A single-center learning curve for stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy and a surgical framework to manage failures.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Epilepsia Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1111/epi.18188
Ashley L B Raghu, Jonathan Lau, Matthew A Stern, Razan R Faraj, Faical Isbaine, Dayton Grogan, Katie Bullinger, Rebecca W Roth, Adam S Dickey, Jon T Willie, Daniel L Drane, Robert E Gross
{"title":"A single-center learning curve for stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy and a surgical framework to manage failures.","authors":"Ashley L B Raghu, Jonathan Lau, Matthew A Stern, Razan R Faraj, Faical Isbaine, Dayton Grogan, Katie Bullinger, Rebecca W Roth, Adam S Dickey, Jon T Willie, Daniel L Drane, Robert E Gross","doi":"10.1111/epi.18188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy (SLAH) is a minimally invasive procedure for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy that preserves more tissue than open procedures. As a result, although patients have better functional outcomes, more patients do not achieve seizure freedom. The rate at which this occurs is evolving with improved surgical practices. However, the risks and benefits of further surgical management for these patients remains a question with limited data to guide decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively reviewed a continuous series (2011-2019) of SLAH operations at our institution to determine trends in surgical management, identifying cases where further surgery was performed. Pre-operative and follow-up seizure, cognitive, and functional data, and surgical complications were collated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 108 patients undergoing primary SLAH, 21 (19%) underwent further surgery (23 procedures). Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) informed seven procedures (30%). There was a trend for quicker SLAH failure in the earlier patients. Similarly, surgical chronology was associated with progression to repeat surgery (p = .007). At 1-year follow-up, 6 of 13 patients (46%) achieved seizure freedom after repeat SLAH and 5 of 8 patients (63%) achieved seizure freedom after anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), one of whom had failed two SLAHs. Two of three patients undergoing an ablation outside the mesial temporal lobe achieved seizure freedom at 1 year. Neuropsychological sequelae were more prevalent with ATL than SLAH, including decline in visual naming (p = .01) and functional status (p = .007).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Repeat SLAH and ATL post-SLAH are both practicable and can be effective. Surgical experience, risk to cognition, and marginal benefit relative to existing improvement are principal considerations for further surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18188","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Stereotactic laser amygdalohippocampotomy (SLAH) is a minimally invasive procedure for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy that preserves more tissue than open procedures. As a result, although patients have better functional outcomes, more patients do not achieve seizure freedom. The rate at which this occurs is evolving with improved surgical practices. However, the risks and benefits of further surgical management for these patients remains a question with limited data to guide decision-making.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed a continuous series (2011-2019) of SLAH operations at our institution to determine trends in surgical management, identifying cases where further surgery was performed. Pre-operative and follow-up seizure, cognitive, and functional data, and surgical complications were collated.

Results: Of 108 patients undergoing primary SLAH, 21 (19%) underwent further surgery (23 procedures). Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) informed seven procedures (30%). There was a trend for quicker SLAH failure in the earlier patients. Similarly, surgical chronology was associated with progression to repeat surgery (p = .007). At 1-year follow-up, 6 of 13 patients (46%) achieved seizure freedom after repeat SLAH and 5 of 8 patients (63%) achieved seizure freedom after anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL), one of whom had failed two SLAHs. Two of three patients undergoing an ablation outside the mesial temporal lobe achieved seizure freedom at 1 year. Neuropsychological sequelae were more prevalent with ATL than SLAH, including decline in visual naming (p = .01) and functional status (p = .007).

Significance: Repeat SLAH and ATL post-SLAH are both practicable and can be effective. Surgical experience, risk to cognition, and marginal benefit relative to existing improvement are principal considerations for further surgery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立体定向激光杏仁枕切断术的单中心学习曲线和处理失败的手术框架。
目的:立体定向激光扁桃体海马切开术(SLAH)是一种微创治疗内侧颞叶癫痫的手术,比开放手术保留更多的组织。因此,尽管患者有更好的功能结果,但更多的患者不能实现癫痫发作自由。这种情况发生的速度随着外科手术的改进而不断发展。然而,这些患者进一步手术治疗的风险和益处仍然是一个问题,指导决策的数据有限。方法:回顾性分析我院2011-2019年连续进行的SLAH手术,以确定手术管理的趋势,确定进一步手术的病例。对术前和随访的癫痫发作、认知和功能数据以及手术并发症进行整理。结果:在108例原发性SLAH患者中,21例(19%)接受了进一步的手术(23次手术)。立体脑电图(SEEG)为7例手术提供了信息(30%)。早期患者有更快的SLAH衰竭的趋势。同样,手术年表与再次手术的进展相关(p = .007)。在1年的随访中,13例患者中有6例(46%)在重复SLAH后癫痫发作自由,8例患者中有5例(63%)在前颞叶切除术(ATL)后癫痫发作自由,其中1例两次SLAH失败。三名接受内侧颞叶外消融术的患者中有两名在一年内实现了癫痫发作的自由。与SLAH相比,ATL的神经心理后遗症更为普遍,包括视觉识别能力下降(p = 0.01)和功能状态下降(p = 0.007)。意义:重复slh和slh后ATL都是可行且有效的。手术经验、认知风险和相对于现有改善的边际效益是进一步手术的主要考虑因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
期刊最新文献
Vagus nerve stimulation in Lennox-Gastaut syndrome: Twenty-four-month data and experience from the CORE-VNS study. Neural mass modeling reveals that hyperexcitability underpins slow-wave sleep changes in children with epilepsy. The role of electroencephalography in epilepsy research-From seizures to interictal activity and comorbidities. Risk of epilepsy following first unprovoked and acute seizures: Cohort study. Evolution in the prescription and cost of non-intravenous rescue benzodiazepines for the treatment of seizure emergencies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1