Association of clinical phenotypes of depression with comorbid conditions, treatment patterns and outcomes: a 10-year region-based cohort study.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Translational Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1038/s41398-024-03213-2
Ting Zhu, Di Mu, Yao Hu, Yang Cao, Minlan Yuan, Jia Xu, Heng-Qing Ye, Wei Zhang
{"title":"Association of clinical phenotypes of depression with comorbid conditions, treatment patterns and outcomes: a 10-year region-based cohort study.","authors":"Ting Zhu, Di Mu, Yao Hu, Yang Cao, Minlan Yuan, Jia Xu, Heng-Qing Ye, Wei Zhang","doi":"10.1038/s41398-024-03213-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Depression is a heterogeneous and complex psychological syndrome with highly variable manifestations, which poses difficulties for treatment and prognosis. Depression patients are prone to developing various comorbidities, which stem from different pathophysiological mechanisms, remaining largely understudied. The current study focused on identifying comorbidity-specific phenotypes, and whether these clustered phenotypes are associated with different treatment patterns, clinical manifestations, physiological characteristics, and prognosis. We have conducted a 10-year retrospective observational cohort study using electronic medical records (EMR) for 11,818 patients diagnosed with depression and hospitalized at a large academic medical center in Chengdu, China. K-means clustering and visualization methods were performed to identify phenotypic categories. The association between phenotypic categories and clinical outcomes was evaluated using adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. We classified patients with depression into five stable phenotypic categories, including 15 statistically driven clusters in the discovery cohort (n = 9925) and the validation cohort (n = 1893), respectively. The categories include: (Category A) the lowest incidence of comorbidity, with prominent suicide, psychotic, and somatic symptoms (n = 3493/9925); (Category B) moderate comorbidity rate, with prominent anhedonia and anxious symptoms (n = 1795/9925); (Category C) the highest incidence of comorbidity of endocrine/metabolic and digestive system diseases (n = 1702/9925); (Category D) the highest incidence of comorbidity of neurological, mental and behavioral diseases (n = 881/9925); (Category E) other diseases comorbid with depression (n = 2054/9925). Patients in Category E had the lowest risk of psychiatric rehospitalization within 60-day follow-up, followed by Category C (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.07-2.30), Category B (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.10-2.40), Category A (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.28-2.60), and Category D (HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.59-3.60) with P < 0.05, after adjustment for comorbidities, medications, and age. Regarding other longer observation windows (90-day, 180-day and 365-day), patients in Category D showed the highest rehospitalization risk all the time while there were notable shifts in rankings observed for Categories A, B and C over time. The results indicate that the higher the severity of mental illness in patients with five phenotypic categories, the greater the risk of rehospitalization. These phenotypes are associated with various pathways, including the cardiometabolic system, chronic inflammation, digestive system, neurological system, and mental and behavioral disorders. These pathways play a crucial role in connecting depression with other psychiatric and somatic diseases. The identified phenotypes exhibit notable distinctions in terms of comorbidity patterns, symptomology, biological characteristics, treatment approaches, and clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":23278,"journal":{"name":"Translational Psychiatry","volume":"14 1","pages":"504"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11668879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Translational Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-024-03213-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Depression is a heterogeneous and complex psychological syndrome with highly variable manifestations, which poses difficulties for treatment and prognosis. Depression patients are prone to developing various comorbidities, which stem from different pathophysiological mechanisms, remaining largely understudied. The current study focused on identifying comorbidity-specific phenotypes, and whether these clustered phenotypes are associated with different treatment patterns, clinical manifestations, physiological characteristics, and prognosis. We have conducted a 10-year retrospective observational cohort study using electronic medical records (EMR) for 11,818 patients diagnosed with depression and hospitalized at a large academic medical center in Chengdu, China. K-means clustering and visualization methods were performed to identify phenotypic