The optimal surgical time after stent placement in obstructive colorectal cancer: impact on long-term survival of patients.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Techniques in Coloproctology Pub Date : 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1007/s10151-024-03051-w
L Ji, S Li, J Zhou, C Xin, P Liu, Z Lou, W Zhang
{"title":"The optimal surgical time after stent placement in obstructive colorectal cancer: impact on long-term survival of patients.","authors":"L Ji, S Li, J Zhou, C Xin, P Liu, Z Lou, W Zhang","doi":"10.1007/s10151-024-03051-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the optimal interval between self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) placement and radical surgery in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>In this study, a retrospective research design was used to select 125 patients with obstructive colorectal cancer who underwent colonoscopic SEMS placement with subsequent radical surgery between February 2011 and November 2022 at Shanghai Changhai Hospital. In addition, their clinical data and therapeutic efficacy were examined. Grouping: grouping on the basis of the interval of bridge to surgery (BTS). Group A: interval of BTS ≤ 14 days; group B: 14 days < interval of BTS ≤ 21 days; group C1: interval of BTS > 21 days; group C2: interval of BTS > 21 days, excluding patients who received neoadjuvant therapy; group D: patients who received neoadjuvant therapy. Patients were grouped according to their different surgical methods, group E: patients who received open surgery and group F: patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 125 patients were included in this study, the mean age of the patients was 61.34 ± 13.99 years, with the median follow-up time was 39 (25-61) months. Of these, 84 cases (67.2%) underwent open surgery, while 41 cases (32.8%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. Among the cohort, 15 patients received neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy after placement of SEMS. There was a significant difference in preoperative hemoglobin levels between group A and both group B and group C1. The laparoscopic surgery rate was significantly higher in group B than in the other two groups (48.57% versus 3.33% and 22.81%, P = 0.038). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of group C1 patients was lower than that in group A and group B (32.4% versus 56.3%, 62.3%, P = 0.038; P = 0.043), whereas there was no statistical difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS) (60.7% versus 62.1%, 69.6%, P = 0.365, P = 0.339). group D showed a higher proportion of open surgery and a higher T-stage (P < 0.05), resulting in a 5-year DFS that was inferior to group A and group B (17.7% versus 56.3%, 62.3%, P = 0.045; P = 0.047). However, there was no significant difference compared with group C2 (17.7% versus 36.9%, P > 0.05). The 5-year OS of group D was not statistically significantly different from that of group A, group B, and group C2 (28.4% versus 62.1%, 69.6%, 73.4%, P = 0.089, P = 0.090, P = 0.183). In addition, no statistically significant differences were identified in 5-year DFS (49.9% versus 37.0%, P = 0.555) or 5-year OS (66.2% versus 62.6%, P = 0.062) between group E and group F CONCLUSIONS: Radical surgery performed 14-21 days apart after SEMS placement has been shown to improve minimally invasive rates and 5-year DFS rates. The addition of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy during the interval does not appear to improve long-term survival, although this conclusion is based on the results of only 15 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":51192,"journal":{"name":"Techniques in Coloproctology","volume":"29 1","pages":"30"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Techniques in Coloproctology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-024-03051-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the optimal interval between self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) placement and radical surgery in patients with obstructive colorectal cancer.

Method: In this study, a retrospective research design was used to select 125 patients with obstructive colorectal cancer who underwent colonoscopic SEMS placement with subsequent radical surgery between February 2011 and November 2022 at Shanghai Changhai Hospital. In addition, their clinical data and therapeutic efficacy were examined. Grouping: grouping on the basis of the interval of bridge to surgery (BTS). Group A: interval of BTS ≤ 14 days; group B: 14 days < interval of BTS ≤ 21 days; group C1: interval of BTS > 21 days; group C2: interval of BTS > 21 days, excluding patients who received neoadjuvant therapy; group D: patients who received neoadjuvant therapy. Patients were grouped according to their different surgical methods, group E: patients who received open surgery and group F: patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

