Evaluating the Accuracy of Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Hybrid Algorithms for Flood Routing Calculations

IF 1.9 4区 地球科学 Q2 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS pure and applied geophysics Pub Date : 2024-10-26 DOI:10.1007/s00024-024-03575-0
Metin Sarıgöl
{"title":"Evaluating the Accuracy of Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Hybrid Algorithms for Flood Routing Calculations","authors":"Metin Sarıgöl","doi":"10.1007/s00024-024-03575-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The increase in average temperatures in the last century has caused global warming, which has increased the frequency of natural disasters. Floods are one of the most important natural disasters and harm the environment and especially human life. Flood routing techniques also play an important role in predicting floods. For this reason, the accuracy and precision of flood routing calculations are of vital importance in taking all necessary precautions before the floods reach the region and in preventing loss of life. This study aims to compare the performance of machine learning, deep learning and hybrid algorithms for flood routing prediction models in the Büyük Menderes River. In this research deep learning model Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM), machine learning model Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and hybrid machine learning models empirical mode decomposition (EMD)-ANN, and particle swarm optimization (PSO)-ANN algorithms were compared to forecast the flood routing results in two discharge observation stations in the Büyük Menderes river. The analysis results of the established ML algorithms were compared with statistical criteria such as mean error, mean absolute error, root mean square error and coefficient of determination. Additionally, Taylor diagrams, box plots, and beeswarm plot visual graphs were also used in this comparison analysis. At the end of the research, it was determined that the hybrid algorithm PSO-ANN was the most successful algorithm in forecasting flood routing results among other models according to the error values of MAE: 0.2514, MSE: 0.4613, RMSE: 0.6791, NSE: 0.941 and MBE: 0.047. Moreover, the LSTM algorithm was the approach with second estimation accuracy. The findings are vital in terms of taking necessary precautions and gaining time before floods reach any region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":21078,"journal":{"name":"pure and applied geophysics","volume":"181 12","pages":"3485 - 3506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"pure and applied geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00024-024-03575-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The increase in average temperatures in the last century has caused global warming, which has increased the frequency of natural disasters. Floods are one of the most important natural disasters and harm the environment and especially human life. Flood routing techniques also play an important role in predicting floods. For this reason, the accuracy and precision of flood routing calculations are of vital importance in taking all necessary precautions before the floods reach the region and in preventing loss of life. This study aims to compare the performance of machine learning, deep learning and hybrid algorithms for flood routing prediction models in the Büyük Menderes River. In this research deep learning model Long-Short Term Memory (LSTM), machine learning model Artificial Neural Network (ANN), and hybrid machine learning models empirical mode decomposition (EMD)-ANN, and particle swarm optimization (PSO)-ANN algorithms were compared to forecast the flood routing results in two discharge observation stations in the Büyük Menderes river. The analysis results of the established ML algorithms were compared with statistical criteria such as mean error, mean absolute error, root mean square error and coefficient of determination. Additionally, Taylor diagrams, box plots, and beeswarm plot visual graphs were also used in this comparison analysis. At the end of the research, it was determined that the hybrid algorithm PSO-ANN was the most successful algorithm in forecasting flood routing results among other models according to the error values of MAE: 0.2514, MSE: 0.4613, RMSE: 0.6791, NSE: 0.941 and MBE: 0.047. Moreover, the LSTM algorithm was the approach with second estimation accuracy. The findings are vital in terms of taking necessary precautions and gaining time before floods reach any region.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估洪水路由计算中机器学习、深度学习和混合算法的准确性
平均气温的增加在上个世纪已经引起了全球变暖,这增加了自然灾害的频率。洪水是最重要的自然灾害之一,对环境尤其是人类生命造成严重危害。洪水路由技术在洪水预测中也起着重要作用。因此,洪水路线计算的准确性和精度对于在洪水到达该地区之前采取一切必要的预防措施和防止生命损失至关重要。本研究旨在比较机器学习、深度学习和混合算法在b yy k Menderes河洪水路径预测模型中的性能。采用深度学习模型长短期记忆(LSTM)、机器学习模型人工神经网络(ANN)、混合机器学习模型经验模态分解(EMD)-人工神经网络(ANN)和粒子群优化(PSO)-人工神经网络(ANN)算法对b yy k Menderes河两个流量观测站的洪水路径进行预测。将所建立的ML算法的分析结果与平均误差、平均绝对误差、均方根误差和决定系数等统计标准进行比较。此外,泰勒图、箱形图和蜂群图可视化图也用于比较分析。在研究结束时,根据误差值MAE: 0.2514, MSE: 0.4613, RMSE: 0.6791, NSE: 0.941, MBE: 0.047,确定混合算法PSO-ANN是预测洪水路由结果最成功的算法。此外,LSTM算法是具有二次估计精度的方法。这些发现对于采取必要的预防措施和在洪水到达任何地区之前争取时间至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
pure and applied geophysics
pure and applied geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
240
审稿时长
9.8 months
期刊介绍: pure and applied geophysics (pageoph), a continuation of the journal "Geofisica pura e applicata", publishes original scientific contributions in the fields of solid Earth, atmospheric and oceanic sciences. Regular and special issues feature thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and state-of-the-art surveys. Long running journal, founded in 1939 as Geofisica pura e applicata Publishes peer-reviewed original scientific contributions and state-of-the-art surveys in solid earth and atmospheric sciences Features thought-provoking reports on active areas of current research and is a major source for publications on tsunami research Coverage extends to research topics in oceanic sciences See Instructions for Authors on the right hand side.
期刊最新文献
Nuclear Explosion Monitoring and Verification: Science and Technology to Tackle Global Challenges: An Introduction Overview of Remote Atmospheric Radionuclide Monitoring Data Associated with Historic Nuclear Explosions Decay Corrections in Isotopic Ratio Estimation for Short-Lived CTBT-Relevant Radionuclides Based on Activity Concentration Profiles During Sampling Radioxenon from Spontaneous Fission Released by Spent Nuclear Fuel Reprocessing Facilities and Its Possible Impact on International Monitoring System Observations Observation and Modeling of the Gravity Signals of the January 15, 2022 Hunga-Tonga Air Wave \(A_1\) at Two Stations Near Strasbourg, France
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1