The impact of clearly defined debriefing practices on nurses working within an adult intensive care: A systematic review

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 NURSING Intensive and Critical Care Nursing Pub Date : 2025-03-10 DOI:10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103997
Annabel Levido , Fiona Coyer , Samantha Keogh , Natalie Barker , Liz Crowe
{"title":"The impact of clearly defined debriefing practices on nurses working within an adult intensive care: A systematic review","authors":"Annabel Levido ,&nbsp;Fiona Coyer ,&nbsp;Samantha Keogh ,&nbsp;Natalie Barker ,&nbsp;Liz Crowe","doi":"10.1016/j.iccn.2025.103997","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To critically analyse and synthesise the literature describing the relationship between a debriefing intervention and wellbeing in the distinct population of registered nurses working in the adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The JBI literature review methodology was used to analyse primary research exploring a clearly defined debriefing process with an aim to improving wellbeing in the setting and population of ICU nurses. A comprehensive search of primary research published between 1st January 2004 and 9th May 2024 was conducted. A systematic search was conducted across multiple scholarly databases: APA PsycInfo, CINAHL Complete, PubMed and Embase. Google Scholar and reference lists were also searched. Data from the included studies were extracted by one author, and then checked and verified by a second author. Included studies are summarised according to study details, debriefing characteristics and reported wellbeing results. Studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The search yielded 732 articles, with 12 articles screened in full-text format. Three primary research studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies utilised a mixed methods design, there was significant heterogeneity between logistical components of the debriefing intervention as well as study instruments and reporting.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This systematic review illustrates a paucity of available research on the specificity of debriefing practices and the potential relationship to wellbeing in the ICU nursing population.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for clinical practice</h3><div>Further rigorous research is required surrounding the implementation and effectiveness of debriefing in the unique population of ICU nurses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51322,"journal":{"name":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","volume":"88 ","pages":"Article 103997"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intensive and Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0964339725000588","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To critically analyse and synthesise the literature describing the relationship between a debriefing intervention and wellbeing in the distinct population of registered nurses working in the adult Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

Methods

The JBI literature review methodology was used to analyse primary research exploring a clearly defined debriefing process with an aim to improving wellbeing in the setting and population of ICU nurses. A comprehensive search of primary research published between 1st January 2004 and 9th May 2024 was conducted. A systematic search was conducted across multiple scholarly databases: APA PsycInfo, CINAHL Complete, PubMed and Embase. Google Scholar and reference lists were also searched. Data from the included studies were extracted by one author, and then checked and verified by a second author. Included studies are summarised according to study details, debriefing characteristics and reported wellbeing results. Studies were appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool.

Results

The search yielded 732 articles, with 12 articles screened in full-text format. Three primary research studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies utilised a mixed methods design, there was significant heterogeneity between logistical components of the debriefing intervention as well as study instruments and reporting.

Conclusion

This systematic review illustrates a paucity of available research on the specificity of debriefing practices and the potential relationship to wellbeing in the ICU nursing population.

Implications for clinical practice

Further rigorous research is required surrounding the implementation and effectiveness of debriefing in the unique population of ICU nurses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
57 days
期刊介绍: The aims of Intensive and Critical Care Nursing are to promote excellence of care of critically ill patients by specialist nurses and their professional colleagues; to provide an international and interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and exchange of research findings, experience and ideas; to develop and enhance the knowledge, skills, attitudes and creative thinking essential to good critical care nursing practice. The journal publishes reviews, updates and feature articles in addition to original papers and significant preliminary communications. Articles may deal with any part of practice including relevant clinical, research, educational, psychological and technological aspects.
期刊最新文献
The impact of clearly defined debriefing practices on nurses working within an adult intensive care: A systematic review Critical care nurses’ intention to leave and related factors: Survey results from 5 European countries Occurrence rate and risk factors for rest and procedural pain in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Delirium management in 2024: A status check and evolution in clinical practice since 2016 “Do we still need central venous pressure monitoring in the ICU? No!”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1