Real-world effectiveness and causal mediation study of BNT162b2 on long COVID risks in children and adolescents.

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-12-06 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102962
Qiong Wu, Bingyu Zhang, Jiayi Tong, L Charles Bailey, H Timothy Bunnell, Jiajie Chen, Elizabeth A Chrischilles, Dimitri A Christakis, Stephen M Downs, Kathryn Hirabayashi, Aaron D Mishkin, Abu S M Mosa, Nathan M Pajor, Suchitra Rao, Hanieh Razzaghi, Hayden T Schwenk, Marion R Sills, Huiyuan Wang, Linbo Wang, Yudong Wang, Dazheng Zhang, Ting Zhou, Ravi Jhaveri, Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen, Jeffrey S Morris, Christopher B Forrest, Yong Chen
{"title":"Real-world effectiveness and causal mediation study of BNT162b2 on long COVID risks in children and adolescents.","authors":"Qiong Wu, Bingyu Zhang, Jiayi Tong, L Charles Bailey, H Timothy Bunnell, Jiajie Chen, Elizabeth A Chrischilles, Dimitri A Christakis, Stephen M Downs, Kathryn Hirabayashi, Aaron D Mishkin, Abu S M Mosa, Nathan M Pajor, Suchitra Rao, Hanieh Razzaghi, Hayden T Schwenk, Marion R Sills, Huiyuan Wang, Linbo Wang, Yudong Wang, Dazheng Zhang, Ting Zhou, Ravi Jhaveri, Eric J Tchetgen Tchetgen, Jeffrey S Morris, Christopher B Forrest, Yong Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The impact of pre-infection vaccination on the risk of long COVID remains unclear in the pediatric population. We aim to assess the effectiveness of BNT162b2 on long COVID risks with various strains of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in children and adolescents, using comparative effectiveness methods. We further explore if such pre-infection vaccination can mitigate the risk of long COVID beyond its established protective benefits against SARS-CoV-2 infection using causal mediation analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted real-world vaccine effectiveness study and mediation analysis using data from twenty health systems in the RECOVER PCORnet electronic health record (EHR) Program. Three independent cohorts were constructed including adolescents (12-20 years) during the Delta phase (July 1-November 30, 2021), children (5-11 years) and adolescents (12-20 years) during the Omicron phase (January 1-November 30, 2022). The intervention is first dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine in comparison with no receipt of COVID-19 vaccine. The outcomes of interest include conclusive or probable diagnosis of long COVID following a documented SARS-CoV-2 infection, and body-system-specific condition clusters of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), such as cardiac, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, respiratory, and syndromic categories. The effectiveness was reported as (1-relative risk)∗100 and mediating effects were reported as relative risks.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>112,590 adolescents (88,811 vaccinated) were included in the cohort for the analysis against Delta variant, and 188,894 children (101,277 vaccinated), and 84,735 adolescents (37,724 vaccinated) were included for the analysis against Omicron variant. During the Delta period, the estimated effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine against long COVID among adolescents was 95.4% (95% CI: 90.9%-97.7%). During the Omicron phase, the estimated effectiveness against long COVID among children was 60.2% (95% CI: 40.3%-73.5%) and 75.1% (95% CI: 50.4%-87.5%) among adolescents. The direct effect of vaccination, defined as the effect beyond their impact on SARS-CoV-2 infections, was found to be statistically non-significant in all three study cohorts, with estimated relative risk of 1.08 (95% CI: 0.75-1.55) in the Delta study among adolescents, 1.24 (95% CI: 0.92-1.66) among children and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.69-1.19) among adolescents in the Omicron studies. Meanwhile, the estimated indirect effects, which are effects through protecting SARS-CoV-2 infections, were estimated as 0.04 (95% CI: 0.03-0.05) among adolescents during Delta phase, 0.31 (95% CI: 0.23-0.42) among children and 0.21 (95% CI: 0.16-0.27) among adolescents during the Omicron period.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our study suggests that BNT162b2 was effective in reducing risk of long COVID outcomes in children and adolescents during the Delta and Omicron periods. The mediation analysis indicates the vaccine's effectiveness is primarily derived from its role in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>National Institutes of Health.</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"79 ","pages":"102962"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11667630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102962","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The impact of pre-infection vaccination on the risk of long COVID remains unclear in the pediatric population. We aim to assess the effectiveness of BNT162b2 on long COVID risks with various strains of the SARS-CoV-2 virus in children and adolescents, using comparative effectiveness methods. We further explore if such pre-infection vaccination can mitigate the risk of long COVID beyond its established protective benefits against SARS-CoV-2 infection using causal mediation analysis.

Methods: We conducted real-world vaccine effectiveness study and mediation analysis using data from twenty health systems in the RECOVER PCORnet electronic health record (EHR) Program. Three independent cohorts were constructed including adolescents (12-20 years) during the Delta phase (July 1-November 30, 2021), children (5-11 years) and adolescents (12-20 years) during the Omicron phase (January 1-November 30, 2022). The intervention is first dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine in comparison with no receipt of COVID-19 vaccine. The outcomes of interest include conclusive or probable diagnosis of long COVID following a documented SARS-CoV-2 infection, and body-system-specific condition clusters of post-acute sequelae of SARS-CoV-2 infection (PASC), such as cardiac, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal, respiratory, and syndromic categories. The effectiveness was reported as (1-relative risk)∗100 and mediating effects were reported as relative risks.

