Neutrophil extracellular traps formation and autophagy in bongkrekic acid exposed human neutrophils.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q3 TOXICOLOGY Toxicology in Vitro Pub Date : 2024-12-25 DOI:10.1016/j.tiv.2024.106003
Ershun Zhou, Yifei Li, Zhikai Wu, Yichun Chen, Hanpeng Wu, Yingrong Ye, Tianyu Li, Jingjing Wang, Zhengtao Yang
{"title":"Neutrophil extracellular traps formation and autophagy in bongkrekic acid exposed human neutrophils.","authors":"Ershun Zhou, Yifei Li, Zhikai Wu, Yichun Chen, Hanpeng Wu, Yingrong Ye, Tianyu Li, Jingjing Wang, Zhengtao Yang","doi":"10.1016/j.tiv.2024.106003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Bongkrekic acid (BKA), a less well-known foodborne toxin, has been implicated in numerous poisoning incidents. Recent studies suggest that BKA exerts an impact on the immune system, particularly on innate immunity. The release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) is relatively a newly-discovered mechanism involving innate immunity. This study was designed to characterize and evaluate the effects of BKA on human NET formation. The co-localization of DNA, histones, and myeloperoxidase (MPO) was determined via immunostaining to confirm BKA-triggered NET formation in human neutrophils. NET quantification showed that NET formation induced by BKA was both time- and dose-dependent, and was associated with p38, ERK, PAD4 and P2X1 receptor. Moreover, immunostaining analysis observed that BKA triggered both NET formation and autophagy. Additionally, pharmacological experiments revealed that autophagy mediated BKA-triggered NET formation. Collectively, these insights offer a novel perspective on the effects of BKA exposure on host's innate immune response, and may shed new light on BKA poisoning. We call for further work to be conducted in this field to unravel the intricate mechanisms governing NET formation and autophagy in the context of BKA poisoning.</p>","PeriodicalId":54423,"journal":{"name":"Toxicology in Vitro","volume":" ","pages":"106003"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicology in Vitro","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2024.106003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bongkrekic acid (BKA), a less well-known foodborne toxin, has been implicated in numerous poisoning incidents. Recent studies suggest that BKA exerts an impact on the immune system, particularly on innate immunity. The release of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) is relatively a newly-discovered mechanism involving innate immunity. This study was designed to characterize and evaluate the effects of BKA on human NET formation. The co-localization of DNA, histones, and myeloperoxidase (MPO) was determined via immunostaining to confirm BKA-triggered NET formation in human neutrophils. NET quantification showed that NET formation induced by BKA was both time- and dose-dependent, and was associated with p38, ERK, PAD4 and P2X1 receptor. Moreover, immunostaining analysis observed that BKA triggered both NET formation and autophagy. Additionally, pharmacological experiments revealed that autophagy mediated BKA-triggered NET formation. Collectively, these insights offer a novel perspective on the effects of BKA exposure on host's innate immune response, and may shed new light on BKA poisoning. We call for further work to be conducted in this field to unravel the intricate mechanisms governing NET formation and autophagy in the context of BKA poisoning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicology in Vitro
Toxicology in Vitro 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
181
审稿时长
65 days
期刊介绍: Toxicology in Vitro publishes original research papers and reviews on the application and use of in vitro systems for assessing or predicting the toxic effects of chemicals and elucidating their mechanisms of action. These in vitro techniques include utilizing cell or tissue cultures, isolated cells, tissue slices, subcellular fractions, transgenic cell cultures, and cells from transgenic organisms, as well as in silico modelling. The Journal will focus on investigations that involve the development and validation of new in vitro methods, e.g. for prediction of toxic effects based on traditional and in silico modelling; on the use of methods in high-throughput toxicology and pharmacology; elucidation of mechanisms of toxic action; the application of genomics, transcriptomics and proteomics in toxicology, as well as on comparative studies that characterise the relationship between in vitro and in vivo findings. The Journal strongly encourages the submission of manuscripts that focus on the development of in vitro methods, their practical applications and regulatory use (e.g. in the areas of food components cosmetics, pharmaceuticals, pesticides, and industrial chemicals). Toxicology in Vitro discourages papers that record reporting on toxicological effects from materials, such as plant extracts or herbal medicines, that have not been chemically characterized.
期刊最新文献
Cyclosporin A toxicity on endothelial cells differentiated from induced pluripotent stem cells: Assembling an adverse outcome pathway. Protective effects of methylnissolin and methylnissolin-3-O-β-d-glucopyranoside on TNF-α-induced inflammation in human dermal fibroblasts. Washing with buffered vitamin C after corrosive chemical (sodium hypochlorite) exposure reduces ocular depth of injury. Toxicological investigation of bisphenol A and its derivates on human breast epithelial (MCF-10A) cells. Neutrophil extracellular traps formation and autophagy in bongkrekic acid exposed human neutrophils.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1