Species distribution models built with local species data perform better for current time, but suffer from niche truncation

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agricultural and Forest Meteorology Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110361
Nicolò Anselmetto , Donato Morresi , Simona Barbarino , Nicola Loglisci , Matthew G. Betts , Matteo Garbarino
{"title":"Species distribution models built with local species data perform better for current time, but suffer from niche truncation","authors":"Nicolò Anselmetto ,&nbsp;Donato Morresi ,&nbsp;Simona Barbarino ,&nbsp;Nicola Loglisci ,&nbsp;Matthew G. Betts ,&nbsp;Matteo Garbarino","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To cope with climate change-induced alterations, forest ecosystems’ conservation and restoration require models that are both capable to incorporate current local-scale dynamics but also to anticipate future changes. These requirements may be fulfilled by robust assessments of response (i.e., species data such as forest inventories) and predictor (e.g., climate) variables. The aim of this study is to predict current and future probability of occurrence for 22 tree species comparing inventory and climate data at different spatial scales and test for model performance, reliability, and niche truncation.</div><div>We built species distribution models (SDMs) for 22 tree species of Piedmont, an Alpine administrative region of north-western Italy. We compared (i) a fine-scale model calibrated with a local forest inventory with a 250-m spatial resolution at the extent of Piedmont and a regional climate model calibrated on the Italian extent versus (ii) coarse-scale model calibrated with a pan-European forest inventory (EU-Forest) at 1-km resolution and a global climate dataset (CHELSA v1.2). Moreover, (iii) we developed a data pooling method by combining the species data and using CHELSA. We evaluated models using spatial-block cross-validation and external validation through several metrics. We predicted the probability of occurrence for current and future under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 climate scenarios.</div><div>Models built with local species data performed better for the future than those incorporating broad species data and their current predictions reflected the realized distribution of species but they suffered from niche truncation while extrapolated to the future. Indeed, models calibrated at the local scale predicted greater magnitude of changes for future scenarios compared to coarse-scale models. Integrating species data at different extents and resolutions is a valid approach when both are available.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"362 ","pages":"Article 110361"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016819232400474X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To cope with climate change-induced alterations, forest ecosystems’ conservation and restoration require models that are both capable to incorporate current local-scale dynamics but also to anticipate future changes. These requirements may be fulfilled by robust assessments of response (i.e., species data such as forest inventories) and predictor (e.g., climate) variables. The aim of this study is to predict current and future probability of occurrence for 22 tree species comparing inventory and climate data at different spatial scales and test for model performance, reliability, and niche truncation.
We built species distribution models (SDMs) for 22 tree species of Piedmont, an Alpine administrative region of north-western Italy. We compared (i) a fine-scale model calibrated with a local forest inventory with a 250-m spatial resolution at the extent of Piedmont and a regional climate model calibrated on the Italian extent versus (ii) coarse-scale model calibrated with a pan-European forest inventory (EU-Forest) at 1-km resolution and a global climate dataset (CHELSA v1.2). Moreover, (iii) we developed a data pooling method by combining the species data and using CHELSA. We evaluated models using spatial-block cross-validation and external validation through several metrics. We predicted the probability of occurrence for current and future under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 climate scenarios.
Models built with local species data performed better for the future than those incorporating broad species data and their current predictions reflected the realized distribution of species but they suffered from niche truncation while extrapolated to the future. Indeed, models calibrated at the local scale predicted greater magnitude of changes for future scenarios compared to coarse-scale models. Integrating species data at different extents and resolutions is a valid approach when both are available.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用局部物种数据建立的物种分布模型对当前时间有较好的适应性,但存在生态位截断的问题
为了应对气候变化引起的变化,森林生态系统的保护和恢复需要既能纳入当前局地尺度动态又能预测未来变化的模型。这些要求可以通过对响应(如森林清查等物种数据)和预测变量(如气候)进行强有力的评估来满足。本研究的目的是通过比较不同空间尺度下的库存和气候数据,预测22种树种当前和未来的发生概率,并对模型的性能、可靠性和生态位截断进行检验。本文对意大利西北部阿尔卑斯行政区域皮埃蒙特的22种树种建立了物种分布模型(SDMs)。我们比较了(i)在皮埃蒙特范围内用250米空间分辨率的当地森林清查校准的精细尺度模型和在意大利范围内校准的区域气候模型,以及(ii)用1公里分辨率的泛欧森林清查(EU-Forest)和全球气候数据集(CHELSA v1.2)校准的粗尺度模型。(3)结合物种数据,利用CHELSA建立了数据池方法。我们通过几个指标使用空间块交叉验证和外部验证来评估模型。我们预测了RCP4.5和RCP8.5气候情景下当前和未来发生的概率。利用局地物种数据建立的模型对未来的预测效果优于利用广地物种数据建立的模型,其目前的预测反映了物种的实际分布,但在外推到未来时存在生态位截断的问题。事实上,与粗尺度模型相比,在局部尺度上校准的模型预测未来情景的变化幅度更大。整合不同程度和分辨率的物种数据是一种有效的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
期刊最新文献
Deep percolation and soil water dynamics under different sand-fixing vegetation types in two different precipitation regions in semiarid sandy Land, Northern China Evaluating the sensitivity of vegetation indices to leaf area index variability at individual tree level using multispectral drone acquisitions Global vegetation vulnerability to drought is underestimated due to the lagged effect Rice yield stability and its determinants across different rice-cropping systems in China Robust filling of extra-long gaps in eddy covariance CO2 flux measurements from a temperate deciduous forest using eXtreme Gradient Boosting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1