A Bedside-to-Bench-to-Bedside Journey to Advance Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation towards Biologic Joint Restoration.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Knee Surgery Pub Date : 2025-01-20 DOI:10.1055/a-2506-2675
James L Cook, James P Stannard, Aaron M Stoker, Kylee Rucinski, Brett D Crist, Cristi R Cook, Cory Crecelius, Chantelle C Bozynski, Keiichi Kuroki, Lisa A Royse, Renee Stucky, Clark T Hung, Matthew J Smith, Kyle M Schweser, Clayton W Nuelle, Steven DeFroda
{"title":"A Bedside-to-Bench-to-Bedside Journey to Advance Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation towards Biologic Joint Restoration.","authors":"James L Cook, James P Stannard, Aaron M Stoker, Kylee Rucinski, Brett D Crist, Cristi R Cook, Cory Crecelius, Chantelle C Bozynski, Keiichi Kuroki, Lisa A Royse, Renee Stucky, Clark T Hung, Matthew J Smith, Kyle M Schweser, Clayton W Nuelle, Steven DeFroda","doi":"10.1055/a-2506-2675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>More than 70 million adults in the United States are impacted by osteoarthritis (OA). Symptomatic articular cartilage loss that progresses to debilitating OA is being diagnosed more frequently and earlier in life, such that a growing number of active patients are faced with life-altering health care decisions at increasingly younger ages. Joint replacement surgeries, in the form of various artificial arthroplasties, are reliable operations, especially for older (≥65 years), more sedentary patients with end-stage OA, but have major limitations for younger, more active patients. For younger adults and those who wish to remain highly active, artificial arthroplasties are associated with significantly higher levels of pain, complications, morbidity, dysfunction, and likelihood of revision. Unfortunately, non-surgical management strategies and surgical treatment options other than joint replacement are often not indicated and have not proven to be consistently successful for this large and growing population of patients. As such, these patients are often relegated to postpone surgery, take medications including opioids, profoundly alter their lifestyle, and live with pain and disability until artificial arthroplasty is more likely to meet their functional demands without high risk for early revision. As such, our research team set out to develop, test, and validate biologic joint restoration strategies that could provide consistently successful options for young and active patients with joint disorders who were not considered ideal candidates for artificial arthroplasty. In pursuit of this goal, we implemented a targeted bedside-to-bench-to-bedside translational approach to hypothesis-driven studies designed to address this major unmet need in orthopaedics by identifying and overcoming key clinical limitations and obstacles faced by health care teams and patients in realizing optimal outcomes after biologic joint restoration. The objective of this article is to condense more than two decades of rigorous patient-centered research aimed at optimizing osteochondral and meniscus allograft transplantation toward more consistently successful management of complex joint problems in young and active patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2506-2675","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

More than 70 million adults in the United States are impacted by osteoarthritis (OA). Symptomatic articular cartilage loss that progresses to debilitating OA is being diagnosed more frequently and earlier in life, such that a growing number of active patients are faced with life-altering health care decisions at increasingly younger ages. Joint replacement surgeries, in the form of various artificial arthroplasties, are reliable operations, especially for older (≥65 years), more sedentary patients with end-stage OA, but have major limitations for younger, more active patients. For younger adults and those who wish to remain highly active, artificial arthroplasties are associated with significantly higher levels of pain, complications, morbidity, dysfunction, and likelihood of revision. Unfortunately, non-surgical management strategies and surgical treatment options other than joint replacement are often not indicated and have not proven to be consistently successful for this large and growing population of patients. As such, these patients are often relegated to postpone surgery, take medications including opioids, profoundly alter their lifestyle, and live with pain and disability until artificial arthroplasty is more likely to meet their functional demands without high risk for early revision. As such, our research team set out to develop, test, and validate biologic joint restoration strategies that could provide consistently successful options for young and active patients with joint disorders who were not considered ideal candidates for artificial arthroplasty. In pursuit of this goal, we implemented a targeted bedside-to-bench-to-bedside translational approach to hypothesis-driven studies designed to address this major unmet need in orthopaedics by identifying and overcoming key clinical limitations and obstacles faced by health care teams and patients in realizing optimal outcomes after biologic joint restoration. The objective of this article is to condense more than two decades of rigorous patient-centered research aimed at optimizing osteochondral and meniscus allograft transplantation toward more consistently successful management of complex joint problems in young and active patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
推进同种异体骨软骨移植生物关节修复的从床到台到床的旅程。
美国有超过7000万成年人患有骨关节炎(OA)。症状性关节软骨丧失发展为衰弱性OA的诊断越来越频繁和早期,因此越来越多的活跃患者在越来越年轻的年龄面临着改变生活的医疗保健决定。关节置换手术,以各种人工关节置换术的形式,是可靠的手术,特别是对于老年(65岁左右),久坐的终末期OA患者,但对于年轻,更活跃的患者有很大的局限性。对于年轻人和那些希望保持高度活跃的人来说,人工关节置换术与更高水平的疼痛、并发症、发病率、功能障碍和翻修的可能性相关。不幸的是,除了关节置换术之外,非手术治疗策略和手术治疗选择通常没有被指出,也没有被证明对这一庞大且不断增长的患者群体是一贯成功的。因此,这些患者往往不得不推迟手术,服用包括阿片类药物在内的药物,深刻地改变他们的生活方式,忍受疼痛和残疾,直到人工关节置换术更有可能满足他们的功能需求,而不会有早期翻修的高风险。因此,我们的研究团队着手开发、测试和验证生物关节修复策略,这些策略可以为年轻和活跃的关节疾病患者提供持续成功的选择,这些患者被认为不是人工关节置换术的理想人选。为了实现这一目标,我们实施了一种有针对性的从床到台到床的转化方法,用于假设驱动的研究,旨在通过识别和克服医疗团队和患者在实现生物关节修复后最佳结果时面临的关键临床限制和障碍,解决骨科中这一主要未满足的需求。本文的目的是总结20多年来严格的以患者为中心的研究,旨在优化骨软骨和半月板同种异体移植,以更一致地成功管理年轻和活跃患者的复杂关节问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
期刊最新文献
Intra-Articular Adductor Canal Block Has Equivalent Analgesic Effect to Traditional Ultrasound-Guided Adductor Canal Block after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. A Bedside-to-Bench-to-Bedside Journey to Advance Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation towards Biologic Joint Restoration. Analgesic Effect of Intermittent Multiple IPACK Block Combined with ACB in Patients with Flexion Contracture Knee Arthritis Undergoing Total Knee Arthroplasty. The Fate of the DAIR, Outcomes after 1 Year: A Large Database Study. The 10-Year Outcomes of Single- versus Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1