Brain age in genetic and idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

IF 4.1 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain communications Pub Date : 2024-12-20 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/braincomms/fcae382
Stefan J Teipel, Hauke Hoffmann, Alexander Storch, Andreas Hermann, Martin Dyrba, Julia Schumacher
{"title":"Brain age in genetic and idiopathic Parkinson's disease.","authors":"Stefan J Teipel, Hauke Hoffmann, Alexander Storch, Andreas Hermann, Martin Dyrba, Julia Schumacher","doi":"10.1093/braincomms/fcae382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The brain-age gap, i.e. the difference between the brain age estimated from structural MRI data and the chronological age of an individual, has been proposed as a summary measure of brain integrity in neurodegenerative diseases. Here, we aimed to determine the brain-age gap in genetic and idiopathic Parkinson's disease and its association with surrogate markers of Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease pathology and with rates of cognitive and motor function decline. We studied 1200 cases from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative cohort, including idiopathic Parkinson's disease, asymptomatic and clinical mutation carriers in the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 gene (LRRK2) and the glucocerebrosidase gene (GBA), and normal controls using a cohort study design. For comparison, we studied 187 Alzheimer's disease dementia cases and 254 controls from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort. We used Bayesian ANOVA to determine associations of the brain-age gap with diagnosis, and baseline measures of motor and cognitive function, dopamine transporter activity and CSF markers of Alzheimer's disease type amyloid-β42 and phosphotau pathology. Associations of brain-age gap with rates of cognitive and motor function decline were determined using Bayesian generalized mixed effect models. The brain-age gap in idiopathic Parkinson's disease patients was 0.7 years compared to controls, but 5.9 years in Alzheimer's disease dementia cases. In contrast, asymptomatic LRRK2 individuals had a 1.1. year younger brain age than controls. Across all cases, the brain-age gap was associated with motor impairment and (in the clinically manifest PD cases) reduced dopamine transporter activity, but less with CSF amyloid-β42 and phosphotau. In idiopathic Parkinson's disease cases, however, the brain-age gap was associated with lower CSF amyloid-β42 levels. In sporadic and genetic Parkinson's disease cases, a higher brain-age gap was associated with faster decline in episodic memory, and executive and motor function, whereas in asymptomatic LRRK2 cases, a smaller brain-age gap was associated with faster cognitive decline. In conclusion, brain age was sensitive to Alzheimer's disease like rather than Parkinson's disease like brain atrophy. Once an individual had idiopathic Parkinson's disease, their brain age was associated with markers of Alzheimer's disease rather than Parkinson's disease. Asymptomatic LRRK2 cases had seemingly younger brains than controls, and in these cases, younger brain age was associated with poorer cognitive outcome. This suggests that the term brain age is misleading when applied to disease stages where reactive brain changes with apparent volume increases rather than atrophy may drive the calculation of the brain age.</p>","PeriodicalId":93915,"journal":{"name":"Brain communications","volume":"6 6","pages":"fcae382"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11660940/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/braincomms/fcae382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The brain-age gap, i.e. the difference between the brain age estimated from structural MRI data and the chronological age of an individual, has been proposed as a summary measure of brain integrity in neurodegenerative diseases. Here, we aimed to determine the brain-age gap in genetic and idiopathic Parkinson's disease and its association with surrogate markers of Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease pathology and with rates of cognitive and motor function decline. We studied 1200 cases from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative cohort, including idiopathic Parkinson's disease, asymptomatic and clinical mutation carriers in the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 gene (LRRK2) and the glucocerebrosidase gene (GBA), and normal controls using a cohort study design. For comparison, we studied 187 Alzheimer's disease dementia cases and 254 controls from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort. We used Bayesian ANOVA to determine associations of the brain-age gap with diagnosis, and baseline measures of motor and cognitive function, dopamine transporter activity and CSF markers of Alzheimer's disease type amyloid-β42 and phosphotau pathology. Associations of brain-age gap with rates of cognitive and motor function decline were determined using Bayesian generalized mixed effect models. The brain-age gap in idiopathic Parkinson's disease patients was 0.7 years compared to controls, but 5.9 years in Alzheimer's disease dementia cases. In contrast, asymptomatic LRRK2 individuals had a 1.1. year younger brain age than controls. Across all cases, the brain-age gap was associated with motor impairment and (in the clinically manifest PD cases) reduced dopamine transporter activity, but less with CSF amyloid-β42 and phosphotau. In idiopathic Parkinson's disease cases, however, the brain-age gap was associated with lower CSF amyloid-β42 levels. In sporadic and genetic Parkinson's disease cases, a higher brain-age gap was associated with faster decline in episodic memory, and executive and motor function, whereas in asymptomatic LRRK2 cases, a smaller brain-age gap was associated with faster cognitive decline. In conclusion, brain age was sensitive to Alzheimer's disease like rather than Parkinson's disease like brain atrophy. Once an individual had idiopathic Parkinson's disease, their brain age was associated with markers of Alzheimer's disease rather than Parkinson's disease. Asymptomatic LRRK2 cases had seemingly younger brains than controls, and in these cases, younger brain age was associated with poorer cognitive outcome. This suggests that the term brain age is misleading when applied to disease stages where reactive brain changes with apparent volume increases rather than atrophy may drive the calculation of the brain age.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遗传和特发性帕金森病的脑年龄。
脑年龄差距,即从结构MRI数据估计的脑年龄与个体实足年龄之间的差异,已被提议作为神经退行性疾病中脑完整性的综合衡量标准。在这里,我们的目的是确定遗传性和特发性帕金森病的脑年龄差距及其与阿尔茨海默病和帕金森病病理替代标志物以及认知和运动功能下降率的关系。我们采用队列研究设计,研究了1200例来自帕金森进展标志物倡议队列的患者,包括特发性帕金森病患者、富亮氨酸重复激酶2基因(LRRK2)和葡萄糖脑苷酶基因(GBA)的无症状和临床突变携带者以及正常对照。为了进行比较,我们研究了187例阿尔茨海默病痴呆病例和来自阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议队列的254例对照。我们使用贝叶斯方差分析(Bayesian ANOVA)来确定脑年龄差距与诊断、运动和认知功能、多巴胺转运蛋白活性以及阿尔茨海默病型淀粉样蛋白-β42和磷蛋白病理的脑脊液标志物的基线测量之间的关系。使用贝叶斯广义混合效应模型确定脑年龄差距与认知和运动功能下降率的关系。与对照组相比,特发性帕金森病患者的脑年龄差距为0.7岁,而阿尔茨海默病痴呆患者的脑年龄差距为5.9岁。相比之下,无症状的LRRK2个体为1.1。大脑年龄比对照组小一岁。在所有病例中,脑年龄差距与运动障碍有关,(在临床表现为PD的病例中)多巴胺转运蛋白活性降低,但脑脊液淀粉样蛋白-β42和磷蛋白活性降低较少。然而,在特发性帕金森病病例中,脑年龄差距与脑脊液淀粉样蛋白-β42水平降低有关。在散发性和遗传性帕金森病病例中,较高的脑年龄差距与情景记忆、执行和运动功能的更快下降有关,而在无症状的LRRK2病例中,较小的脑年龄差距与更快的认知能力下降有关。总之,大脑年龄对阿尔茨海默病而不是帕金森病的脑萎缩敏感。一旦一个人患有特发性帕金森病,他们的大脑年龄与阿尔茨海默病的标志物有关,而不是与帕金森病有关。无症状LRRK2患者的大脑似乎比对照组年轻,在这些病例中,年轻的大脑年龄与较差的认知结果相关。这表明,脑年龄一词在应用于疾病阶段时是具有误导性的,在疾病阶段,反应性脑变化随着明显体积的增加而不是萎缩可能会驱动脑年龄的计算。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
The challenge of long-term stroke outcome prediction and how statistical correlates do not imply predictive value. Early subacute frontal callosal microstructure and language outcomes after stroke. Evaluating conversion from mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease with structural MRI: a machine learning study. Adult phenotypes of genetic developmental and epileptic encephalopathies. Multidimensional structural analyses revealed a correlation between thalamic atrophy and white matter degeneration in idiopathic dystonia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1