There are limited objective methods when it comes to identifying and diagnosing concussion. Pupil assessment is performed routinely as a standard-of-care following traumatic brain injury (TBI). Unlike the highly subjective and limited reliability of pupil assessment using penlights and flashlights, Quantitative pupillometry (QP) is an established, valid, and reliable method of pupillary assessment. This study aims to investigate the use of QP values in concussion evaluation.
Of 162 subjects, 88 were female (54.3%), with a mean age of 15.8 (SD=6.9) years. Most (49.4%) occurrences were sport-related injuries. The mean time since injury was 21 (SD=28.6) days. The mean SCAT5 PCSS score was 37.3 (SD=25.6). A significant difference within average and maximum constriction velocities (p=.041 and 0.034, respectively) was found between subjects seen early (<2weeks) versus late (>2weeks) after injury. Pupillometry values were statistically different across SCAT5 PCSS tertiles for anisocoria after light exposure (p=.046).
Conclusions
This exploratory study is among the first to show that certain QP values — latency of constriction, constriction velocity, and average dilation velocity — may be useful in providing objective metrics when evaluating more symptomatic concussion.
期刊介绍:
This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology.
The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.