Showcasing diversity, equity, and inclusion in neurological surgery: a comparative analysis of neurological surgery residency program websites in the United States.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2024-12-21 DOI:10.1007/s10143-024-03148-8
Alexis L Price, William D Chow, Megan M J Bauman, David J Daniels
{"title":"Showcasing diversity, equity, and inclusion in neurological surgery: a comparative analysis of neurological surgery residency program websites in the United States.","authors":"Alexis L Price, William D Chow, Megan M J Bauman, David J Daniels","doi":"10.1007/s10143-024-03148-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Residency websites can often be crucial for influencing neurosurgery applicants' first impressions of programs. This study explores the representation of diversity on neurological surgery residency program websites and evaluates the impact of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) statements. The websites of 117 neurological surgery residency programs were evaluated for the presence of 12 diversity and inclusion elements. Univariate analysis was conducted to determine significant differences in DEI scores between neurological surgery residency program websites. Program analysis revealed a mean diversity score of 7.9 out of a maximum score of 12, equating to the presence of 66% of possible DEI elements in our scoring system. Top-50 ranked programs (Doximity) exhibited a significantly higher mean diversity score (8.6 +/- 2.7) compared to those outside the top-50 (7.2 +/- 2.9) (p = 0.009). Accessibility of DEI content varied, with most program websites either having a direct link to a separate DEI webpage (41%) or lacking any DEI elements (42%). A secondary analysis found that the presence of a DEI statement on a program's webpage was not significantly associated with Doximity ranking, NIH funding, geographic region, or hospital funding. However, programs with a DEI statement were significantly more likely to have various additional DEI elements (p < 0.001). While many neurological surgery residencies include elements of DEI on their websites, this is not currently a consistent practice across all programs. We advocate that these initiatives should be prominently featured on program websites to aid applicants in making informed decisions about their training journey.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"906"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-024-03148-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Residency websites can often be crucial for influencing neurosurgery applicants' first impressions of programs. This study explores the representation of diversity on neurological surgery residency program websites and evaluates the impact of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) statements. The websites of 117 neurological surgery residency programs were evaluated for the presence of 12 diversity and inclusion elements. Univariate analysis was conducted to determine significant differences in DEI scores between neurological surgery residency program websites. Program analysis revealed a mean diversity score of 7.9 out of a maximum score of 12, equating to the presence of 66% of possible DEI elements in our scoring system. Top-50 ranked programs (Doximity) exhibited a significantly higher mean diversity score (8.6 +/- 2.7) compared to those outside the top-50 (7.2 +/- 2.9) (p = 0.009). Accessibility of DEI content varied, with most program websites either having a direct link to a separate DEI webpage (41%) or lacking any DEI elements (42%). A secondary analysis found that the presence of a DEI statement on a program's webpage was not significantly associated with Doximity ranking, NIH funding, geographic region, or hospital funding. However, programs with a DEI statement were significantly more likely to have various additional DEI elements (p < 0.001). While many neurological surgery residencies include elements of DEI on their websites, this is not currently a consistent practice across all programs. We advocate that these initiatives should be prominently featured on program websites to aid applicants in making informed decisions about their training journey.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy, safety and dose patterns of tranexamic acid in meningioma surgery: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Analysis of the risk factors for loss of cervical lordosis after surgical removal of cervical spinal cord tumor. Clazosentan's dual edge in managing vasospasm following aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: an updated systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression of clinical outcomes and safety profiles. Transcranial resection of falcine meningiomas by complete endoscopy with the assistance of intraoperative ultrasound. Efficacy and safety of Cerebrospinal drains in preventing and managing spinal cord ischemia and Injury: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1