categories. The association between phenotypic categories and clinical outcomes was evaluated using adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. We classified patients with depression into five stable phenotypic categories, including 15 statistically driven clusters in the discovery cohort (n = 9925) and the validation cohort (n = 1893), respectively. The categories include: (Category A) the lowest incidence of comorbidity, with prominent suicide, psychotic, and somatic symptoms (n = 3493/9925); (Category B) moderate comorbidity rate, with prominent anhedonia and anxious symptoms (n = 1795/9925); (Category C) the highest incidence of comorbidity of endocrine/metabolic and digestive system diseases (n = 1702/9925); (Category D) the highest incidence of comorbidity of neurological, mental and behavioral diseases (n = 881/9925); (Category E) other diseases comorbid with depression (n = 2054/9925). Patients in Category E had the lowest risk of psychiatric rehospitalization within 60-day follow-up, followed by Category C (HR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.07-2.30), Category B (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.10-2.40), Category A (HR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.28-2.60), and Category D (HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.59-3.60) with P < 0.05, after adjustment for comorbidities, medications, and age. Regarding other longer observation windows (90-day, 180-day and 365-day), patients in Category D showed the highest rehospitalization risk all the time while there were notable shifts in rankings observed for Categories A, B and C over time. The results indicate that the higher the severity of mental illness in patients with five phenotypic categories, the greater the risk of rehospitalization. These phenotypes are associated with various pathways, including the cardiometabolic system, chronic inflammation, digestive system, neurological system, and mental and behavioral disorders. These pathways play a crucial role in connecting depression with other psychiatric and somatic diseases. The identified phenotypes exhibit notable distinctions in terms of comorbidity patterns, symptomology, biological characteristics, treatment approaches, and clinical outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抑郁症临床表型与合并症、治疗模式和结果的关联:一项为期10年的区域队列研究
抑郁症是一种异质性复杂的心理综合征,表现形式多变,给治疗和预后带来困难。抑郁症患者容易出现各种合并症,这些合并症源于不同的病理生理机制,目前对这些机制的研究还很不足。目前的研究重点是确定合并症特异性表型,以及这些聚集型表型是否与不同的治疗模式、临床表现、生理特征和预后相关。我们使用电子医疗记录(EMR)对中国成都一家大型学术医疗中心诊断为抑郁症并住院治疗的11,818例患者进行了一项为期10年的回顾性观察队列研究。采用k均值聚类和可视化方法确定表型分类。使用调整后的Cox比例风险模型评估表型类别与临床结果之间的关系。我们将抑郁症患者分为5个稳定的表型类别,其中发现队列(n = 9925)和验证队列(n = 1893)分别包括15个统计驱动的集群。类别包括:(A类)共病发生率最低,有明显的自杀、精神病和躯体症状(n = 3493/9925);(B类)中度合并症,伴明显的快感缺乏和焦虑症状(n = 1795/9925);(C类)内分泌/代谢和消化系统疾病合并症发生率最高(n = 1702/9925);(D类)神经、精神和行为疾病的合并症发生率最高(n = 881/9925);(E类)与抑郁症共病的其他疾病(n = 2054/9925)。E类患者在60天随访期内再住院的风险最低,C类患者次之(HR, 1.57;95% CI, 1.07-2.30), B类(HR, 1.61;95% CI, 1.10-2.40), A类(HR, 1.82;95% CI, 1.28-2.60)和D类(HR, 2.38;95% CI, 1.59-3.60)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
484
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychiatry has suffered tremendously by the limited translational pipeline. Nobel laureate Julius Axelrod''s discovery in 1961 of monoamine reuptake by pre-synaptic neurons still forms the basis of contemporary antidepressant treatment. There is a grievous gap between the explosion of knowledge in neuroscience and conceptually novel treatments for our patients. Translational Psychiatry bridges this gap by fostering and highlighting the pathway from discovery to clinical applications, healthcare and global health. We view translation broadly as the full spectrum of work that marks the pathway from discovery to global health, inclusive. The steps of translation that are within the scope of Translational Psychiatry include (i) fundamental discovery, (ii) bench to bedside, (iii) bedside to clinical applications (clinical trials), (iv) translation to policy and health care guidelines, (v) assessment of health policy and usage, and (vi) global health. All areas of medical research, including — but not restricted to — molecular biology, genetics, pharmacology, imaging and epidemiology are welcome as they contribute to enhance the field of translational psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Brain-wide pleiotropy investigation of alcohol drinking and tobacco smoking behaviors. Distinguishing clinical and genetic risk factors for suicidal ideation and behavior in a diverse hospital population. PSMB4: a potential biomarker and therapeutic target for depression, perspective from integration analysis of depression GWAS data and human plasma proteome. Text mining of outpatient narrative notes to predict the risk of psychiatric hospitalization. Common and disease-specific patterns of functional connectivity and topology alterations across unipolar and bipolar disorder during depressive episodes: a transdiagnostic study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1