Different association of HDL-C, apoA-I, and HDL-C/apoA-I with multiple outcomes in HFrEF patients

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS International journal of cardiology Pub Date : 2024-12-24 DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132929
Ayiguli Abudukeremu , Qiaofei Chen , Zhanpeng Pan , Xiao Liu , Tongsheng Huang , Yuan Jiang , Hongwei Li , Runlu Sun , Hong Pan , Kexin Wen , Yue Wang , Minglong Zheng , Zizhuo Su , Yuling Zhang
{"title":"Different association of HDL-C, apoA-I, and HDL-C/apoA-I with multiple outcomes in HFrEF patients","authors":"Ayiguli Abudukeremu ,&nbsp;Qiaofei Chen ,&nbsp;Zhanpeng Pan ,&nbsp;Xiao Liu ,&nbsp;Tongsheng Huang ,&nbsp;Yuan Jiang ,&nbsp;Hongwei Li ,&nbsp;Runlu Sun ,&nbsp;Hong Pan ,&nbsp;Kexin Wen ,&nbsp;Yue Wang ,&nbsp;Minglong Zheng ,&nbsp;Zizhuo Su ,&nbsp;Yuling Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2024.132929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) has been considered a cardioprotective factor for several decades. However, its association with outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the association of HDL-C, apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I), and the HDL-C/apoA-I ratio with multiple outcomes of HFrEF patients and establish prognostic models using machine learning methods.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and results</h3><div>This was a retrospective, single-center study. The associations between lipid levels and multiple outcomes were examined using logistic regression analysis. Prognostic models for multiple outcomes were further established using four machine learning methods. A total of 352 HFrEF patients were visited successfully. In the multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analysis, HDL-C did not show a significant association with any of the studied outcomes; apoA-I was marginally unassociated with all-cause rehospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.62, <em>p</em> = 0.063) but was significantly negatively associated with all-cause death (aOR = 0.53, <em>p</em> = 0.038), rehospitalization for cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease (aOR = 0.43, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001), and rehospitalization for heart failure (aOR = 0.55, <em>p</em> = 0.024); apoA-I was also significantly positively associated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement (aOR = 2.00, <em>p</em> = 0.039). Although several <em>p</em>-values were not statistically significant, both the first and third HDL-C/apoA-I groups showed an increased incidence rate for all adverse outcomes compared with the middle group and a decreased incidence rate for LVEF improvement. In the machine learning analysis, the support vector machine and extreme gradient boosting models demonstrated better predictive performance. For each outcome prognosis, apoA-I and logarithmic N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide were automatically selected.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Among HFrEF patients, apoA-I may be a better marker for predicting outcomes than HDL-C. Both low and high levels of HDL-C/apoA-I may indicate a poor prognosis of HFrEF patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"422 ","pages":"Article 132929"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527324015511","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

High-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C) has been considered a cardioprotective factor for several decades. However, its association with outcomes in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) remains controversial. We aimed to investigate the association of HDL-C, apolipoprotein A-I (apoA-I), and the HDL-C/apoA-I ratio with multiple outcomes of HFrEF patients and establish prognostic models using machine learning methods.

Methods and results

This was a retrospective, single-center study. The associations between lipid levels and multiple outcomes were examined using logistic regression analysis. Prognostic models for multiple outcomes were further established using four machine learning methods. A total of 352 HFrEF patients were visited successfully. In the multivariable-adjusted logistic regression analysis, HDL-C did not show a significant association with any of the studied outcomes; apoA-I was marginally unassociated with all-cause rehospitalization (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.62, p = 0.063) but was significantly negatively associated with all-cause death (aOR = 0.53, p = 0.038), rehospitalization for cardiovascular or cerebrovascular disease (aOR = 0.43, p < 0.001), and rehospitalization for heart failure (aOR = 0.55, p = 0.024); apoA-I was also significantly positively associated with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) improvement (aOR = 2.00, p = 0.039). Although several p-values were not statistically significant, both the first and third HDL-C/apoA-I groups showed an increased incidence rate for all adverse outcomes compared with the middle group and a decreased incidence rate for LVEF improvement. In the machine learning analysis, the support vector machine and extreme gradient boosting models demonstrated better predictive performance. For each outcome prognosis, apoA-I and logarithmic N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide were automatically selected.

Conclusion

Among HFrEF patients, apoA-I may be a better marker for predicting outcomes than HDL-C. Both low and high levels of HDL-C/apoA-I may indicate a poor prognosis of HFrEF patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
HDLC、apoA-I和HDL-C/apoA-I与HFrEF患者多种结局的不同关联
背景:高密度脂蛋白-胆固醇(HDLC)几十年来一直被认为是一种心脏保护因子。然而,其与心力衰竭伴射血分数降低(HFrEF)患者预后的关系仍存在争议。我们旨在研究HDLC、载脂蛋白A-I (apoA-I)和HDL-C/apoA-I比值与HFrEF患者多种预后的关系,并使用机器学习方法建立预后模型。方法和结果:这是一项回顾性、单中心研究。脂质水平与多种结果之间的关系采用logistic回归分析进行检验。使用四种机器学习方法进一步建立了多种结果的预测模型。共成功访问了352例HFrEF患者。在多变量调整logistic回归分析中,HDL-C与任何研究结果均无显著相关性;apoA-I略与全因再入院治疗无关(调整优势比(aOR) = 0.62,p = 0.063),但与全因死亡显著负相关(aOR = 0.53,p = 0.038),再进医院心血管或脑血管疾病(aOR = 0.43,p 结论:HFrEF患者,apoA-I可能是一个更好的预测结果比为标志。低水平和高水平的HDL-C/ apoa - 1可能表明HFrEF患者预后不良。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Right ventricular-pulmonary artery coupling assessed by two-dimensional strain predicts in-hospital complications in Takotsubo syndrome Trends in mechanical circulatory support utilization, left ventricular assist device implantation and transplant during cardiogenic shock hospitalizations, after the new heart allocation policy. Apical ballooning and the rogue clot: A risky affair in Takotsubo syndrome. Colchicine for secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1