Surgical interventions for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-12-07 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102999
Jiayidaer Huan, Minghong Yao, Yu Ma, Fan Mei, Yanmei Liu, Lu Ma, Xiaochao Luo, Jiali Liu, Jianguo Xu, Chao You, Hunong Xiang, Kang Zou, Xiao Liang, Xin Hu, Ling Li, Xin Sun
{"title":"Surgical interventions for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.","authors":"Jiayidaer Huan, Minghong Yao, Yu Ma, Fan Mei, Yanmei Liu, Lu Ma, Xiaochao Luo, Jiali Liu, Jianguo Xu, Chao You, Hunong Xiang, Kang Zou, Xiao Liang, Xin Hu, Ling Li, Xin Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Surgical interventions for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) include conventional craniotomy (CC), decompressive craniectomy (DC), and minimally invasive surgery (MIS), with the latter encompassing endoscopic surgery (ES) and minimally invasive puncture surgery (MIPS). However, the superiority of surgery over conservative medical treatment (CMT) and the comparative benefits of different surgical procedures remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various surgical interventions for treating ICH.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to June 16, 2024. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgery (i.e., CC, ES, MIPS, or DC) with CMT or comparing different types of surgeries in patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH. Paired reviewers independently screened citations, assessed the risk of bias of included trials, and extracted data. Primary outcomes were good functional outcome and mortality at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were good functional outcome and mortality at different follow-up times, complications (rebleeding, brain infection, pulmonary infection), and hematoma evacuation rate. The frequentist pairwise and network meta-analysis (NMA) were performed. The GRADE approach was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024518961.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Of the 8573 total records identified by our searches, 31 studies (6448 patients) were eligible for the systematic review and network analysis. Compared with CMT, moderate certainty evidence showed that surgery improved good functional outcome (risk ratio [RR] 1.31, 95% CI 1.13-1.52; risk difference [RD] 9.1%, 95% CI 3.8 to 15.3; <i>I</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup>  = 36%) and reduced mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.95; RD -5.1%, 95% CI -8.2 to -1.4; <i>I</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup>  = 14%). Moderate certainty evidence from NMA suggested that compared with CMT, both ES (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.18-1.93; RD 9.4%, 95% CI 3.3-17.1) and MIPS (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.24-1.76; RD 15.7%, 95% CI 7.9-24.9) improved good functional outcome at 6 months, and both ES (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.85; RD -17.0%, 95% CI -24.0 to -7.5) and CC (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94; RD -6.3%, 95% CI -10.1 to -1.5) reduced mortality at 6 months, whereas MIPS and DC showed a trend, although not statistically significant, towards a reduction in mortality. ES and MIPS also reduced pulmonary infection risk (ES RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.23-0.69; MIPS RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.20-0.60; RD -5.3%, 95% CI -6.6 to -3.3). ES showed higher hematoma evacuation than CC (MD: 7.03, 95% CI: 3.42-10.65; <i>I</i> <sup><i>2</i></sup>  = 94%). No difference in rebleeding or brain infection was found between CC and MIS.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Current moderate certainty evidence suggested that surgical intervention of spontaneous supratentorial ICH, may be associated with improved functional outcomes and a reduced risk of death at 6 months. The advantages of surgical haematoma removal are particularly pronounced when MIS including ES and MIPS are employed. ES could improve functional outcomes, reduce the risk of mortality and pulmonary infection, and have a high hematoma evacuation rate, suggesting that it might be an optimal surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Public Welfare Research Institutes, and 1·3·5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"79 ","pages":"102999"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102999","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Surgical interventions for spontaneous supratentorial intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH) include conventional craniotomy (CC), decompressive craniectomy (DC), and minimally invasive surgery (MIS), with the latter encompassing endoscopic surgery (ES) and minimally invasive puncture surgery (MIPS). However, the superiority of surgery over conservative medical treatment (CMT) and the comparative benefits of different surgical procedures remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of various surgical interventions for treating ICH.

Methods: In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to June 16, 2024. Eligible studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing surgery (i.e., CC, ES, MIPS, or DC) with CMT or comparing different types of surgeries in patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH. Paired reviewers independently screened citations, assessed the risk of bias of included trials, and extracted data. Primary outcomes were good functional outcome and mortality at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were good functional outcome and mortality at different follow-up times, complications (rebleeding, brain infection, pulmonary infection), and hematoma evacuation rate. The frequentist pairwise and network meta-analysis (NMA) were performed. The GRADE approach was used to evaluate the certainty of evidence. This study is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42024518961.

