External validation of predictive models for antibiotic susceptibility of urine culture

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY BJU International Pub Date : 2024-12-23 DOI:10.1111/bju.16626
Glenn T. Werneburg, Daniel D. Rhoads, Alex Milinovich, Sean McSweeney, Jacob Knorr, Lyla Mourany, Alex Zajichek, Howard B. Goldman, Georges‐Pascal Haber, Sandip P. Vasavada
{"title":"External validation of predictive models for antibiotic susceptibility of urine culture","authors":"Glenn T. Werneburg, Daniel D. Rhoads, Alex Milinovich, Sean McSweeney, Jacob Knorr, Lyla Mourany, Alex Zajichek, Howard B. Goldman, Georges‐Pascal Haber, Sandip P. Vasavada","doi":"10.1111/bju.16626","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveTo develop, externally validate, and test a series of computer algorithms to accurately predict antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) results at the time of clinical diagnosis, up to 3 days before standard urine culture results become available, with the goal of improving antibiotic stewardship and patient outcomes.Patients and MethodsMachine learning algorithms were developed and trained to predict susceptibility or resistance using over 4.7 million discrete AST classifications from urine cultures in a cohort of adult patients from outpatient and inpatient settings from 2012 to 2022. The algorithms were validated on a cohort from a geographically‐distant hospital system, ~1931 km (~1200 miles) from the training cohort facilities, from the same time period. Finally, algorithms were clinically validated in a contemporary cohort and compared to the empiric therapy prescribed by clinicians. Appropriateness of the antibiotics selected by clinicians and the algorithm during the clinical validation was compared.ResultsAlgorithms were accurate during clinical validation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.71–0.94) for all 11 tested antibiotics. The algorithms’ accuracy improved as the organism was identified (AUC 0.79–0.97). In external validation in a geographically‐distant cohort, the algorithms remained accurate even without additional training on this group (AUC 0.69–0.87). When the algorithms were trained on the antibiogram from the geographically‐distant hospital, the accuracy improved (AUC 0.70–0.93). When algorithms’ performances were tested against clinicians in a contemporary cohort for the empiric prescription of oral antibiotics, the drug agent suggested by the algorithms more frequently resulted in adequate empiric coverage.ConclusionsMachine learning algorithms trained on a large dataset are accurate in prediction of urine culture susceptibility vs resistance up to 3 days prior to urine AST availability. Clinical implementation of such an algorithm could improve both clinical care and antimicrobial stewardship.","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16626","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo develop, externally validate, and test a series of computer algorithms to accurately predict antibiotic susceptibility test (AST) results at the time of clinical diagnosis, up to 3 days before standard urine culture results become available, with the goal of improving antibiotic stewardship and patient outcomes.Patients and MethodsMachine learning algorithms were developed and trained to predict susceptibility or resistance using over 4.7 million discrete AST classifications from urine cultures in a cohort of adult patients from outpatient and inpatient settings from 2012 to 2022. The algorithms were validated on a cohort from a geographically‐distant hospital system, ~1931 km (~1200 miles) from the training cohort facilities, from the same time period. Finally, algorithms were clinically validated in a contemporary cohort and compared to the empiric therapy prescribed by clinicians. Appropriateness of the antibiotics selected by clinicians and the algorithm during the clinical validation was compared.ResultsAlgorithms were accurate during clinical validation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.71–0.94) for all 11 tested antibiotics. The algorithms’ accuracy improved as the organism was identified (AUC 0.79–0.97). In external validation in a geographically‐distant cohort, the algorithms remained accurate even without additional training on this group (AUC 0.69–0.87). When the algorithms were trained on the antibiogram from the geographically‐distant hospital, the accuracy improved (AUC 0.70–0.93). When algorithms’ performances were tested against clinicians in a contemporary cohort for the empiric prescription of oral antibiotics, the drug agent suggested by the algorithms more frequently resulted in adequate empiric coverage.ConclusionsMachine learning algorithms trained on a large dataset are accurate in prediction of urine culture susceptibility vs resistance up to 3 days prior to urine AST availability. Clinical implementation of such an algorithm could improve both clinical care and antimicrobial stewardship.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
尿培养抗生素敏感性预测模型的外部验证
目的开发、外部验证和测试一系列计算机算法,以便在临床诊断时准确预测抗生素敏感性试验(AST)结果,最多可在标准尿培养结果公布前3天,以改善抗生素管理和患者预后。研究人员开发并训练了机器学习算法,利用2012年至2022年门诊和住院成年患者尿液培养的470多万个离散AST分类来预测易感性或耐药性。该算法在同一时间段内,在距离培训队列设施约1931公里(约1200英里)的地理位置较远的医院系统的队列中进行验证。最后,在当代队列中对算法进行了临床验证,并与临床医生开出的经验疗法进行了比较。比较临床验证时临床医生选择的抗生素与算法的适宜性。结果对11种抗生素进行临床验证时,算法均准确(受试者工作特征曲线下面积[AUC] 0.71 ~ 0.94)。随着生物的识别,算法的准确性得到提高(AUC为0.79-0.97)。在地理位置较远的队列的外部验证中,即使没有对该组进行额外的训练,算法仍然准确(AUC为0.69-0.87)。当算法在地理位置较远的医院的抗生素谱上进行训练时,准确性得到提高(AUC为0.70-0.93)。当算法的性能与临床医生在当代队列中对口服抗生素的经验性处方进行测试时,算法建议的药物更频繁地导致足够的经验覆盖。结论在大数据集上训练的机器学习算法在尿AST可用前3天预测尿培养敏感性和耐药性方面是准确的。这种算法的临床实施可以改善临床护理和抗菌药物管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
期刊最新文献
Case of the month from the Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Florida, USA: bladder outlet obstruction-induced urinothorax after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Irreversible electroporation of localised prostate cancer downregulates immune suppression and induces systemic anti-tumour T-cell activation - IRE-IMMUNO study. Long-term outcomes of bladder-sparing therapy vs radical cystectomy in BCG-unresponsive non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Inheritance patterns of lower urinary tract symptoms in adults: a systematic review. Robotic appendiceal ureteric interposition or replacement: the surgical technique.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1