Wetter, but not wet enough—Limited greenhouse gas mitigation effects of subsurface irrigation and blocked ditches in an intensively cultivated grassland on fen peat

IF 5.6 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agricultural and Forest Meteorology Pub Date : 2024-12-26 DOI:10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110367
Sebastian Heller , Bärbel Tiemeyer , Willi Oehmke , Peter Gatersleben , Ullrich Dettmann
{"title":"Wetter, but not wet enough—Limited greenhouse gas mitigation effects of subsurface irrigation and blocked ditches in an intensively cultivated grassland on fen peat","authors":"Sebastian Heller ,&nbsp;Bärbel Tiemeyer ,&nbsp;Willi Oehmke ,&nbsp;Peter Gatersleben ,&nbsp;Ullrich Dettmann","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>High-intensity grassland farming on peatlands is a profitable land use option in Western and Central Europe. This highly productive land use requires extensive drainage measures and regular grassland renewal. The drainage practice in particular substantially increases peat mineralisation, resulting in high emissions of the greenhouse gases (GHG) carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) and nitrous oxide (N<sub>2</sub>O). Against this, a controlled raising of the water level (WL) by subsurface irrigation (SI) or ditch blocking (DB) has been proposed as a compromise between reducing the GHG emissions and maintaining grassland use on peatlands. We tested this assumption by measuring the full set of GHGs over four years for three water management systems (SI, DB, ditch drainage as control) in combination with three grassland renewal treatments (direct sowing, shallow ploughing, original sward as control) on an intensively used fen grassland in Northwest Germany.</div><div>The mean annual WL was successfully raised by SI to −0.25 m below the soil surface, while the DB unit remained at a similar level (−0.37 m) as the control (−0.38 m). However, CO<sub>2</sub> emissions were only marginally reduced by SI due to high variability between sites and years. Partially higher CO<sub>2</sub> emissions may have been caused by a higher temperature sensitivity of the heterotrophic respiration at intermediate WLs. Partially lower CO<sub>2</sub> emissions may reflect increased carbon uptake by root growth (<em>Juncus effuses</em>) rather than reduced peat mineralisation. The GHG mitigation potential of the SI system remained negligible in this study, as the small CO<sub>2</sub> reduction was offset by increased CH<sub>4</sub> and N<sub>2</sub>O emissions. The average emissions of the DB system were similar to those of the control unit. Both renewal treatments increased N<sub>2</sub>O emissions for approximately two years. Overall, our study results do not support the use of SI as a GHG mitigation measure for intensively used fen grasslands.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"362 ","pages":"Article 110367"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324004805","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

High-intensity grassland farming on peatlands is a profitable land use option in Western and Central Europe. This highly productive land use requires extensive drainage measures and regular grassland renewal. The drainage practice in particular substantially increases peat mineralisation, resulting in high emissions of the greenhouse gases (GHG) carbon dioxide (CO2) and nitrous oxide (N2O). Against this, a controlled raising of the water level (WL) by subsurface irrigation (SI) or ditch blocking (DB) has been proposed as a compromise between reducing the GHG emissions and maintaining grassland use on peatlands. We tested this assumption by measuring the full set of GHGs over four years for three water management systems (SI, DB, ditch drainage as control) in combination with three grassland renewal treatments (direct sowing, shallow ploughing, original sward as control) on an intensively used fen grassland in Northwest Germany.
The mean annual WL was successfully raised by SI to −0.25 m below the soil surface, while the DB unit remained at a similar level (−0.37 m) as the control (−0.38 m). However, CO2 emissions were only marginally reduced by SI due to high variability between sites and years. Partially higher CO2 emissions may have been caused by a higher temperature sensitivity of the heterotrophic respiration at intermediate WLs. Partially lower CO2 emissions may reflect increased carbon uptake by root growth (Juncus effuses) rather than reduced peat mineralisation. The GHG mitigation potential of the SI system remained negligible in this study, as the small CO2 reduction was offset by increased CH4 and N2O emissions. The average emissions of the DB system were similar to those of the control unit. Both renewal treatments increased N2O emissions for approximately two years. Overall, our study results do not support the use of SI as a GHG mitigation measure for intensively used fen grasslands.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
湿润,但不够湿润:在集约化草地上,地下灌溉和阻塞沟渠对泥炭沼泽的温室气体减排效果有限
在西欧和中欧,泥炭地的高强度草地耕作是一种有利可图的土地利用选择。这种高产的土地利用需要广泛的排水措施和定期的草地更新。特别是排水做法大大增加了泥炭矿化,导致温室气体(GHG)二氧化碳(CO2)和一氧化二氮(N2O)的大量排放。为此,提出了通过地下灌溉(SI)或沟渠阻塞(DB)来控制水位(WL)的方法,作为减少温室气体排放和维持泥炭地草地利用之间的折衷方案。我们在德国西北部一个集约利用的沼泽草原上测量了三种水管理系统(SI、DB、沟渠排水作为对照)以及三种草地更新处理(直接播种、浅耕、原始草地作为对照)四年来的全部温室气体排放量,以此验证了这一假设。SI成功地将年平均WL提高到土壤表面以下- 0.25 m,而DB单元保持在与对照(- 0.38 m)相似的水平(- 0.37 m),但由于站点和年份之间的高变异性,SI仅能轻微减少CO2排放。在一定程度上,较高的CO2排放量可能是由于异养呼吸在中间wl的温度敏感性较高造成的。部分降低的二氧化碳排放可能反映了根系生长增加的碳吸收,而不是减少的泥炭矿化。在本研究中,SI系统的温室气体减缓潜力仍然可以忽略不计,因为少量的CO2减少被增加的CH4和N2O排放所抵消。DB系统的平均排放量与控制单元相似。两种更新处理在大约两年内都增加了N2O排放量。总体而言,我们的研究结果不支持将SI作为集约利用的沼泽草原的温室气体缓解措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
期刊最新文献
Deep percolation and soil water dynamics under different sand-fixing vegetation types in two different precipitation regions in semiarid sandy Land, Northern China Evaluating the sensitivity of vegetation indices to leaf area index variability at individual tree level using multispectral drone acquisitions Global vegetation vulnerability to drought is underestimated due to the lagged effect Rice yield stability and its determinants across different rice-cropping systems in China Robust filling of extra-long gaps in eddy covariance CO2 flux measurements from a temperate deciduous forest using eXtreme Gradient Boosting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1