Avian communities show distinct responses to forest-to-bog restoration.

IF 8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Journal of Environmental Management Pub Date : 2024-12-22 DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123763
Colin Guilfoyle, John Lusby, Elvira de Eyto, Heather T Lally, Conor T Graham
{"title":"Avian communities show distinct responses to forest-to-bog restoration.","authors":"Colin Guilfoyle, John Lusby, Elvira de Eyto, Heather T Lally, Conor T Graham","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123763","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Since the 1990's, attempted restoration of blanket bogs which have been previously afforested with non-native conifers has taken place in Ireland and Britain, with the aim of reinstating hydrological functioning and hence, peatland biodiversity. Here, we assess the conservation benefit of these restoration measures at sites in the west of Ireland, 16-20 years post works, by comparing avian communities between trios of restored (n = 6), near-natural (n = 6), and afforested (n = 6) lowland blanket bogs. We assessed avian community response in terms of differences in the richness and density of all bird species and of Birds of Conservation Concern in Ireland (BoCCI), as well as community composition. We also investigated which structural habitat variables were responsible for variation in community composition among site types. Restoration resulted in no changes in overall species richness and lower overall bird density but importantly, increased BoCCI richness in comparison to afforested sites. In particular, restoration benefited red-listed species, with richness and density of these species being similar to that of near-natural sites. Avian communities of restored sites were variable but more similar overall to those of near-natural than afforested sites, indicating partial restoration success. Changes in conifer cover, dwarf shrub height, deadwood cover, and broadleaf cover explained the majority of variation occurring across site types. These results indicate that the response of avian communities following forest-to-bog restoration is a prolonged process influenced by the evolving habitat structure, which, in turn, is contingent on the effectiveness of hydrological restoration measures, local conditions and ongoing management.</p>","PeriodicalId":356,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Management","volume":"373 ","pages":"123763"},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123763","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since the 1990's, attempted restoration of blanket bogs which have been previously afforested with non-native conifers has taken place in Ireland and Britain, with the aim of reinstating hydrological functioning and hence, peatland biodiversity. Here, we assess the conservation benefit of these restoration measures at sites in the west of Ireland, 16-20 years post works, by comparing avian communities between trios of restored (n = 6), near-natural (n = 6), and afforested (n = 6) lowland blanket bogs. We assessed avian community response in terms of differences in the richness and density of all bird species and of Birds of Conservation Concern in Ireland (BoCCI), as well as community composition. We also investigated which structural habitat variables were responsible for variation in community composition among site types. Restoration resulted in no changes in overall species richness and lower overall bird density but importantly, increased BoCCI richness in comparison to afforested sites. In particular, restoration benefited red-listed species, with richness and density of these species being similar to that of near-natural sites. Avian communities of restored sites were variable but more similar overall to those of near-natural than afforested sites, indicating partial restoration success. Changes in conifer cover, dwarf shrub height, deadwood cover, and broadleaf cover explained the majority of variation occurring across site types. These results indicate that the response of avian communities following forest-to-bog restoration is a prolonged process influenced by the evolving habitat structure, which, in turn, is contingent on the effectiveness of hydrological restoration measures, local conditions and ongoing management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Environmental Management
Journal of Environmental Management 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
5.70%
发文量
2477
审稿时长
84 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Management is a journal for the publication of peer reviewed, original research for all aspects of management and the managed use of the environment, both natural and man-made.Critical review articles are also welcome; submission of these is strongly encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Seagrass population dynamics and biodiversity assemblages indicate negative effects of short-term nutrient enrichment in tropical island ecosystem. The nonlinear regression trees for retrieving missed data during sea-level measurement. Toward the development of an ML-driven decision support system for wastewater treatment: A bacterial inactivation prediction approach in solar photochemical processes. Avian communities show distinct responses to forest-to-bog restoration. Evaluating the effectiveness of community-informed resource dissemination at increasing knowledge and testing rates among private well water owners in a statewide population.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1