{"title":"Probing the familial ties between serpin members Kallistatin and PEDF: A comparative analysis review.","authors":"Jingnan Chen, Zihan Wang, Simin Wang, Jiayi Lyu, Zhenzhen Fang, Weiwei Qi, Xia Yang, Guoquan Gao, Ti Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.lfs.2024.123333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The serine protease inhibitors (Serpins) represent a diverse protein superfamily that holds paramount significance in governing vital pathophysiological processes. Their influence on critical biological pathways renders serpins highly coveted targets for drug discovery endeavors. Among the numerous members of this family, two distinct proteins, Kallistatin (encoded by the SERPINA4 gene) and Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor (PEDF, encoded by the SERPINF1 gene), stand out as secreted proteins that are abundantly present in peripheral blood. Kallistatin is a serine protease inhibitor that specifically inhibits human tissue kallikrein, while PEDF is a non-inhibitory member of the serine protease inhibitors superfamily (Lin et al., 2015a; Chao and Chao, 1995 [1,2]). Instead, they exhibit notable anti-angiogenic effects and play pivotal roles in the pathogenesis of metabolic disorders. Extensive research, including our own investigations, has revealed intriguing similarities as well as noteworthy differences between these two proteins. Despite their shared characteristics, the distinctive features of Kallistatin and PEDF render them unique in their respective functions and mechanisms of action. However, a comprehensive literature review comparing their similarities and differences remains elusive. Therefore, the present review aims to systematically delve into and summarize the comparable and contrasting aspects of Kallistatin and PEDF. We will delve into their expression patterns, structural features, and mechanisms of expression regulation. Furthermore, this review will delve into their physiological functions and roles in diseases, the signaling pathways they influence, and their potential clinical applications. By comparing and contrasting these two proteins, we hope to provide a comprehensive understanding of their functions and potential in biomedical research and clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":18122,"journal":{"name":"Life sciences","volume":" ","pages":"123333"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Life sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2024.123333","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The serine protease inhibitors (Serpins) represent a diverse protein superfamily that holds paramount significance in governing vital pathophysiological processes. Their influence on critical biological pathways renders serpins highly coveted targets for drug discovery endeavors. Among the numerous members of this family, two distinct proteins, Kallistatin (encoded by the SERPINA4 gene) and Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor (PEDF, encoded by the SERPINF1 gene), stand out as secreted proteins that are abundantly present in peripheral blood. Kallistatin is a serine protease inhibitor that specifically inhibits human tissue kallikrein, while PEDF is a non-inhibitory member of the serine protease inhibitors superfamily (Lin et al., 2015a; Chao and Chao, 1995 [1,2]). Instead, they exhibit notable anti-angiogenic effects and play pivotal roles in the pathogenesis of metabolic disorders. Extensive research, including our own investigations, has revealed intriguing similarities as well as noteworthy differences between these two proteins. Despite their shared characteristics, the distinctive features of Kallistatin and PEDF render them unique in their respective functions and mechanisms of action. However, a comprehensive literature review comparing their similarities and differences remains elusive. Therefore, the present review aims to systematically delve into and summarize the comparable and contrasting aspects of Kallistatin and PEDF. We will delve into their expression patterns, structural features, and mechanisms of expression regulation. Furthermore, this review will delve into their physiological functions and roles in diseases, the signaling pathways they influence, and their potential clinical applications. By comparing and contrasting these two proteins, we hope to provide a comprehensive understanding of their functions and potential in biomedical research and clinical practice.
丝氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂(Serpins)代表了一个多样化的蛋白质超家族,在控制重要的病理生理过程中具有至关重要的意义。它们对关键生物学途径的影响使蛇蛋白成为药物发现努力的高度垂涎的目标。在这个家族的众多成员中,有两种不同的蛋白,Kallistatin(由SERPINA4基因编码)和色素上皮衍生因子(PEDF,由serpin1基因编码),作为分泌蛋白在外周血中大量存在。Kallistatin是一种丝氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂,特异性抑制人组织kallikrein,而PEDF是丝氨酸蛋白酶抑制剂超家族的非抑制性成员(Lin et al., 2015a;Chao and Chao, 1995[1,2])。相反,它们表现出显著的抗血管生成作用,并在代谢紊乱的发病机制中发挥关键作用。广泛的研究,包括我们自己的调查,揭示了这两种蛋白质之间有趣的相似之处以及值得注意的差异。尽管它们具有共同的特征,但卡利司他汀和PEDF的独特特征使它们在各自的功能和作用机制上是独一无二的。然而,一个全面的文献综述比较他们的异同仍然是难以实现的。因此,本综述旨在系统地探讨和总结卡利司他汀与PEDF的可比性和对比性。深入研究其表达模式、结构特征和表达调控机制。本文将对其在疾病中的生理功能、作用、影响的信号通路及其潜在的临床应用进行综述。通过对这两种蛋白的比较和对比,我们希望对它们在生物医学研究和临床实践中的功能和潜力提供全面的了解。
期刊介绍:
Life Sciences is an international journal publishing articles that emphasize the molecular, cellular, and functional basis of therapy. The journal emphasizes the understanding of mechanism that is relevant to all aspects of human disease and translation to patients. All articles are rigorously reviewed.
The Journal favors publication of full-length papers where modern scientific technologies are used to explain molecular, cellular and physiological mechanisms. Articles that merely report observations are rarely accepted. Recommendations from the Declaration of Helsinki or NIH guidelines for care and use of laboratory animals must be adhered to. Articles should be written at a level accessible to readers who are non-specialists in the topic of the article themselves, but who are interested in the research. The Journal welcomes reviews on topics of wide interest to investigators in the life sciences. We particularly encourage submission of brief, focused reviews containing high-quality artwork and require the use of mechanistic summary diagrams.