Edge Artificial Intelligence Device in Real-Time Endoscopy for Classification of Gastric Neoplasms: Development and Validation Study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Biomimetics Pub Date : 2024-12-22 DOI:10.3390/biomimetics9120783
Eun Jeong Gong, Chang Seok Bang, Jae Jun Lee
{"title":"Edge Artificial Intelligence Device in Real-Time Endoscopy for Classification of Gastric Neoplasms: Development and Validation Study.","authors":"Eun Jeong Gong, Chang Seok Bang, Jae Jun Lee","doi":"10.3390/biomimetics9120783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We previously developed artificial intelligence (AI) diagnosis algorithms for predicting the six classes of stomach lesions. However, this required significant computational resources. The incorporation of AI into medical devices has evolved from centralized models to decentralized edge computing devices. In this study, a deep learning endoscopic image classification model was created to automatically categorize all phases of gastric carcinogenesis using an edge computing device.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A total of 15,910 endoscopic images were collected retrospectively and randomly assigned to train, validation, and internal-test datasets in an 8:1:1 ratio. The major outcomes were as follows: 1. lesion classification accuracy in six categories: normal/atrophy/intestinal metaplasia/dysplasia/early/advanced gastric cancer; and 2. the prospective evaluation of classification accuracy in real-world procedures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The internal-test lesion-classification accuracy was 93.8% (95% confidence interval: 93.4-94.2%); precision was 88.6%, recall was 88.3%, and F1 score was 88.4%. For the prospective performance test, the established model attained an accuracy of 93.3% (91.5-95.1%). The established model's lesion classification inference speed was 2-3 ms on GPU and 5-6 ms on CPU. The expert endoscopists reported no delays in lesion classification or any interference from the deep learning model throughout their exams.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We established a deep learning endoscopic image classification model to automatically classify all stages of gastric carcinogenesis using an edge computing device.</p>","PeriodicalId":8907,"journal":{"name":"Biomimetics","volume":"9 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11672907/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomimetics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomimetics9120783","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We previously developed artificial intelligence (AI) diagnosis algorithms for predicting the six classes of stomach lesions. However, this required significant computational resources. The incorporation of AI into medical devices has evolved from centralized models to decentralized edge computing devices. In this study, a deep learning endoscopic image classification model was created to automatically categorize all phases of gastric carcinogenesis using an edge computing device.

Design: A total of 15,910 endoscopic images were collected retrospectively and randomly assigned to train, validation, and internal-test datasets in an 8:1:1 ratio. The major outcomes were as follows: 1. lesion classification accuracy in six categories: normal/atrophy/intestinal metaplasia/dysplasia/early/advanced gastric cancer; and 2. the prospective evaluation of classification accuracy in real-world procedures.

Results: The internal-test lesion-classification accuracy was 93.8% (95% confidence interval: 93.4-94.2%); precision was 88.6%, recall was 88.3%, and F1 score was 88.4%. For the prospective performance test, the established model attained an accuracy of 93.3% (91.5-95.1%). The established model's lesion classification inference speed was 2-3 ms on GPU and 5-6 ms on CPU. The expert endoscopists reported no delays in lesion classification or any interference from the deep learning model throughout their exams.

Conclusions: We established a deep learning endoscopic image classification model to automatically classify all stages of gastric carcinogenesis using an edge computing device.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边缘人工智能设备用于胃肿瘤实时内镜分类:开发和验证研究。
目的:我们之前开发了人工智能(AI)诊断算法来预测六类胃病变。然而,这需要大量的计算资源。将人工智能纳入医疗设备已经从集中式模型发展到分散的边缘计算设备。本研究建立了一个深度学习内镜图像分类模型,利用边缘计算设备对胃癌发生的各个阶段进行自动分类。设计:回顾性收集共15910张内镜图像,并按8:1:1的比例随机分配到训练、验证和内测数据集。主要结果如下:1。正常/萎缩/肠化生/异常增生/早期/晚期胃癌6类病变分类准确率;和2。现实世界程序中分类精度的前瞻性评价。结果:内测病变分类准确率为93.8%(95%置信区间:93.4 ~ 94.2%);准确率为88.6%,召回率为88.3%,F1评分为88.4%。对于前瞻性性能测试,所建立的模型的准确率为93.3%(91.5-95.1%)。所建立模型的病灶分类推理速度在GPU上为2-3 ms,在CPU上为5-6 ms。内窥镜专家报告说,在整个检查过程中,病变分类没有延迟,也没有受到深度学习模型的干扰。结论:我们建立了一个深度学习内镜图像分类模型,利用边缘计算设备对胃癌发生的各个阶段进行自动分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomimetics
Biomimetics Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
189
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Internal and Marginal Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of Laminates Using DLP Printing and Milling Methods. Bone Marrow Stromal Cells Generate a Pro-Healing Inflammasome When Cultured on Titanium-Aluminum-Vanadium Surfaces with Microscale/Nanoscale Structural Features. Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Repair with Suture Tape Augmentation Can Yield Good Midterm Clinical Outcomes Regardless of Skeletal Maturity and Joint Laxity. Segment, Compare, and Learn: Creating Movement Libraries of Complex Task for Learning from Demonstration. Bionic Modeling Study on the Landing Mechanism of Flapping Wing Robot Based on the Thoracic Legs of Purple Stem Beetle, Sagra femorata.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1