Findings: Of the 8573 total records identified by our searches, 31 studies (6448 patients) were eligible for the systematic review and network analysis. Compared with CMT, moderate certainty evidence showed that surgery improved good functional outcome (risk ratio [RR] 1.31, 95% CI 1.13-1.52; risk difference [RD] 9.1%, 95% CI 3.8 to 15.3; I 2  = 36%) and reduced mortality (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.95; RD -5.1%, 95% CI -8.2 to -1.4; I 2  = 14%). Moderate certainty evidence from NMA suggested that compared with CMT, both ES (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.18-1.93; RD 9.4%, 95% CI 3.3-17.1) and MIPS (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.24-1.76; RD 15.7%, 95% CI 7.9-24.9) improved good functional outcome at 6 months, and both ES (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.85; RD -17.0%, 95% CI -24.0 to -7.5) and CC (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.60-0.94; RD -6.3%, 95% CI -10.1 to -1.5) reduced mortality at 6 months, whereas MIPS and DC showed a trend, although not statistically significant, towards a reduction in mortality. ES and MIPS also reduced pulmonary infection risk (ES RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.23-0.69; MIPS RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.20-0.60; RD -5.3%, 95% CI -6.6 to -3.3). ES showed higher hematoma evacuation than CC (MD: 7.03, 95% CI: 3.42-10.65; I 2  = 94%). No difference in rebleeding or brain infection was found between CC and MIS.

Interpretation: Current moderate certainty evidence suggested that surgical intervention of spontaneous supratentorial ICH, may be associated with improved functional outcomes and a reduced risk of death at 6 months. The advantages of surgical haematoma removal are particularly pronounced when MIS including ES and MIPS are employed. ES could improve functional outcomes, reduce the risk of mortality and pulmonary infection, and have a high hematoma evacuation rate, suggesting that it might be an optimal surgical treatment.

Funding: National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars, Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Public Welfare Research Institutes, and 1·3·5 project for disciplines of excellence, West China Hospital, Sichuan University.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自发性幕上脑出血的手术干预:系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。
背景:自发性幕上脑出血(ICH)的手术干预包括常规开颅术(CC)、减压术(DC)和微创手术(MIS),后者包括内窥镜手术(ES)和微创穿刺手术(MIPS)。然而,手术优于保守医学治疗(CMT)的优势和不同手术方法的比较效益仍不清楚。我们的目的是评估各种手术干预治疗脑出血的有效性和安全性。方法:在本系统综述和网络荟萃分析中,我们检索了PubMed、Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、Embase和ClinicalTrials.gov,检索时间从成立到2024年6月16日。符合条件的研究是比较手术(即CC、ES、MIPS或DC)与CMT或比较自发性幕上脑出血患者不同类型手术的随机对照试验(RCTs)。配对审稿人独立筛选引文,评估纳入试验的偏倚风险,并提取数据。主要结局是良好的功能结局和6个月死亡率。次要结局是良好的功能结局和不同随访时间的死亡率、并发症(再出血、脑感染、肺部感染)和血肿排出率。进行频率配对分析和网络元分析(NMA)。GRADE方法用于评估证据的确定性。本研究已注册为PROSPERO, CRD42024518961。结果:在我们检索到的8573条记录中,31项研究(6448例患者)符合系统评价和网络分析的要求。与CMT相比,中度确定性证据显示手术改善了良好的功能结果(风险比[RR] 1.31, 95% CI 1.13-1.52;风险差异[RD] 9.1%, 95% CI 3.8 ~ 15.3;i2 = 36%)和降低死亡率(RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.71-0.95;RD -5.1%, 95% CI -8.2 ~ -1.4;i2 = 14%)。来自NMA的中等确定性证据表明,与CMT相比,ES (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.18-1.93;RD 9.4%, 95% CI 3.3-17.1)和MIPS (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.24-1.76;RD 15.7%, 95% CI 7.9-24.9)改善了6个月时良好的功能结局,两种ES (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.52-0.85;RD -17.0%, 95%可信区间-24.0到-7.5)和CC(相对危险度0.75,95%可信区间0.60 - -0.94;RD (-6.3%, 95% CI -10.1至-1.5)降低了6个月时的死亡率,而MIPS和DC显示了死亡率降低的趋势,尽管没有统计学意义。ES和MIPS也降低了肺部感染的风险(ES RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.23-0.69;MIPS rr 0.35, 95% ci 0.20-0.60;RD -5.3%, 95% CI -6.6至-3.3)。ES显示血肿排出量高于CC (MD: 7.03, 95% CI: 3.42-10.65;i2 = 94%)。CC和MIS在再出血和脑感染方面没有差异。解释:目前的中等确定性证据表明,自发性幕上脑出血的手术干预可能与改善功能结局和降低6个月死亡风险有关。当使用包括ES和MIPS在内的MIS时,手术血肿去除的优势尤为明显。ES可以改善功能预后,降低死亡和肺部感染的风险,血肿排出率高,提示其可能是最佳的手术治疗方法。资助项目:国家自然科学基金、国家杰出青年科学基金、中央公益性科研院所基本科研业务费、四川大学华西医院1·3·5优秀学科项目。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Global, regional, national burden of asthma from 1990 to 2021, with projections of incidence to 2050: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021. Alcohol use and HIV suppression after completion of financial incentives for alcohol abstinence and isoniazid adherence: a randomized controlled trial. Expression of concern-Effectiveness of strategies for implementing guideline-concordant care in low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. O' testosterone, where is thy sting? A Urologist's reflection on testosterone and prostate cancer. Preoperative and intraoperative neuromonitoring and mapping techniques impact oncological and functional outcomes in supratentorial function-eloquent brain tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1