Cholinergic regulation of decision making under risk of punishment.

Abstract

The ability to choose between options that differ in their risks and rewards depends on brain regions within the mesocorticolimbic circuit and regulation of their activity by neurotransmitter systems. Dopamine neurotransmission in particular plays a critical role in modulating such risk-taking behavior; however, the contribution of other major modulatory neurotransmitters, such as acetylcholine, is not as well-defined, especially for decision making in which the risk associated with more rewarding outcomes involves adverse consequences. Consequently, the goal of the current experiments was to examine how cholinergic signaling influences decision making involving risk of explicit punishment. Male and female rats were trained in a decision-making task in which they chose between a small safe food reward and a larger food reward accompanied by a risk of footshock punishment. After training in this task, the effects of nicotinic and muscarinic agonists and antagonists on risk-taking performance were evaluated. Neither nicotine, a nicotinic receptor agonist, nor mecamylamine, a nicotinic receptor antagonist, affected preference for the risky lever, although mecamylamine did alter latencies to press the risky lever and the percentage of omissions. The muscarinic receptor agonist oxotremorine decreased preference for the large, risky lever; similar effects on behavior were observed with the administration of the muscarinic receptor antagonist scopolamine. Control experiments were therefore conducted in which these same muscarinic receptor ligands were administered prior to testing in a reward discrimination task. These experiments revealed that the effects of oxotremorine and scopolamine on risk taking may be due to altered motivational processes rather than to changes in sensitivity to risk of punishment. Importantly, there were no sex differences in the effects of cholinergic manipulations on preference for the large, risky lever. Collectively, these findings suggest that in both males and females, cholinergic signaling via muscarinic receptors is involved in decision making involving risk of explicit punishment, with a specific role in modulating sensitivity to differences in reward magnitude. Future studies will expand upon this work by exploring whether targeting cholinergic receptors has therapeutic potential for psychiatric conditions in which risk taking is pathologically altered.