondents struggled to understand the problem and failed to figure out solutions. Cognitive state changes during problem solving also varied between groups. The correct groups showed cohesive, logical transitions, in contrast to the emerged isolated, erratic patterns of the incorrect groups.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcal.13089","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.13089","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Process data captured by computer-based assessments provide valuable insight into respondents' cognitive processes during problem-solving tasks. Although previous studies have utilized process data to analyse behavioural patterns or strategies in problem-solving tasks, the connection between latent cognitive states and their theoretical interpretation in problem solving remains unclear.

Objectives

This research aims to investigate the connections between similar hidden response states and unfold respondents' transition paths in problem-solving processes. Analysing process data from the 2012 United States Programme for the International Assessment of Adult Competencies (PIAAC), this study seeks to discern patterns in problem solving among participants.

Methods

The hidden Markov model was first used to uncover the hidden states based on a sequence of observed actions. Next, Gaussian graphical network analysis was employed to analyse the relationships between hidden response states.

Results and Conclusions

Results indicated that correct responders had simpler, clearer state relationships, while incorrect responders displayed more complex connections. Respondents who solved the tasks correctly had clearer thoughts about the problem-solving process, whereas incorrect respondents struggled to understand the problem and failed to figure out solutions. Cognitive state changes during problem solving also varied between groups. The correct groups showed cohesive, logical transitions, in contrast to the emerged isolated, erratic patterns of the incorrect groups.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用隐马尔可夫模型和网络分析从过程数据中发现成人解决问题的模式
基于计算机的评估获取的过程数据为调查对象在解决问题任务期间的认知过程提供了有价值的见解。虽然以前的研究利用过程数据来分析问题解决任务中的行为模式或策略,但潜在认知状态与其在问题解决中的理论解释之间的联系尚不清楚。目的探讨相似隐藏反应状态之间的联系,揭示被调查者在问题解决过程中的转换路径。本研究分析了2012年美国成人国际能力评估项目(PIAAC)的过程数据,旨在辨别参与者解决问题的模式。方法首先利用隐马尔可夫模型,根据观察到的动作序列揭示隐藏状态。其次,采用高斯图网络分析方法分析了隐藏响应状态之间的关系。结果与结论结果表明,正确应答者的状态关系较为简单、清晰,错误应答者的状态关系较为复杂。正确解决任务的受访者对解决问题的过程有更清晰的想法,而不正确的受访者则难以理解问题,无法找到解决方案。在解决问题的过程中,认知状态的变化在不同的组之间也有所不同。正确的组呈现出连贯的、逻辑的过渡,而不正确的组则呈现出孤立的、不稳定的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
期刊最新文献
Unravelling the Computational Thinking and Spatial Thinking Development: An Exploration of a Virtual Robot Programming Environment The Online Presence During Synchronous Classes of Secondary Students in Chile: The Need to Incorporate Socio-Emotional Knowledge and Teaching Strategies Effects of Digital Game-Based Learning on Student's Problem-Solving Ability: A Three-Level Meta-Analysis Fostering EFL Learners' Speaking Skills and Flow Experience With Video-Dubbing Tasks: A Flow Theory Perspective Knowledge (Co-)Construction Among Artificial Intelligence, Novice Teachers, and Experienced Teachers in an Online Professional Learning Community
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1