Multimodal Rehabilitation Including Strengthening Exercise Is Effective in Improving Fear-Avoidance Beliefs in Individuals With Patellofemoral Pain: A Critically Appraised Topic.

Abstract

Clinical scenario: Individuals with patellofemoral pain (PFP) present with a variety of neuromuscular and psychological deficits, with the "gold-standard" for treatment being rehabilitation programs with strengthening-based exercises. While such interventions primarily target pain and function measures, it is unknown whether psychological measures such as fear-avoidance beliefs (FABs) are also affected.

Clinical question: Is rehabilitation including strengthening exercises effective in improving FABs in individuals with PFP?

Summary of key findings: Three studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the appraisal. All studies found that rehabilitation including strengthening exercises was effective in improving FABs for physical activity, though such improvements were modest. One study found that supplementing a one-time psychological intervention to rehabilitation including strengthening exercises resulted in greater improvements in FABs than with rehabilitation including strengthening exercises alone. Two studies found associations between changes in FABs and changes in pain and/or function outcomes.

Clinical bottom line: There is consistent evidence that the incorporation of rehabilitation with strengthening exercises is effective in improving FABs in individuals with PFP, though such improvements are modest. Furthermore, supplementation with psychological interventions to rehabilitation including strengthening exercises may produce larger improvements in FABs, particularly in patients with an elevated FABs phenotype. As a result of improving FABs, patient outcomes of pain and function may be improved, though future research is needed. Therefore, at this time, we recommend that rehabilitation, including strengthening exercises with supplemental psychological interventions be prescribed for the treatment of PFP particularly in subgroups with elevated FABs, to improve patient outcomes.

Strength of recommendation: Collectively, the body of evidence included to answer the clinical question aligns with the strength of recommendation of A based on the Strength of Recommendation Taxonomy.