The Impact of Non-Pharmacological Sleep Interventions on Delirium Prevention and Sleep Improvement in Postoperative ICU Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Jiaqi Li, Yingying Fan, Ruoyu Luo, Na Yin, Yangyang Wang, Jiyong Jing, Ju Zhang
{"title":"The Impact of Non-Pharmacological Sleep Interventions on Delirium Prevention and Sleep Improvement in Postoperative ICU Patients: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Jiaqi Li, Yingying Fan, Ruoyu Luo, Na Yin, Yangyang Wang, Jiyong Jing, Ju Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103925","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Analyze the effectiveness of different non-pharmacological sleep interventions in preventing delirium among postoperative ICU patients.</p><p><strong>Research methodology: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, OpenGrey and reference lists up to May 2024.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>We systematically searched all randomized controlled trials related to non-pharmacological sleep interventions for the prevention of delirium.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results of the network meta-analysis showed that, compared to Usual Care, multicomponent interventions are the most effective measures for preventing delirium in postoperative ICU patients (RR = 0.32, 95 % CI = 0.20 to 0.51). This is followed by non-pharmacological sleep interventions aimed at stress relief (RR = 0.60, 95 % CI = 0.41 to 0.89) and circadian rhythm (RR = 0.61, 95 % CI = 0.39 to 0.96). Additionally, non-pharmacological sleep interventions focusing on circadian rhythm demonstrated an improvement in sleep quality among postoperative ICU patients (SMD = -0.99, 95 % CI = -1.88 to -0.11).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study found that multicomponent non-pharmacological sleep interventions are effective in reducing the incidence of delirium in postoperative ICU patients. Furthermore, non-pharmacological interventions focused on circadian rhythm regulation significantly enhance sleep quality among these patients.</p><p><strong>Implications for clinical practice: </strong>Based on this study, intensive care units and nursing staff have an opportunity to implement the most effective non-pharmacological sleep interventions to prevent delirium and improve sleep quality in postoperative ICU patients. This could contribute to a reduction in the incidence of delirium in postoperative ICU patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94043,"journal":{"name":"Intensive & critical care nursing","volume":"87 ","pages":"103925"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive & critical care nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2024.103925","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Analyze the effectiveness of different non-pharmacological sleep interventions in preventing delirium among postoperative ICU patients.

Research methodology: We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, CINAHL, OpenGrey and reference lists up to May 2024.

Setting: We systematically searched all randomized controlled trials related to non-pharmacological sleep interventions for the prevention of delirium.

Results: The results of the network meta-analysis showed that, compared to Usual Care, multicomponent interventions are the most effective measures for preventing delirium in postoperative ICU patients (RR = 0.32, 95 % CI = 0.20 to 0.51). This is followed by non-pharmacological sleep interventions aimed at stress relief (RR = 0.60, 95 % CI = 0.41 to 0.89) and circadian rhythm (RR = 0.61, 95 % CI = 0.39 to 0.96). Additionally, non-pharmacological sleep interventions focusing on circadian rhythm demonstrated an improvement in sleep quality among postoperative ICU patients (SMD = -0.99, 95 % CI = -1.88 to -0.11).

Conclusions: Our study found that multicomponent non-pharmacological sleep interventions are effective in reducing the incidence of delirium in postoperative ICU patients. Furthermore, non-pharmacological interventions focused on circadian rhythm regulation significantly enhance sleep quality among these patients.

Implications for clinical practice: Based on this study, intensive care units and nursing staff have an opportunity to implement the most effective non-pharmacological sleep interventions to prevent delirium and improve sleep quality in postoperative ICU patients. This could contribute to a reduction in the incidence of delirium in postoperative ICU patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非药物睡眠干预对ICU术后患者谵妄预防和睡眠改善的影响:系统综述和网络荟萃分析
目的:分析不同非药物睡眠干预措施对预防ICU术后患者谵妄的效果。研究方法:我们对PubMed、Cochrane Library、Web of Science、Embase、CINAHL、OpenGrey和参考文献进行了全面检索,检索截止到2024年5月。背景:我们系统地检索了所有与非药物睡眠干预预防谵妄相关的随机对照试验。结果:网络荟萃分析结果显示,与常规护理相比,多组分干预是预防ICU术后患者谵妄最有效的措施(RR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.20 ~ 0.51)。其次是旨在缓解压力的非药物睡眠干预(RR = 0.60, 95% CI = 0.41至0.89)和昼夜节律(RR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.39至0.96)。此外,关注昼夜节律的非药物睡眠干预表明,术后ICU患者的睡眠质量得到改善(SMD = -0.99, 95% CI = -1.88至-0.11)。结论:本研究发现,多组分非药物睡眠干预可有效降低ICU术后患者谵妄的发生率。此外,专注于昼夜节律调节的非药物干预措施显著提高了这些患者的睡眠质量。对临床实践的启示:基于本研究,重症监护病房和护理人员有机会实施最有效的非药物睡眠干预措施,以预防谵妄和改善ICU术后患者的睡眠质量。这可能有助于降低ICU术后患者谵妄的发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Global predictors of tracheostomy-related pressure injury in the COVID-19 era: A study of secondary data. Risk factors for colonisation by Multidrug-Resistant bacteria in critical care units. Independent risk factors for ventilator-associated pneumonia: A multi-ICU cohort study. Stepwise implementation of prevention strategies and their impact on ventilator-associated pneumonia incidence: A 13-Year observational surveillance study. Relationship between microaspiration and ventilator-associated events: A post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1