Colchicine for secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS International journal of cardiology Pub Date : 2025-02-07 DOI:10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133045
Safia Shaikh , Mohammad Hamza , Sivaram Neppala , Sahib Singh , Prakash Upreti , Ahmed Muaaz Umer , K.C. Manish , Krutarth Pandya , Yasemin Bahar , Yasar Sattar , M. Chadi Alraies
{"title":"Colchicine for secondary prevention in patients with acute coronary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Safia Shaikh ,&nbsp;Mohammad Hamza ,&nbsp;Sivaram Neppala ,&nbsp;Sahib Singh ,&nbsp;Prakash Upreti ,&nbsp;Ahmed Muaaz Umer ,&nbsp;K.C. Manish ,&nbsp;Krutarth Pandya ,&nbsp;Yasemin Bahar ,&nbsp;Yasar Sattar ,&nbsp;M. Chadi Alraies","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcard.2025.133045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Despite optimal therapy, coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a significant public health concern worldwide. Studies have increasingly recognized the role of inflammation in atherosclerosis. Colchicine, a potent anti-inflammatory drug commonly used to treat gout, and pericarditis is being evaluated in this study for its safety and efficacy in preventing CAD following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched PubMed and Embase for studies up to April 2024 comparing colchicine to standard medical treatment in ACS patients. Primary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and recurrent ACS, while secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, congestive heart failure (CHF), stroke, hospitalizations, and gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We included nine studies with a pooled sample size of 7260 patients. The mean age was 60.1 (±11.8) years, with 19.3 % females and a mean follow-up duration of 8.5 (±6) months. Patients who received colchicine treatment demonstrated a reduced risk of re-hospitalizations (OR 0.52 [0.34–0.81]) but had increased GI effects (OR 2.10 [1.20–3.68]). There was no significant difference in cardiovascular death (OR 1.17 [0.52–2.63]), MACE (OR 0.68 [0.45–1.01]), stroke (OR 0.46 [0.18–1.18]), recurrent ACS (OR 0.55 [0.28–1.09]) and the incidence of CHF (OR 0.90 [0.38–2.12]) between patients treated with colchicine versus standard medical treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Adding colchicine to standard medical therapy in ACS patients significantly reduced hospitalizations but is associated with increased GI side effects. Further prospective trials are required to validate these findings and determine if early intervention with colchicine treatment improves clinical outcomes in ACS patients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13710,"journal":{"name":"International journal of cardiology","volume":"425 ","pages":"Article 133045"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167527325000889","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Despite optimal therapy, coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a significant public health concern worldwide. Studies have increasingly recognized the role of inflammation in atherosclerosis. Colchicine, a potent anti-inflammatory drug commonly used to treat gout, and pericarditis is being evaluated in this study for its safety and efficacy in preventing CAD following an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Methods

We searched PubMed and Embase for studies up to April 2024 comparing colchicine to standard medical treatment in ACS patients. Primary outcomes included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and recurrent ACS, while secondary outcomes were cardiovascular death, congestive heart failure (CHF), stroke, hospitalizations, and gastrointestinal (GI) side effects. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

Results

We included nine studies with a pooled sample size of 7260 patients. The mean age was 60.1 (±11.8) years, with 19.3 % females and a mean follow-up duration of 8.5 (±6) months. Patients who received colchicine treatment demonstrated a reduced risk of re-hospitalizations (OR 0.52 [0.34–0.81]) but had increased GI effects (OR 2.10 [1.20–3.68]). There was no significant difference in cardiovascular death (OR 1.17 [0.52–2.63]), MACE (OR 0.68 [0.45–1.01]), stroke (OR 0.46 [0.18–1.18]), recurrent ACS (OR 0.55 [0.28–1.09]) and the incidence of CHF (OR 0.90 [0.38–2.12]) between patients treated with colchicine versus standard medical treatment.

Conclusion

Adding colchicine to standard medical therapy in ACS patients significantly reduced hospitalizations but is associated with increased GI side effects. Further prospective trials are required to validate these findings and determine if early intervention with colchicine treatment improves clinical outcomes in ACS patients.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
秋水仙碱对急性冠脉综合征患者的二级预防作用:一项系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:尽管有最佳的治疗方法,冠状动脉疾病(CAD)仍然是世界范围内一个重要的公共卫生问题。研究越来越认识到炎症在动脉粥样硬化中的作用。秋水秋碱是一种有效的抗炎药物,通常用于治疗痛风和心包炎,本研究正在评估其预防急性冠脉综合征(ACS)后CAD的安全性和有效性。方法:我们检索PubMed和Embase截至2024年4月比较秋水仙碱与ACS患者标准药物治疗的研究。主要结局包括主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和复发性ACS,次要结局包括心血管死亡、充血性心力衰竭(CHF)、中风、住院和胃肠道(GI)副作用。数据采用随机效应模型汇总。结果:我们纳入了9项研究,共纳入7260例患者。平均年龄60.1(±11.8)岁,女性19.3% %,平均随访时间8.5(±6)个月。接受秋水仙碱治疗的患者再次住院的风险降低(OR为0.52[0.34-0.81]),但胃肠道影响增加(OR为2.10[1.20-3.68])。在心血管死亡(OR 1.17[0.52-2.63])、MACE (OR 0.68[0.45-1.01])、卒中(OR 0.46[0.18-1.18])、ACS复发(OR 0.55[0.28-1.09])和CHF发生率(OR 0.90[0.38-2.12])方面,秋水仙碱治疗组与标准药物治疗组之间无显著差异。结论:在ACS患者的标准药物治疗中加入秋水仙碱可显著降低住院率,但与胃肠道副作用增加相关。需要进一步的前瞻性试验来验证这些发现,并确定秋水仙碱治疗的早期干预是否能改善ACS患者的临床结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of cardiology
International journal of cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
5.70%
发文量
758
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cardiology is devoted to cardiology in the broadest sense. Both basic research and clinical papers can be submitted. The journal serves the interest of both practicing clinicians and researchers. In addition to original papers, we are launching a range of new manuscript types, including Consensus and Position Papers, Systematic Reviews, Meta-analyses, and Short communications. Case reports are no longer acceptable. Controversial techniques, issues on health policy and social medicine are discussed and serve as useful tools for encouraging debate.
期刊最新文献
The outcome of patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation by body mass index. Inflammatory cardiomyopathy: Position paper of the Italian Society of Cardiology Working Group on cardiomyopathies and pericardial diseases in collaboration with the Italian Society of Cardiology Working Group on cardiac magnetic resonance. Diastolic dysfunction assessed by the 2025 American Society of Echocardiography guidelines and survival following myocardial infarction. Bail-out stenting and target-vessel failure after drug-coated balloon percutaneous coronary angioplasty for de novo lesions: The BOSS study. Determinants of changes in peak oxygen consumption in patients with new-onset heart failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1