Findings: 112,590 adolescents (88,811 vaccinated) were included in the cohort for the analysis against Delta variant, and 188,894 children (101,277 vaccinated), and 84,735 adolescents (37,724 vaccinated) were included for the analysis against Omicron variant. During the Delta period, the estimated effectiveness of the BNT162b2 vaccine against long COVID among adolescents was 95.4% (95% CI: 90.9%-97.7%). During the Omicron phase, the estimated effectiveness against long COVID among children was 60.2% (95% CI: 40.3%-73.5%) and 75.1% (95% CI: 50.4%-87.5%) among adolescents. The direct effect of vaccination, defined as the effect beyond their impact on SARS-CoV-2 infections, was found to be statistically non-significant in all three study cohorts, with estimated relative risk of 1.08 (95% CI: 0.75-1.55) in the Delta study among adolescents, 1.24 (95% CI: 0.92-1.66) among children and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.69-1.19) among adolescents in the Omicron studies. Meanwhile, the estimated indirect effects, which are effects through protecting SARS-CoV-2 infections, were estimated as 0.04 (95% CI: 0.03-0.05) among adolescents during Delta phase, 0.31 (95% CI: 0.23-0.42) among children and 0.21 (95% CI: 0.16-0.27) among adolescents during the Omicron period.

Interpretation: Our study suggests that BNT162b2 was effective in reducing risk of long COVID outcomes in children and adolescents during the Delta and Omicron periods. The mediation analysis indicates the vaccine's effectiveness is primarily derived from its role in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Funding: National Institutes of Health.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BNT162b2对儿童青少年长期COVID风险的现实有效性及因果中介研究
背景:在儿科人群中,感染前接种疫苗对长COVID风险的影响尚不清楚。我们的目的是通过比较有效性的方法,评估BNT162b2对儿童和青少年感染多种SARS-CoV-2病毒株的长期COVID风险的有效性。我们通过因果中介分析进一步探讨这种感染前疫苗接种是否可以降低长期COVID的风险,使其超过对SARS-CoV-2感染的既定保护作用。方法:我们使用RECOVER PCORnet电子健康记录(EHR)项目中20个卫生系统的数据进行了真实世界疫苗有效性研究和中介分析。构建了三个独立队列,包括Delta阶段(2021年7月1日至11月30日)的青少年(12-20岁),Omicron阶段(2022年1月1日至11月30日)的儿童(5-11岁)和青少年(12-20岁)。干预措施是首次接种BNT162b2疫苗,与未接种COVID-19疫苗进行比较。感兴趣的结果包括在记录的SARS-CoV-2感染后进行长时间COVID的结论性或可能的诊断,以及SARS-CoV-2感染急性后后遗症(PASC)的身体系统特异性疾病聚集性,如心脏、胃肠道、肌肉骨骼、呼吸和综合征类别。有效性报告为(1-相对风险)* 100,中介效应报告为相对风险。研究结果:112,590名青少年(88,811名接种者)被纳入了Delta变异分析队列,188,894名儿童(101,277名接种者)和84,735名青少年(37,724名接种者)被纳入了Omicron变异分析队列。在Delta期,BNT162b2疫苗对青少年长冠状病毒的估计有效性为95.4% (95% CI: 90.9%-97.7%)。在Omicron阶段,儿童对长冠状病毒的估计有效性为60.2% (95% CI: 40.3%-73.5%),青少年为75.1% (95% CI: 50.4%-87.5%)。疫苗接种的直接影响,定义为对SARS-CoV-2感染的影响之外的影响,在所有三个研究队列中都发现统计上不显著,Delta研究中青少年的估计相对风险为1.08 (95% CI: 0.75-1.55),儿童的估计相对风险为1.24 (95% CI: 0.92-1.66), Omicron研究中青少年的估计相对风险为0.91 (95% CI: 0.69-1.19)。同时,估计的间接效应,即通过保护SARS-CoV-2感染的效应,在三角洲期青少年中估计为0.04 (95% CI: 0.03-0.05),在儿童中估计为0.31 (95% CI: 0.23-0.42),在欧米克隆期青少年中估计为0.21 (95% CI: 0.16-0.27)。解释:我们的研究表明,BNT162b2可有效降低Delta和Omicron期间儿童和青少年长期COVID结局的风险。中介分析表明,该疫苗的有效性主要来自于其降低SARS-CoV-2感染风险的作用。资助:美国国立卫生研究院。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
期刊最新文献
Global, regional, national burden of asthma from 1990 to 2021, with projections of incidence to 2050: a systematic analysis of the global burden of disease study 2021. Alcohol use and HIV suppression after completion of financial incentives for alcohol abstinence and isoniazid adherence: a randomized controlled trial. Expression of concern-Effectiveness of strategies for implementing guideline-concordant care in low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. O' testosterone, where is thy sting? A Urologist's reflection on testosterone and prostate cancer. Preoperative and intraoperative neuromonitoring and mapping techniques impact oncological and functional outcomes in supratentorial function-eloquent brain tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1