Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for the Management of Preoperative Anxiety-Related Insomnia: A Randomized, Three-Blinded, Clinical Trial Compared with Lorazepam and Placebo.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Drug Design, Development and Therapy Pub Date : 2024-12-17 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.2147/DDDT.S487463
Wen-Yi Yang, Kuan Huang, Zhi-Jian Lin, Wen Zeng, Xin Liu, Hong-Bo Liu, Mao-Lin Zhong, Jun Wei, Wei-Dong Liang, Li-Feng Wang, Li Chen
{"title":"Intranasal Dexmedetomidine for the Management of Preoperative Anxiety-Related Insomnia: A Randomized, Three-Blinded, Clinical Trial Compared with Lorazepam and Placebo.","authors":"Wen-Yi Yang, Kuan Huang, Zhi-Jian Lin, Wen Zeng, Xin Liu, Hong-Bo Liu, Mao-Lin Zhong, Jun Wei, Wei-Dong Liang, Li-Feng Wang, Li Chen","doi":"10.2147/DDDT.S487463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasal dexmedetomidine (Dex), oral lorazepam, and a placebo in managing preoperative anxiety-related insomnia.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 90 patients exhibiting symptoms of preoperative anxiety and insomnia were randomly assigned to three groups: Dex (receiving 2.5 µg/kg Dex intranasally and starch tablets orally), lorazepam (receiving saline intranasally and 2 mg lorazepam orally), and placebo (receiving saline intranasally and starch tablets orally). Interventions were conducted the night before surgery. The primary outcome was measured using the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) to evaluate changes in sleep quality pre- and post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included monitoring sleep on the night of the intervention, sleep satisfaction scores, changes in vital signs within 2 hours post-intervention, and adverse reaction rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to sleep assessments using the LSEQ, the Dex group demonstrated significant improvements in ease of getting to sleep (GTS), ease of awakening (AFS), and alertness and behavior after waking (BFW) compared to the lorazepam group (<i>p</i> < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in the quality of sleep (QOS) between the two groups (<i>p</i> > 0.05). Sleep monitoring indicated that the Dex group had a median sleep onset latency (SOL) of 19.0 min, significantly shorter than those recorded for the lorazepam group at 33.5 min and the placebo group at 57.0 min (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The total sleep time (TST) and sleep efficiency (SE) were 403.7 min and 84.5% for the Dex group, similar to the lorazepam group (408.6 min, 83.2%)(<i>p</i> >0.999) and superior to the placebo group (278.8 min, 57.4%)(<i>p</i> < 0.001). Sleep satisfaction scores did not significantly differ between the Dex and lorazepam groups (<i>p</i> > 0.999). No serious adverse reactions were reported across the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both 2.5 μg/kg intranasal Dex and 2 mg oral lorazepam effectively improved sleep quality in patients with preoperative anxiety-related insomnia. While both treatments were comparable in maintaining sleep, intranasal Dex was more effective in initiating sleep and enhancing daytime functionality than lorazepam.</p>","PeriodicalId":11290,"journal":{"name":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","volume":"18 ","pages":"6061-6073"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11663697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug Design, Development and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/DDDT.S487463","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intranasal dexmedetomidine (Dex), oral lorazepam, and a placebo in managing preoperative anxiety-related insomnia.

Patients and methods: A total of 90 patients exhibiting symptoms of preoperative anxiety and insomnia were randomly assigned to three groups: Dex (receiving 2.5 µg/kg Dex intranasally and starch tablets orally), lorazepam (receiving saline intranasally and 2 mg lorazepam orally), and placebo (receiving saline intranasally and starch tablets orally). Interventions were conducted the night before surgery. The primary outcome was measured using the Leeds Sleep Evaluation Questionnaire (LSEQ) to evaluate changes in sleep quality pre- and post-intervention. Secondary outcomes included monitoring sleep on the night of the intervention, sleep satisfaction scores, changes in vital signs within 2 hours post-intervention, and adverse reaction rates.

Results: According to sleep assessments using the LSEQ, the Dex group demonstrated significant improvements in ease of getting to sleep (GTS), ease of awakening (AFS), and alertness and behavior after waking (BFW) compared to the lorazepam group (p < 0.05). However, no significant differences were observed in the quality of sleep (QOS) between the two groups (p > 0.05). Sleep monitoring indicated that the Dex group had a median sleep onset latency (SOL) of 19.0 min, significantly shorter than those recorded for the lorazepam group at 33.5 min and the placebo group at 57.0 min (p < 0.001). The total sleep time (TST) and sleep efficiency (SE) were 403.7 min and 84.5% for the Dex group, similar to the lorazepam group (408.6 min, 83.2%)(p >0.999) and superior to the placebo group (278.8 min, 57.4%)(p < 0.001). Sleep satisfaction scores did not significantly differ between the Dex and lorazepam groups (p > 0.999). No serious adverse reactions were reported across the groups.

