Usability testing of a palliative care information resource - outcomes from the formative evaluation of the CarerHelp Toolkit prototype.

A Adams, L Miller-Lewis, J Tieman
{"title":"Usability testing of a palliative care information resource - outcomes from the formative evaluation of the CarerHelp Toolkit prototype.","authors":"A Adams, L Miller-Lewis, J Tieman","doi":"10.1080/17538157.2024.2433942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>CarerHelp is an online resource supporting Australian family carers providing palliative care to loved ones at home. To confidently care for a dying person, family carers require access to evidence-based resources, accessible day or night when healthcare professionals or services are unavailable. Given carer diversity, usability evaluations assist online developers in shaping information experiences to family carer's needs and abilities. This study aimed to use a comprehensive usability testing protocol to evaluate the prototype, with a sample involving six family carers aged 36-74 years. A concurrent think-aloud approach generated quantitative and qualitative feedback from scenario-based tasks. Single ease questions (SEQ) and computer satisfaction usability questionnaire (CSUQ) assessed end-user attitudes. Performance, SEQ, and CSUQ were calculated, errors were analyzed, and severity rating applied. Overall, family carers identified 54 errors. All carers detected highly severe errors impacting critical function; technical ability influenced error detection, affecting navigation, utility, and content. Language modification was guided by family carers' narratives, contextualizing interface use with real-life experiences. For the multidisciplinary development team, formal reporting of findings was advantageous in informing meaningful reiterative interface changes and giving a voice to family carers. This approach was essential to assist as many carers as possible in accessing palliative care information when needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":101409,"journal":{"name":"Informatics for health & social care","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics for health & social care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2024.2433942","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CarerHelp is an online resource supporting Australian family carers providing palliative care to loved ones at home. To confidently care for a dying person, family carers require access to evidence-based resources, accessible day or night when healthcare professionals or services are unavailable. Given carer diversity, usability evaluations assist online developers in shaping information experiences to family carer's needs and abilities. This study aimed to use a comprehensive usability testing protocol to evaluate the prototype, with a sample involving six family carers aged 36-74 years. A concurrent think-aloud approach generated quantitative and qualitative feedback from scenario-based tasks. Single ease questions (SEQ) and computer satisfaction usability questionnaire (CSUQ) assessed end-user attitudes. Performance, SEQ, and CSUQ were calculated, errors were analyzed, and severity rating applied. Overall, family carers identified 54 errors. All carers detected highly severe errors impacting critical function; technical ability influenced error detection, affecting navigation, utility, and content. Language modification was guided by family carers' narratives, contextualizing interface use with real-life experiences. For the multidisciplinary development team, formal reporting of findings was advantageous in informing meaningful reiterative interface changes and giving a voice to family carers. This approach was essential to assist as many carers as possible in accessing palliative care information when needed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一个姑息治疗信息资源的可用性测试——从carehelp工具包原型的形成性评估的结果。
carehelp是一个在线资源,支持澳大利亚家庭护理人员在家中为亲人提供姑息治疗。为了自信地照护临终者,家庭照护者需要获得基于证据的资源,在没有卫生保健专业人员或服务的情况下,无论白天还是晚上都可以获得这些资源。考虑到照顾者的多样性,可用性评估有助于在线开发人员根据家庭照顾者的需求和能力塑造信息体验。本研究旨在使用全面的可用性测试协议来评估原型,样本涉及6名年龄在36-74岁之间的家庭护理人员。并发的有声思考方法从基于场景的任务生成定量和定性反馈。单简单问题(SEQ)和计算机满意度可用性问卷(CSUQ)评估最终用户的态度。计算性能、SEQ和CSUQ,分析错误,并应用严重性等级。总的来说,家庭护理人员发现了54个错误。所有护理人员都发现了影响关键功能的严重错误;技术能力影响错误检测,影响导航、实用程序和内容。语言修改以家庭照顾者的叙述为指导,将界面使用与现实生活经验相结合。对于多学科开发团队来说,正式报告研究结果有利于告知有意义的重复界面变化,并给予家庭照顾者发言权。这种方法对于帮助尽可能多的护理人员在需要时获取姑息治疗信息至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validation of the eHealth literacy scales: comparison between the shorter and longer versions. User-centred design of a patient portal for persons living with home mechanical ventilation and long-term tracheostomy: a mixed methods study. Usability testing of a palliative care information resource - outcomes from the formative evaluation of the CarerHelp Toolkit prototype. Identifying biological markers and sociodemographic factors that influence the gap between phenotypic and chronological ages. Multimorbidity in neurodegenerative diseases: a network analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1