Do chromogenic assays of soil enzyme activities need buffers? More disadvantages than advantages of modified universal buffer in the para-nitrophenyl-based assay of phosphomonoesterase and β-glucosidase

IF 9.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 SOIL SCIENCE Soil Biology & Biochemistry Pub Date : 2024-12-28 DOI:10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109704
Chongyang Li, Jordon Wade, Kelly Vollbracht, Diane G. Hooper, Skye A. Wills, Andrew J. Margenot
{"title":"Do chromogenic assays of soil enzyme activities need buffers? More disadvantages than advantages of modified universal buffer in the para-nitrophenyl-based assay of phosphomonoesterase and β-glucosidase","authors":"Chongyang Li, Jordon Wade, Kelly Vollbracht, Diane G. Hooper, Skye A. Wills, Andrew J. Margenot","doi":"10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Buffers are commonly employed in soil enzyme assays to maintain a constant pH during the assay incubation, but soils are already buffered and buffer can alter apparent V<sub>max</sub> and K<sub>m</sub>. To test for potential artifacts of buffer on soil enzyme activities, we selected 32 soils to furnish a broad range of physiochemical characteristics and assayed soil β-glucosidase (BG) and phosphomonoesterase (PME) activities at varied substrate concentrations either in water or in modified universal buffer (MUB). The pH of assays was different (up to 1.6 units) from the measured soil pH (1:2, m/v in water), but MUB did not maintain pH better than water. Compared to water, MUB generally suppressed activities (by∼31%), apparent V<sub>max</sub> (by∼32%) and K<sub>m</sub> (by∼52%) of PME, but yielded similar activities (by∼4% difference) and apparent V<sub>max</sub> (by∼9% difference) for BG. Soils with higher pH tended to have larger degree of suppressed PME actvities in MUB compared to assays in water. Based on the best practice of using a substrate concentration that is 5×K<sub>m</sub> for substrate saturation of the enzyme, the median substrate requirement to assay PME in these 32 soils was ≈ 50 mM g<sup>-1</sup> in water and 25 mM g<sup>-1</sup> in MUB. Regardless of matrix type, the commonly employed PME substrate concentration of 10 mM g<sup>-1</sup> (e.g., Tabatabai, 1994) is insufficient for accurate activity assays. In contrast, for BG assays the commonly used <em>p</em>NP-linked substrate concentration of 10 mM g<sup>-1</sup> appears appropriate for most soils with a median substrate requirement of ∼4 mM g<sup>-1</sup> in water and ∼6 mM g<sup>-1</sup> in MUB. Our results support previous claims that buffers are unnecessary for assaying soil enzyme activities and can alter apparent kinetic parameters (K<sub>m</sub>, V<sub>max</sub>). Potential soil- and enzyme-specific substrate requirements should be determined <em>a priori</em> to ensure accurate measurements of enzyme activities in soils.","PeriodicalId":21888,"journal":{"name":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Soil Biology & Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2024.109704","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Buffers are commonly employed in soil enzyme assays to maintain a constant pH during the assay incubation, but soils are already buffered and buffer can alter apparent Vmax and Km. To test for potential artifacts of buffer on soil enzyme activities, we selected 32 soils to furnish a broad range of physiochemical characteristics and assayed soil β-glucosidase (BG) and phosphomonoesterase (PME) activities at varied substrate concentrations either in water or in modified universal buffer (MUB). The pH of assays was different (up to 1.6 units) from the measured soil pH (1:2, m/v in water), but MUB did not maintain pH better than water. Compared to water, MUB generally suppressed activities (by∼31%), apparent Vmax (by∼32%) and Km (by∼52%) of PME, but yielded similar activities (by∼4% difference) and apparent Vmax (by∼9% difference) for BG. Soils with higher pH tended to have larger degree of suppressed PME actvities in MUB compared to assays in water. Based on the best practice of using a substrate concentration that is 5×Km for substrate saturation of the enzyme, the median substrate requirement to assay PME in these 32 soils was ≈ 50 mM g-1 in water and 25 mM g-1 in MUB. Regardless of matrix type, the commonly employed PME substrate concentration of 10 mM g-1 (e.g., Tabatabai, 1994) is insufficient for accurate activity assays. In contrast, for BG assays the commonly used pNP-linked substrate concentration of 10 mM g-1 appears appropriate for most soils with a median substrate requirement of ∼4 mM g-1 in water and ∼6 mM g-1 in MUB. Our results support previous claims that buffers are unnecessary for assaying soil enzyme activities and can alter apparent kinetic parameters (Km, Vmax). Potential soil- and enzyme-specific substrate requirements should be determined a priori to ensure accurate measurements of enzyme activities in soils.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
土壤酶活性显色分析需要缓冲液吗?改良通用缓冲液在以对硝基苯为基础的磷酸单酯酶和β-葡萄糖苷酶测定中缺点多于优点
缓冲液通常用于土壤酶测定,以在测定孵育期间保持恒定的pH值,但土壤已经被缓冲,缓冲液可以改变表观Vmax和Km。为了测试缓冲液对土壤酶活性的潜在影响,我们选择了32种土壤,提供了广泛的理化特征,并在不同的底物浓度下测定了土壤β-葡萄糖苷酶(BG)和磷酸单酯酶(PME)的活性,这些底物浓度分别是在水中或改性通用缓冲液(MUB)中。测定的pH值与测定的土壤pH值(1:2,m/v在水中)不同(高达1.6个单位),但MUB并不比水更好地维持pH值。与水相比,MUB通常抑制PME的活性(减少~ 31%)、表观Vmax(减少~ 32%)和Km(减少~ 52%),但对BG的活性(减少~ 4%)和表观Vmax(减少~ 9%)相似。与水中相比,pH值较高的土壤中MUB中PME活性的抑制程度较大。根据使用底物浓度5×Km作为酶的底物饱和度的最佳实践,在这32种土壤中测定PME的中位底物要求在水中≈50 mM g-1,在MUB中为25 mM g-1。无论基质类型如何,通常使用的PME底物浓度为10 mM g-1(例如,Tabatabai, 1994)不足以进行准确的活性测定。相比之下,对于BG分析,通常使用的10 mM g-1的pNP-linked底物浓度似乎适用于大多数土壤,水中和MUB中对底物的中值要求分别为~ 4 mM g-1和~ 6 mM g-1。我们的研究结果支持了先前的观点,即缓冲液对于测定土壤酶活性是不必要的,并且可以改变表观动力学参数(Km, Vmax)。潜在的土壤和酶特异性底物要求应事先确定,以确保准确测量土壤中的酶活性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Soil Biology & Biochemistry
Soil Biology & Biochemistry 农林科学-土壤科学
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
9.30%
发文量
312
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Soil Biology & Biochemistry publishes original research articles of international significance focusing on biological processes in soil and their applications to soil and environmental quality. Major topics include the ecology and biochemical processes of soil organisms, their effects on the environment, and interactions with plants. The journal also welcomes state-of-the-art reviews and discussions on contemporary research in soil biology and biochemistry.
期刊最新文献
Experimental Access to Cellulose Oxidation and the Dynamics of Microbial Carbon and Energy Use in Artificial Soil Under Varying Temperature, Water Content, and C/N ratio Distinct seasonal and annual variability of prokaryotes, fungi and protists in cropland soil under different tillage systems and soil texture Root exudates from drought-affected plants increase soil respiration across a range of grassland species A legume-grass cover crop builds mineral-associated organic matter across variable agricultural soils Stability of iron-carbon complexes determines carbon sequestration efficiency in iron-rich soils
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1