Conclusion: Both 2.5 μg/kg intranasal Dex and 2 mg oral lorazepam effectively improved sleep quality in patients with preoperative anxiety-related insomnia. While both treatments were comparable in maintaining sleep, intranasal Dex was more effective in initiating sleep and enhancing daytime functionality than lorazepam.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鼻内右美托咪定治疗术前焦虑性失眠:一项与劳拉西泮和安慰剂比较的随机、三盲临床试验
目的:评价鼻内右美托咪定(Dex)、口服劳拉西泮和安慰剂治疗术前焦虑性失眠的疗效和安全性。患者和方法:将90例术前出现焦虑和失眠症状的患者随机分为三组:右美托咪唑(2.5µg/kg右美托咪唑鼻灌胃并口服淀粉片)、劳拉西泮(生理盐水鼻灌胃并口服劳拉西泮2mg)和安慰剂(生理盐水鼻灌胃并口服淀粉片)。干预在手术前一晚进行。主要结果采用利兹睡眠评估问卷(LSEQ)来评估干预前后睡眠质量的变化。次要结局包括干预当晚的睡眠监测、睡眠满意度评分、干预后2小时内生命体征变化和不良反应发生率。结果:根据LSEQ的睡眠评估,与劳拉西泮组相比,Dex组在入睡难易度(GTS)、醒来难易度(AFS)、清醒后警觉性和行为(BFW)方面均有显著改善(p < 0.05)。两组患者睡眠质量(QOS)差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。睡眠监测显示,右美托咪唑组的中位睡眠发作潜伏期(SOL)为19.0分钟,显著短于劳拉西泮组的33.5分钟和安慰剂组的57.0分钟(p < 0.001)。Dex组总睡眠时间(TST)和睡眠效率(SE)分别为403.7 min和84.5%,与劳拉西泮组(408.6 min, 83.2%)相似(p < 0.05 0.999),优于安慰剂组(278.8 min, 57.4%)(p < 0.001)。两组患者的睡眠满意度评分差异无统计学意义(p < 0.05)。各组间均未报告严重不良反应。结论:芬地酮2.5 μg/kg鼻内和劳拉西泮2 mg口服均可有效改善术前焦虑性失眠患者的睡眠质量。虽然两种治疗方法在维持睡眠方面具有可比性,但在启动睡眠和增强白天功能方面,鼻内服右美托咪定比劳拉西泮更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Drug Design, Development and Therapy
Drug Design, Development and Therapy CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
382
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drug Design, Development and Therapy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal that spans the spectrum of drug design, discovery and development through to clinical applications. The journal is characterized by the rapid reporting of high-quality original research, reviews, expert opinions, commentary and clinical studies in all therapeutic areas. Specific topics covered by the journal include: Drug target identification and validation Phenotypic screening and target deconvolution Biochemical analyses of drug targets and their pathways New methods or relevant applications in molecular/drug design and computer-aided drug discovery* Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of novel biologically active compounds (including diagnostics or chemical probes) Structural or molecular biological studies elucidating molecular recognition processes Fragment-based drug discovery Pharmaceutical/red biotechnology Isolation, structural characterization, (bio)synthesis, bioengineering and pharmacological evaluation of natural products** Distribution, pharmacokinetics and metabolic transformations of drugs or biologically active compounds in drug development Drug delivery and formulation (design and characterization of dosage forms, release mechanisms and in vivo testing) Preclinical development studies Translational animal models Mechanisms of action and signalling pathways Toxicology Gene therapy, cell therapy and immunotherapy Personalized medicine and pharmacogenomics Clinical drug evaluation Patient safety and sustained use of medicines.
期刊最新文献
Lipid Nanovesicles in Cancer Treatment: Improving Targeting and Stability of Antisense Oligonucleotides. NLRP3 Inflammasome Targeting Offers a Novel Therapeutic Paradigm for Sepsis-Induced Myocardial Injury. Population Pharmacokinetic of Epidural Sufentanil in Labouring Women: A Multicentric, Prospective, Observational Study. Determination of the MEC90 of Oxycodone for Preventing Perioperative Shivering in Pregnant Patients Undergoing Caesarean Delivery with Neuraxial Anaesthesia: A Biased-Coin up-and-Down Sequential Allocation Trial. Effects of Ciprofol and Propofol General Anesthesia on Postoperative Recovery Quality in Patients Undergoing Ureteroscopy: A Randomized, Controlled, Double-Blind Clinical Trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1