Chronic pelvic insufficiency fractures and their treatment

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1007/s00402-024-05717-4
Jan Gewiess, Christoph Emanuel Albers, Marius Johann Baptist Keel, Frede Frihagen, Pol Maria Rommens, Johannes Dominik Bastian
{"title":"Chronic pelvic insufficiency fractures and their treatment","authors":"Jan Gewiess,&nbsp;Christoph Emanuel Albers,&nbsp;Marius Johann Baptist Keel,&nbsp;Frede Frihagen,&nbsp;Pol Maria Rommens,&nbsp;Johannes Dominik Bastian","doi":"10.1007/s00402-024-05717-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Fragility and insufficiency fractures of the pelvis (FFP) and sacrum (SIF) are increasingly prevalent, particularly among the elderly, due to weakened bone structure and low-energy trauma. Chronic instability from these fractures causes persistent pain, limited mobility, and significant reductions in quality of life. Hospitalization is often required, with substantial risks of loss of independence (64–89%) and high mortality rates (13–27%). While conservative treatment is possible, surgical intervention is preferred for unstable or progressive fractures. FFP and SIF are primarily associated with osteoporosis, with 71% of patients not receiving adequate secondary fracture prevention. Imaging modalities play a crucial role in diagnosis. Conventional radiography often misses sacral fractures, while computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for evaluating fracture morphology. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers the highest sensitivity (99%), essential for detecting complex fractures and assessing bone edema. Advanced techniques like dual-energy CT and SPECT/CT provide further diagnostic value. Rommens and Hofmann’s classification system categorizes FFP based on anterior and posterior pelvic ring involvement, guiding treatment strategies. Progression from stable fractures (FFP I–II) to highly unstable patterns (FFP IV) is common and influenced by factors like pelvic morphology, bone density, and sarcopenia. Treatment varies based on fracture type and stability. Non-displaced posterior fractures can be managed with sacroplasty or screw fixation, while displaced or unstable patterns often require more invasive methods, such as triangular lumbopelvic fixation or transsacral bar osteosynthesis. Sacroplasty provides significant pain relief but has limited stabilizing capacity, while screw augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate improves fixation in osteoporotic bones. Anterior ring fractures may be treated with retrograde transpubic screws or symphyseal plating, with biomechanical stability and long-term outcomes depending on fixation techniques. FFP and SIF management requires a multidisciplinary approach to ensure stability, pain relief, and functional recovery, emphasizing early diagnosis, tailored surgical strategies, and secondary prevention of osteoporotic\nfractures.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00402-024-05717-4.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-024-05717-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fragility and insufficiency fractures of the pelvis (FFP) and sacrum (SIF) are increasingly prevalent, particularly among the elderly, due to weakened bone structure and low-energy trauma. Chronic instability from these fractures causes persistent pain, limited mobility, and significant reductions in quality of life. Hospitalization is often required, with substantial risks of loss of independence (64–89%) and high mortality rates (13–27%). While conservative treatment is possible, surgical intervention is preferred for unstable or progressive fractures. FFP and SIF are primarily associated with osteoporosis, with 71% of patients not receiving adequate secondary fracture prevention. Imaging modalities play a crucial role in diagnosis. Conventional radiography often misses sacral fractures, while computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for evaluating fracture morphology. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers the highest sensitivity (99%), essential for detecting complex fractures and assessing bone edema. Advanced techniques like dual-energy CT and SPECT/CT provide further diagnostic value. Rommens and Hofmann’s classification system categorizes FFP based on anterior and posterior pelvic ring involvement, guiding treatment strategies. Progression from stable fractures (FFP I–II) to highly unstable patterns (FFP IV) is common and influenced by factors like pelvic morphology, bone density, and sarcopenia. Treatment varies based on fracture type and stability. Non-displaced posterior fractures can be managed with sacroplasty or screw fixation, while displaced or unstable patterns often require more invasive methods, such as triangular lumbopelvic fixation or transsacral bar osteosynthesis. Sacroplasty provides significant pain relief but has limited stabilizing capacity, while screw augmentation with polymethylmethacrylate improves fixation in osteoporotic bones. Anterior ring fractures may be treated with retrograde transpubic screws or symphyseal plating, with biomechanical stability and long-term outcomes depending on fixation techniques. FFP and SIF management requires a multidisciplinary approach to ensure stability, pain relief, and functional recovery, emphasizing early diagnosis, tailored surgical strategies, and secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性盆腔功能不全骨折及其治疗
骨盆(FFP)和骶骨(SIF)的脆弱性和不完全性骨折越来越普遍,特别是在老年人中,由于骨骼结构减弱和低能量创伤。这些骨折引起的慢性不稳定导致持续疼痛、活动受限和生活质量显著下降。通常需要住院治疗,有很大的丧失独立性的风险(64-89%)和高死亡率(13-27%)。虽然保守治疗是可能的,但对于不稳定或进展性骨折,手术干预是首选。FFP和SIF主要与骨质疏松症相关,71%的患者没有接受足够的二级骨折预防。成像方式在诊断中起着至关重要的作用。传统的x线摄影经常错过骶骨骨折,而计算机断层扫描(CT)是评估骨折形态的金标准。磁共振成像(MRI)提供最高的灵敏度(99%),对于检测复杂骨折和评估骨水肿至关重要。双能CT和SPECT/CT等先进技术提供了进一步的诊断价值。Rommens和Hofmann的分类系统根据骨盆前后环受累情况对FFP进行分类,指导治疗策略。从稳定骨折(FFP I-II)到高度不稳定骨折(FFP IV)的进展是常见的,并受骨盆形态、骨密度和肌肉减少症等因素的影响。治疗方法因骨折类型和稳定性而异。非移位的后路骨折可采用骶骨成形术或螺钉固定,而移位或不稳定的骨折通常需要更具侵入性的方法,如三角形腰骨盆固定或经骶骨棒骨固定术。骶骨成形术可显著缓解疼痛,但稳定能力有限,而聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯螺钉增强可改善骨质疏松骨的固定。前环骨折可采用逆行经耻骨螺钉或联合钢板治疗,其生物力学稳定性和长期疗效取决于固定技术。FFP和SIF的治疗需要多学科的方法来确保稳定性、疼痛缓解和功能恢复,强调早期诊断、量身定制的手术策略和骨质疏松性骨折的二级预防。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
期刊最新文献
Predictors of functional recovery following surgical repair of quadriceps tendon rupture: insights from a German multicentre study. What does the patients' perception of alignment tell us about alignment targets in total knee arthroplasty? Autologous minced cartilage implantation in osteochondral lesions of the talus-does fibrin make the difference? Outpatient total hip arthroplasty: robotic assistance reduces 90-Day postoperative events and optimizes outpatient care. Blood management protocol for baseline anemic patients undergoing hip arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1