Effect of tranexamic acid on rebleeding, mortality, and hydrocephalus in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-03-20 DOI:10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111189
Mohammed Maan Al-Salihi, Ahmed Abd Elazim, Maryam Sabah Al-Jebur, Ram Saha, Farhan Siddiq, Ali Ayyad, Adnan I Qureshi
{"title":"Effect of tranexamic acid on rebleeding, mortality, and hydrocephalus in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Mohammed Maan Al-Salihi, Ahmed Abd Elazim, Maryam Sabah Al-Jebur, Ram Saha, Farhan Siddiq, Ali Ayyad, Adnan I Qureshi","doi":"10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The therapeutic benefit of tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remains controversial. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of TXA in aSAH patients by performing a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing TXA with either placebo or standard care in aSAH patients. A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception to July 2024. Outcomes of interest included rebleeding, mortality, functional outcomes, and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Subgroup analyses were performed based on publication date and TXA administration duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirteen RCTs were included in our study. TXA significantly reduced rebleeding rates (relative risk [RR] 0.61; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.74, P < 0.00001) but did not affect mortality (RR 0.99; 95 % CI 0.86-1.13, P = 0.84) or good clinical outcomes (RR 0.98; 95 % CI 0.93-1.05, P = 0.63). TXA use was associated with increased occurrence of hydrocephalus (RR 1.12; 95 % CI 1.01-1.23, P = 0.03) but not DCI (RR 1.00; 95 % CI 0.84-1.20, P = 0.96). Subgroup analyses suggested greater rebleeding reduction with longer TXA administration (≥1 week) and in more recent studies (post-2000).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TXA reduces rebleeding in aSAH but does not improve survival or functional outcomes. Its routine use in aSAH is not supported by current evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":15487,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","volume":"135 ","pages":"111189"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2025.111189","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The therapeutic benefit of tranexamic acid (TXA) in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) remains controversial. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of TXA in aSAH patients by performing a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs).

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs comparing TXA with either placebo or standard care in aSAH patients. A comprehensive literature search was performed across PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus from inception to July 2024. Outcomes of interest included rebleeding, mortality, functional outcomes, and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI). Subgroup analyses were performed based on publication date and TXA administration duration.

Results: Thirteen RCTs were included in our study. TXA significantly reduced rebleeding rates (relative risk [RR] 0.61; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.74, P < 0.00001) but did not affect mortality (RR 0.99; 95 % CI 0.86-1.13, P = 0.84) or good clinical outcomes (RR 0.98; 95 % CI 0.93-1.05, P = 0.63). TXA use was associated with increased occurrence of hydrocephalus (RR 1.12; 95 % CI 1.01-1.23, P = 0.03) but not DCI (RR 1.00; 95 % CI 0.84-1.20, P = 0.96). Subgroup analyses suggested greater rebleeding reduction with longer TXA administration (≥1 week) and in more recent studies (post-2000).

Conclusions: TXA reduces rebleeding in aSAH but does not improve survival or functional outcomes. Its routine use in aSAH is not supported by current evidence.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
氨甲环酸对动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血患者再出血、死亡率和脑积水的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience
Journal of Clinical Neuroscience 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
402
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: This International journal, Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, publishes articles on clinical neurosurgery and neurology and the related neurosciences such as neuro-pathology, neuro-radiology, neuro-ophthalmology and neuro-physiology. The journal has a broad International perspective, and emphasises the advances occurring in Asia, the Pacific Rim region, Europe and North America. The Journal acts as a focus for publication of major clinical and laboratory research, as well as publishing solicited manuscripts on specific subjects from experts, case reports and other information of interest to clinicians working in the clinical neurosciences.
期刊最新文献
Associations between white matter hyperintensities and physical activity: A sectional study in UK Biobank participants. Effect of tranexamic acid on rebleeding, mortality, and hydrocephalus in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Artificial intelligence in academic writing: Enhancing or replacing human expertise? From biomarkers to brain imaging: Refining early diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. Flow diverter is valid for aneurysms with incorporated branch vessels: Adding coil embolization and incorporated branch vessel diameter are predictors of treatment efficacy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1