Results: A total of 125 patients were included in this study, the mean age of the patients was 61.34 ± 13.99 years, with the median follow-up time was 39 (25-61) months. Of these, 84 cases (67.2%) underwent open surgery, while 41 cases (32.8%) underwent laparoscopic surgery. Among the cohort, 15 patients received neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy after placement of SEMS. There was a significant difference in preoperative hemoglobin levels between group A and both group B and group C1. The laparoscopic surgery rate was significantly higher in group B than in the other two groups (48.57% versus 3.33% and 22.81%, P = 0.038). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of group C1 patients was lower than that in group A and group B (32.4% versus 56.3%, 62.3%, P = 0.038; P = 0.043), whereas there was no statistical difference in the 5-year overall survival (OS) (60.7% versus 62.1%, 69.6%, P = 0.365, P = 0.339). group D showed a higher proportion of open surgery and a higher T-stage (P < 0.05), resulting in a 5-year DFS that was inferior to group A and group B (17.7% versus 56.3%, 62.3%, P = 0.045; P = 0.047). However, there was no significant difference compared with group C2 (17.7% versus 36.9%, P > 0.05). The 5-year OS of group D was not statistically significantly different from that of group A, group B, and group C2 (28.4% versus 62.1%, 69.6%, 73.4%, P = 0.089, P = 0.090, P = 0.183). In addition, no statistically significant differences were identified in 5-year DFS (49.9% versus 37.0%, P = 0.555) or 5-year OS (66.2% versus 62.6%, P = 0.062) between group E and group F CONCLUSIONS: Radical surgery performed 14-21 days apart after SEMS placement has been shown to improve minimally invasive rates and 5-year DFS rates. The addition of neoadjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy during the interval does not appear to improve long-term survival, although this conclusion is based on the results of only 15 patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
梗阻性结直肠癌支架置入后的最佳手术时间:对患者长期生存的影响。
目的:探讨梗阻性结直肠癌患者自扩式金属支架置入术与根治性手术的最佳间隔。方法:本研究采用回顾性研究设计,选取2011年2月至2022年11月在上海长海医院行结肠镜下置入SEMS并行根治性手术的125例梗阻性结直肠癌患者。观察两组患者的临床资料及治疗效果。分组:根据手术桥距(BTS)进行分组。A组:BTS间隔≤14天;B组:14天21天;C2组:BTS间隔21天,不包括接受新辅助治疗的患者;D组:接受新辅助治疗的患者。患者按手术方式不同进行分组,E组为开腹手术患者,F组为腹腔镜手术患者。结果:本研究共纳入125例患者,患者平均年龄61.34±13.99岁,中位随访时间39(25-61)个月。其中开放手术84例(67.2%),腹腔镜手术41例(32.8%)。在队列中,15例患者在放置SEMS后接受了新辅助放疗和化疗。术前血红蛋白水平a组与B组、C1组比较差异均有统计学意义。B组腹腔镜手术率明显高于其他两组(48.57%比3.33%和22.81%,P = 0.038)。C1组患者的5年无病生存率(DFS)低于A组和B组(32.4%比56.3%,62.3%,P = 0.038;P = 0.043),而5年总生存率(OS)差异无统计学意义(60.7% vs 62.1%, 69.6%, P = 0.365, P = 0.339)。D组开腹手术比例较高,t期较高(P < 0.05)。D组5年OS与A、B、C2组比较差异无统计学意义(28.4%比62.1%、69.6%、73.4%,P = 0.089、P = 0.090、P = 0.183)。此外,E组和F组5年DFS(49.9%比37.0%,P = 0.555)和5年OS(66.2%比62.6%,P = 0.062)差异无统计学意义。结论:SEMS放置后间隔14-21天进行根治性手术可提高微创率和5年DFS率。虽然这一结论仅基于15例患者的结果,但在间隔期间增加新辅助放疗和化疗似乎并没有改善长期生存。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Techniques in Coloproctology
Techniques in Coloproctology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
176
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Techniques in Coloproctology is an international journal fully devoted to diagnostic and operative procedures carried out in the management of colorectal diseases. Imaging, clinical physiology, laparoscopy, open abdominal surgery and proctoperineology are the main topics covered by the journal. Reviews, original articles, technical notes and short communications with many detailed illustrations render this publication indispensable for coloproctologists and related specialists. Both surgeons and gastroenterologists are represented on the distinguished Editorial Board, together with pathologists, radiologists and basic scientists from all over the world. The journal is strongly recommended to those who wish to be updated on recent developments in the field, and improve the standards of their work. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1965 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted. Reports of animal experiments must state that the Principles of Laboratory Animal Care (NIH publication no. 86-23 revised 1985) were followed as were applicable national laws (e.g. the current version of the German Law on the Protection of Animals). The Editor-in-Chief reserves the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. Authors will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill such requirements.
期刊最新文献
Comparing answers of ChatGPT and Google Gemini to common questions on benign anal conditions. Robotic-assisted total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis: a step-by-step approach for surgeons advancing to expertise. Lateral pelvic lymph node dissection (LPLND) in the treatment of rectal cancer: current practice and evolving approaches in India. Margin matters: analyzing the impact of circumferential margin involvement on survival and recurrence after incomplete total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Positive lateral lymph node turned negative after neoadjuvant therapy-surgery or observation?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1