Analysis of the risk factors for loss of cervical lordosis after surgical removal of cervical spinal cord tumor.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurosurgical Review Pub Date : 2025-01-04 DOI:10.1007/s10143-025-03187-9
Yuhang Diao, Xiaojun Hu, Mingyu Hao, Minghao Xie, Zhenghao Hao, Chenyang Li, Rui Tan, Hongtao Rong, Tao Zhu
{"title":"Analysis of the risk factors for loss of cervical lordosis after surgical removal of cervical spinal cord tumor.","authors":"Yuhang Diao, Xiaojun Hu, Mingyu Hao, Minghao Xie, Zhenghao Hao, Chenyang Li, Rui Tan, Hongtao Rong, Tao Zhu","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03187-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Loss of cervical lordosis (LOCL) is the most common postoperative cervical deformity. This study aimed to identify the predictors of LOCL by investigating the relationship between various factors and LOCL development after surgery for cervical spinal cord tumors. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 51 patients who underwent cervical spinal tumor resection at a single center. Data on the patients' cervical sagittal alignment parameters were collected both pre- and postoperatively to analyze the association between pre- and postoperative cervical sagittal alignment parameters, age, sex, pathological type of tumor, tumor location, tumor length, and likelihood of developing LOCL following cervical spinal cord surgery. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed significant differences Pre-T1s (p = 0.005) and Post-CL (p = 0.009) angles. Additionally, ROC curves indicated a significant relationship between Post-CL and LOCL (p = 0.008, AUC = 0.718), with a Post-CL threshold value of 9.5°, and a relationship between Pre-T1s and LOCL (p = 0.025, AUC = 0.687). Tumor location, clinical staging, age, sex, and length of the segments involved in the tumor were not significantly associated with LOCL. Patients with a post-CL of less than 9.5° or Pre-T1s of more than 24.5° had a noticeably higher risk of developing LOCL. Active intervention in conjunction with surgical follow-up may be required for patients experiencing significant discomfort and associated functional impairment.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03187-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Loss of cervical lordosis (LOCL) is the most common postoperative cervical deformity. This study aimed to identify the predictors of LOCL by investigating the relationship between various factors and LOCL development after surgery for cervical spinal cord tumors. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 51 patients who underwent cervical spinal tumor resection at a single center. Data on the patients' cervical sagittal alignment parameters were collected both pre- and postoperatively to analyze the association between pre- and postoperative cervical sagittal alignment parameters, age, sex, pathological type of tumor, tumor location, tumor length, and likelihood of developing LOCL following cervical spinal cord surgery. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed significant differences Pre-T1s (p = 0.005) and Post-CL (p = 0.009) angles. Additionally, ROC curves indicated a significant relationship between Post-CL and LOCL (p = 0.008, AUC = 0.718), with a Post-CL threshold value of 9.5°, and a relationship between Pre-T1s and LOCL (p = 0.025, AUC = 0.687). Tumor location, clinical staging, age, sex, and length of the segments involved in the tumor were not significantly associated with LOCL. Patients with a post-CL of less than 9.5° or Pre-T1s of more than 24.5° had a noticeably higher risk of developing LOCL. Active intervention in conjunction with surgical follow-up may be required for patients experiencing significant discomfort and associated functional impairment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈脊髓肿瘤切除术后颈椎前凸消失的危险因素分析。
颈椎前凸缺失(LOCL)是最常见的颈椎术后畸形。本研究旨在通过探讨各种因素与颈脊髓肿瘤术后LOCL发生的关系,确定LOCL的预测因素。对51例在同一中心行颈椎肿瘤切除术的患者进行回顾性分析。收集患者术前和术后颈椎矢状位参数的数据,分析术前和术后颈椎矢状位参数与年龄、性别、肿瘤病理类型、肿瘤位置、肿瘤长度以及颈脊髓手术后发生LOCL的可能性之间的关系。多元logistic回归分析显示,t1s前角(p = 0.005)和cl后角(p = 0.009)存在显著差异。此外,ROC曲线显示,术后cl与LOCL之间存在显著相关性(p = 0.008, AUC = 0.718),术后cl阈值为9.5°,术前t1s与LOCL之间存在相关性(p = 0.025, AUC = 0.687)。肿瘤的位置、临床分期、年龄、性别和肿瘤累及的节段长度与LOCL无显著相关。术后cl小于9.5°或术前cl大于24.5°的患者发生LOCL的风险明显较高。对于出现明显不适和相关功能损害的患者,可能需要积极干预并配合手术随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
期刊最新文献
Potential role of standardized orbital ultrasound in the management of spontaneous CSF leaks. The impact of CHEK2 status on radiosurgical outcomes in breast cancer brain metastases. Exoscope versus microscope in spine surgery: A meta-analysis based on procedure-specific subgroup analysis. The effect of a learning curve on outcomes of vestibular schwannoma surgery: A systematic review. Macronutrients and micronutrients in relation to glioma: a bidirectional two-sample mendelian randomization analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1