Machine learning for the prediction of mortality in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES BMC Infectious Diseases Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1186/s12879-024-10380-6
Xiangui Lv, Daiqiang Liu, Xinwei Chen, Lvlin Chen, Xiaohui Wang, Xiaomei Xu, Lin Chen, Chao Huang
{"title":"Machine learning for the prediction of mortality in patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Xiangui Lv, Daiqiang Liu, Xinwei Chen, Lvlin Chen, Xiaohui Wang, Xiaomei Xu, Lin Chen, Chao Huang","doi":"10.1186/s12879-024-10380-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Predicting mortality in sepsis-related acute kidney injury facilitates early data-driven treatment decisions. Machine learning is predicting mortality in S-AKI in a growing number of studies. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the predictive value of machine learning for mortality in patients with septic acute kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were searched up to 20 July 2024 This was supplemented by a manual search of study references and review articles. Data were analysed using STATA 14.0 software. The risk of bias in the prediction model was assessed using the Predictive Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 8 studies were included, with a total of 53 predictive models and 17 machine learning algorithms used. Meta-analysis using a random effects model showed that the overall C index in the training set was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.84), sensitivity was 0.39 (0.32-0.47), and specificity was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.95). The overall C-index in the validation set was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71-0.74), sensitivity was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.48-0.60) and specificity was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.91). The results showed that the machine learning algorithms had a good performance in predicting sepsis-related acute kidney injury death prediction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Machine learning has been shown to be an effective tool for predicting sepsis-associated acute kidney injury deaths, which has important implications for enhancing risk assessment and clinical decision-making to improve sepsis patient care. It is also eagerly anticipated that future research efforts will incorporate larger sample sizes and multi-centre studies to more intensively examine the external validation of these models in different patient populations, allowing for a more in-depth exploration of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in terms of accurate diagnostic efficacy across a diverse range of model and predictor types.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024569420).</p>","PeriodicalId":8981,"journal":{"name":"BMC Infectious Diseases","volume":"24 1","pages":"1454"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663330/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Infectious Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-10380-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Predicting mortality in sepsis-related acute kidney injury facilitates early data-driven treatment decisions. Machine learning is predicting mortality in S-AKI in a growing number of studies. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the predictive value of machine learning for mortality in patients with septic acute kidney injury.

Methods: The PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were searched up to 20 July 2024 This was supplemented by a manual search of study references and review articles. Data were analysed using STATA 14.0 software. The risk of bias in the prediction model was assessed using the Predictive Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool.

Results: A total of 8 studies were included, with a total of 53 predictive models and 17 machine learning algorithms used. Meta-analysis using a random effects model showed that the overall C index in the training set was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.78-0.84), sensitivity was 0.39 (0.32-0.47), and specificity was 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.95). The overall C-index in the validation set was 0.73 (95% CI: 0.71-0.74), sensitivity was 0.54 (95% CI: 0.48-0.60) and specificity was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.91). The results showed that the machine learning algorithms had a good performance in predicting sepsis-related acute kidney injury death prediction.

Conclusion: Machine learning has been shown to be an effective tool for predicting sepsis-associated acute kidney injury deaths, which has important implications for enhancing risk assessment and clinical decision-making to improve sepsis patient care. It is also eagerly anticipated that future research efforts will incorporate larger sample sizes and multi-centre studies to more intensively examine the external validation of these models in different patient populations, allowing for a more in-depth exploration of sepsis-associated acute kidney injury in terms of accurate diagnostic efficacy across a diverse range of model and predictor types.

Trial registration: This study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024569420).

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器学习预测败血症相关急性肾损伤患者死亡率:系统回顾和荟萃分析
背景:预测败血症相关急性肾损伤的死亡率有助于早期数据驱动的治疗决策。在越来越多的研究中,机器学习正在预测S-AKI的死亡率。因此,我们进行了这项系统回顾和荟萃分析,以研究机器学习对脓毒性急性肾损伤患者死亡率的预测价值。方法:检索截至2024年7月20日的PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library和Embase数据库,并辅以人工检索研究参考文献和综述文章。数据分析采用STATA 14.0软件。使用预测模型偏倚风险评估工具评估预测模型的偏倚风险。结果:共纳入8项研究,共使用53个预测模型和17种机器学习算法。采用随机效应模型进行meta分析显示,训练集的总C指数为0.81 (95% CI: 0.78 ~ 0.84),敏感性为0.39(0.32 ~ 0.47),特异性为0.92 (95% CI: 0.89 ~ 0.95)。验证集的总c指数为0.73 (95% CI: 0.71-0.74),敏感性为0.54 (95% CI: 0.48-0.60),特异性为0.90 (95% CI: 0.88-0.91)。结果表明,机器学习算法在脓毒症相关急性肾损伤死亡预测中有较好的表现。结论:机器学习已被证明是预测脓毒症相关急性肾损伤死亡的有效工具,这对加强脓毒症患者的风险评估和临床决策具有重要意义。我们也热切期待未来的研究工作将纳入更大的样本量和多中心研究,以更深入地检查这些模型在不同患者群体中的外部验证,从而在不同范围的模型和预测器类型中更深入地探索败血症相关急性肾损伤的准确诊断效果。试验注册:本研究在PROSPERO注册(CRD42024569420)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Infectious Diseases
BMC Infectious Diseases 医学-传染病学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
860
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: BMC Infectious Diseases is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of infectious and sexually transmitted diseases in humans, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence, antibiotic susceptibility and associated risk factors for extended spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae among patients suspected with urinary tract infection at Nigist Eleni Mohammed Memorial Hospital, Ethiopia. The optimal target of vancomycin area under the curve in early or later phase on clinical outcomes and nephrotoxicity in patients with enterococcal infective endocarditis: how much is enough? Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of hospitalized children with enterovirus infection: a retrospective study from 2016 to 2025 at Beijing children's hospital. Trends in candidemia and antifungal resistance: a nine-year single-center study in Turkey. Genomic surveillance of H1N1, H3N2 and influenza B Victoria lineage viruses in Qingyang (2020-2023): phylogenetic and molecular characteristics analysis of HA/NA genes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1